The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions

Abstract Background Voluntary assisted dying became lawful in Victoria, the first Australian state to permit this practice, in 2019 via the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic). While conscientious objection by individual health professionals is protected by the Victorian legislation, objections...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ben P. White, Ruthie Jeanneret, Eliana Close, Lindy Willmott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00902-3
_version_ 1797273336759189504
author Ben P. White
Ruthie Jeanneret
Eliana Close
Lindy Willmott
author_facet Ben P. White
Ruthie Jeanneret
Eliana Close
Lindy Willmott
author_sort Ben P. White
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Voluntary assisted dying became lawful in Victoria, the first Australian state to permit this practice, in 2019 via the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic). While conscientious objection by individual health professionals is protected by the Victorian legislation, objections by institutions are governed by policy. No research has been conducted in Victoria, and very little research conducted internationally, on how institutional objection is experienced by patients seeking assisted dying. Methods 28 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 family caregivers and one patient about the experience of 28 patients who sought assisted dying. Participants were interviewed during August-November 2021. Data from the 17 interviews (all with family caregivers) which reported institutional objection were analysed thematically. Results Participants reported institutional objection affecting eligibility assessments, medication access, and taking the medication or having it administered. Institutional objection occurred across health settings and was sometimes communicated obliquely. These objections resulted in delays, transfers, and choices between progressing an assisted dying application and receiving palliative or other care. Participants also reported objections causing adverse emotional experiences and distrust of objecting institutions. Six mediating influences on institutional objections were identified: staff views within objecting institutions; support of external medical practitioners and pharmacists providing assisted dying services; nature of a patient’s illness; progression or state of a patient’s illness; patient’s geographical location; and the capability and assertiveness of a patient and/or caregiver. Conclusions Institutional objection to assisted dying is much-debated yet empirically understudied. This research found that in Victoria, objections were regularly reported by participants and adversely affected access to assisted dying and the wider end-of-life experience for patients and caregivers. This barrier arises in an assisted dying system that is already procedurally challenging, particularly given the limited window patients have to apply. Better regulation may be needed as Victoria’s existing policy approach appears to preference institutional positions over patient’s choice given existing power dynamics.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:42:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d2fbeedbf66497087bd06c9c4260d96
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6939
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:42:53Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Ethics
spelling doaj.art-9d2fbeedbf66497087bd06c9c4260d962024-03-05T20:11:18ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392023-03-0124111210.1186/s12910-023-00902-3The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptionsBen P. White0Ruthie Jeanneret1Eliana Close2Lindy Willmott3Faculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of TechnologyFaculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of TechnologyFaculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of TechnologyFaculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of TechnologyAbstract Background Voluntary assisted dying became lawful in Victoria, the first Australian state to permit this practice, in 2019 via the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic). While conscientious objection by individual health professionals is protected by the Victorian legislation, objections by institutions are governed by policy. No research has been conducted in Victoria, and very little research conducted internationally, on how institutional objection is experienced by patients seeking assisted dying. Methods 28 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 family caregivers and one patient about the experience of 28 patients who sought assisted dying. Participants were interviewed during August-November 2021. Data from the 17 interviews (all with family caregivers) which reported institutional objection were analysed thematically. Results Participants reported institutional objection affecting eligibility assessments, medication access, and taking the medication or having it administered. Institutional objection occurred across health settings and was sometimes communicated obliquely. These objections resulted in delays, transfers, and choices between progressing an assisted dying application and receiving palliative or other care. Participants also reported objections causing adverse emotional experiences and distrust of objecting institutions. Six mediating influences on institutional objections were identified: staff views within objecting institutions; support of external medical practitioners and pharmacists providing assisted dying services; nature of a patient’s illness; progression or state of a patient’s illness; patient’s geographical location; and the capability and assertiveness of a patient and/or caregiver. Conclusions Institutional objection to assisted dying is much-debated yet empirically understudied. This research found that in Victoria, objections were regularly reported by participants and adversely affected access to assisted dying and the wider end-of-life experience for patients and caregivers. This barrier arises in an assisted dying system that is already procedurally challenging, particularly given the limited window patients have to apply. Better regulation may be needed as Victoria’s existing policy approach appears to preference institutional positions over patient’s choice given existing power dynamics.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00902-3Assisted dyingMedical assistance in dyingEuthanasiaAssisted suicideInstitutional objectionPatient experience
spellingShingle Ben P. White
Ruthie Jeanneret
Eliana Close
Lindy Willmott
The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions
BMC Medical Ethics
Assisted dying
Medical assistance in dying
Euthanasia
Assisted suicide
Institutional objection
Patient experience
title The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions
title_full The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions
title_fullStr The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions
title_full_unstemmed The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions
title_short The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions
title_sort impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying a qualitative study of family caregivers perceptions
topic Assisted dying
Medical assistance in dying
Euthanasia
Assisted suicide
Institutional objection
Patient experience
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00902-3
work_keys_str_mv AT benpwhite theimpactonpatientsofobjectionsbyinstitutionstoassisteddyingaqualitativestudyoffamilycaregiversperceptions
AT ruthiejeanneret theimpactonpatientsofobjectionsbyinstitutionstoassisteddyingaqualitativestudyoffamilycaregiversperceptions
AT elianaclose theimpactonpatientsofobjectionsbyinstitutionstoassisteddyingaqualitativestudyoffamilycaregiversperceptions
AT lindywillmott theimpactonpatientsofobjectionsbyinstitutionstoassisteddyingaqualitativestudyoffamilycaregiversperceptions
AT benpwhite impactonpatientsofobjectionsbyinstitutionstoassisteddyingaqualitativestudyoffamilycaregiversperceptions
AT ruthiejeanneret impactonpatientsofobjectionsbyinstitutionstoassisteddyingaqualitativestudyoffamilycaregiversperceptions
AT elianaclose impactonpatientsofobjectionsbyinstitutionstoassisteddyingaqualitativestudyoffamilycaregiversperceptions
AT lindywillmott impactonpatientsofobjectionsbyinstitutionstoassisteddyingaqualitativestudyoffamilycaregiversperceptions