Targeting DNA damage response components induces enhanced STING-dependent type-I IFN response in ATM deficient cancer cells and drives dendritic cell activation

The concept of exploiting tumor intrinsic deficiencies in DNA damage repair mechanisms by inhibiting compensatory DNA repair pathways is well established. For example, ATM-deficient cells show increased sensitivity to the ATR inhibitor ceralasertib. DNA damage response (DDR)-deficient cells are also...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Lopez-Pelaez, Lucy Young, Mercedes Vazquez-Chantada, Nadine Nelson, Steve Durant, Robert W. Wilkinson, Edmund Poon, Miguel Gaspar, Viia Valge-Archer, Paul Smith, Simon J. Dovedi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:OncoImmunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2162402X.2022.2117321
_version_ 1811183612821766144
author Marta Lopez-Pelaez
Lucy Young
Mercedes Vazquez-Chantada
Nadine Nelson
Steve Durant
Robert W. Wilkinson
Edmund Poon
Miguel Gaspar
Viia Valge-Archer
Paul Smith
Simon J. Dovedi
author_facet Marta Lopez-Pelaez
Lucy Young
Mercedes Vazquez-Chantada
Nadine Nelson
Steve Durant
Robert W. Wilkinson
Edmund Poon
Miguel Gaspar
Viia Valge-Archer
Paul Smith
Simon J. Dovedi
author_sort Marta Lopez-Pelaez
collection DOAJ
description The concept of exploiting tumor intrinsic deficiencies in DNA damage repair mechanisms by inhibiting compensatory DNA repair pathways is well established. For example, ATM-deficient cells show increased sensitivity to the ATR inhibitor ceralasertib. DNA damage response (DDR)-deficient cells are also more sensitive to DNA damaging agents like the DNA crosslinker pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) SG-3199. However, additional antitumor benefits from targeting the DDR pathways, which could operate through the activation of the innate immune system are less well studied. DNA accumulation in the cytosol acts as an immunogenic danger signal, inducing the expression of type-I interferon (IFN) stimulated genes (ISGs) by the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway. Here, we demonstrate that ATM −/− FaDu tumor cells have higher basal expression of ISGs when compared to WT cells and respond to ceralasertib and PBD SG-3199 by inducing higher levels of ISGs in a cGAS-STING-dependent manner. We show that sensitive tumor cells treated with ceralasertib and PBD SG-3199 activate dendritic cells (DCs) via a type-I IFN-dependent mechanism. However, STING deficiency in tumor cells does not prevent DC activation, suggesting that transactivation of the STING pathway occurs within DCs. Furthermore, depletion of the cytosolic DNA exonuclease TREX1 in tumor cells increases DC activation in response to PBD SG-3199-treated tumor cells, indicating that an increase in tumor-derived cytosolic DNA may further enhance DC activation. In summary, in this study, we show that ceralasertib and PBD SG-3199 treatment not only intrinsically target tumor cells but also extrinsically increase tumor cell immunogenicity by inducing DC activation, which is enhanced in ATM-deficient cells.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T09:49:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d2d450388024f9abe63eda60fc9f35d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2162-402X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T09:49:53Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series OncoImmunology
spelling doaj.art-9d2d450388024f9abe63eda60fc9f35d2022-12-22T04:30:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupOncoImmunology2162-402X2022-12-0111110.1080/2162402X.2022.2117321Targeting DNA damage response components induces enhanced STING-dependent type-I IFN response in ATM deficient cancer cells and drives dendritic cell activationMarta Lopez-Pelaez0Lucy Young1Mercedes Vazquez-Chantada2Nadine Nelson3Steve Durant4Robert W. Wilkinson5Edmund Poon6Miguel Gaspar7Viia Valge-Archer8Paul Smith9Simon J. Dovedi10Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKDiscovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, UKOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, UKThe concept of exploiting tumor intrinsic deficiencies in DNA damage repair mechanisms by inhibiting compensatory DNA repair pathways is well established. For example, ATM-deficient cells show increased sensitivity to the ATR inhibitor ceralasertib. DNA damage response (DDR)-deficient cells are also more sensitive to DNA damaging agents like the DNA crosslinker pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) SG-3199. However, additional antitumor benefits from targeting the DDR pathways, which could operate through the activation of the innate immune system are less well studied. DNA accumulation in the cytosol acts as an immunogenic danger signal, inducing the expression of type-I interferon (IFN) stimulated genes (ISGs) by the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway. Here, we demonstrate that ATM −/− FaDu tumor cells have higher basal expression of ISGs when compared to WT cells and respond to ceralasertib and PBD SG-3199 by inducing higher levels of ISGs in a cGAS-STING-dependent manner. We show that sensitive tumor cells treated with ceralasertib and PBD SG-3199 activate dendritic cells (DCs) via a type-I IFN-dependent mechanism. However, STING deficiency in tumor cells does not prevent DC activation, suggesting that transactivation of the STING pathway occurs within DCs. Furthermore, depletion of the cytosolic DNA exonuclease TREX1 in tumor cells increases DC activation in response to PBD SG-3199-treated tumor cells, indicating that an increase in tumor-derived cytosolic DNA may further enhance DC activation. In summary, in this study, we show that ceralasertib and PBD SG-3199 treatment not only intrinsically target tumor cells but also extrinsically increase tumor cell immunogenicity by inducing DC activation, which is enhanced in ATM-deficient cells.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2162402X.2022.2117321DNA damage repairDDRATRATMceralasertibPBD SG-3199
spellingShingle Marta Lopez-Pelaez
Lucy Young
Mercedes Vazquez-Chantada
Nadine Nelson
Steve Durant
Robert W. Wilkinson
Edmund Poon
Miguel Gaspar
Viia Valge-Archer
Paul Smith
Simon J. Dovedi
Targeting DNA damage response components induces enhanced STING-dependent type-I IFN response in ATM deficient cancer cells and drives dendritic cell activation
OncoImmunology
DNA damage repair
DDR
ATR
ATM
ceralasertib
PBD SG-3199
title Targeting DNA damage response components induces enhanced STING-dependent type-I IFN response in ATM deficient cancer cells and drives dendritic cell activation
title_full Targeting DNA damage response components induces enhanced STING-dependent type-I IFN response in ATM deficient cancer cells and drives dendritic cell activation
title_fullStr Targeting DNA damage response components induces enhanced STING-dependent type-I IFN response in ATM deficient cancer cells and drives dendritic cell activation
title_full_unstemmed Targeting DNA damage response components induces enhanced STING-dependent type-I IFN response in ATM deficient cancer cells and drives dendritic cell activation
title_short Targeting DNA damage response components induces enhanced STING-dependent type-I IFN response in ATM deficient cancer cells and drives dendritic cell activation
title_sort targeting dna damage response components induces enhanced sting dependent type i ifn response in atm deficient cancer cells and drives dendritic cell activation
topic DNA damage repair
DDR
ATR
ATM
ceralasertib
PBD SG-3199
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2162402X.2022.2117321
work_keys_str_mv AT martalopezpelaez targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT lucyyoung targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT mercedesvazquezchantada targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT nadinenelson targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT stevedurant targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT robertwwilkinson targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT edmundpoon targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT miguelgaspar targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT viiavalgearcher targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT paulsmith targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation
AT simonjdovedi targetingdnadamageresponsecomponentsinducesenhancedstingdependenttypeiifnresponseinatmdeficientcancercellsanddrivesdendriticcellactivation