Intramuscular fat in gluteus maximus for different levels of physical activity

Abstract We aimed to determine if gluteus maximus (GMAX) fat infiltration is associated with different levels of physical activity. Identifying and quantifying differences in the intramuscular fat content of GMAX in subjects with different levels of physical activity can provide a new tool to evalua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin A. Belzunce, Johann Henckel, Anna Di Laura, Alister Hart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-11-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00790-w
_version_ 1819001471639748608
author Martin A. Belzunce
Johann Henckel
Anna Di Laura
Alister Hart
author_facet Martin A. Belzunce
Johann Henckel
Anna Di Laura
Alister Hart
author_sort Martin A. Belzunce
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We aimed to determine if gluteus maximus (GMAX) fat infiltration is associated with different levels of physical activity. Identifying and quantifying differences in the intramuscular fat content of GMAX in subjects with different levels of physical activity can provide a new tool to evaluate hip muscles health. This was a cross-sectional study involving seventy subjects that underwent Dixon MRI of the pelvis. The individuals were divided into four groups by levels of physical activity, from low to high: inactive patients due to hip pain; and low, medium and high physical activity groups of healthy subjects (HS) based on hours of exercise per week. We estimated the GMAX intramuscular fat content for each subject using automated measurements of fat fraction (FF) from Dixon images. The GMAX volume and lean volume were also measured and normalized by lean body mass. The effects of body mass index (BMI) and age were included in the statistical analysis. The patient group had a significantly higher FF than the three groups of HS (median values of 26.2%, 17.8%, 16.7% and 13.7% respectively, p < 0.001). The normalized lean volume was significantly larger in the high activity group compared to all the other groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.002 and p = 0.02). Employing a hierarchical linear regression analysis, we found that hip pain, low physical activity, female gender and high BMI were statistically significant predictors of increased GMAX fat infiltration.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T22:49:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d37e6271a90466fa5fa4076f452695e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T22:49:44Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-9d37e6271a90466fa5fa4076f452695e2022-12-21T19:24:16ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-11-0111111010.1038/s41598-021-00790-wIntramuscular fat in gluteus maximus for different levels of physical activityMartin A. Belzunce0Johann Henckel1Anna Di Laura2Alister Hart3Royal National Orthopaedic HospitalRoyal National Orthopaedic HospitalRoyal National Orthopaedic HospitalRoyal National Orthopaedic HospitalAbstract We aimed to determine if gluteus maximus (GMAX) fat infiltration is associated with different levels of physical activity. Identifying and quantifying differences in the intramuscular fat content of GMAX in subjects with different levels of physical activity can provide a new tool to evaluate hip muscles health. This was a cross-sectional study involving seventy subjects that underwent Dixon MRI of the pelvis. The individuals were divided into four groups by levels of physical activity, from low to high: inactive patients due to hip pain; and low, medium and high physical activity groups of healthy subjects (HS) based on hours of exercise per week. We estimated the GMAX intramuscular fat content for each subject using automated measurements of fat fraction (FF) from Dixon images. The GMAX volume and lean volume were also measured and normalized by lean body mass. The effects of body mass index (BMI) and age were included in the statistical analysis. The patient group had a significantly higher FF than the three groups of HS (median values of 26.2%, 17.8%, 16.7% and 13.7% respectively, p < 0.001). The normalized lean volume was significantly larger in the high activity group compared to all the other groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.002 and p = 0.02). Employing a hierarchical linear regression analysis, we found that hip pain, low physical activity, female gender and high BMI were statistically significant predictors of increased GMAX fat infiltration.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00790-w
spellingShingle Martin A. Belzunce
Johann Henckel
Anna Di Laura
Alister Hart
Intramuscular fat in gluteus maximus for different levels of physical activity
Scientific Reports
title Intramuscular fat in gluteus maximus for different levels of physical activity
title_full Intramuscular fat in gluteus maximus for different levels of physical activity
title_fullStr Intramuscular fat in gluteus maximus for different levels of physical activity
title_full_unstemmed Intramuscular fat in gluteus maximus for different levels of physical activity
title_short Intramuscular fat in gluteus maximus for different levels of physical activity
title_sort intramuscular fat in gluteus maximus for different levels of physical activity
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00790-w
work_keys_str_mv AT martinabelzunce intramuscularfatingluteusmaximusfordifferentlevelsofphysicalactivity
AT johannhenckel intramuscularfatingluteusmaximusfordifferentlevelsofphysicalactivity
AT annadilaura intramuscularfatingluteusmaximusfordifferentlevelsofphysicalactivity
AT alisterhart intramuscularfatingluteusmaximusfordifferentlevelsofphysicalactivity