A reflection on the validity of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action in the Islamic jurisprudence

In this paper, the authors after assuming the kinds of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action on the human and god right, at first, consider some individuals rights consisting the financial and bodily rights, and then, contrary to the famous shiâit jurists be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Nasiri Muqaddam, S. Fathi Kate Gonbadi, E. Aliakbari Babookani
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Semnan University 2014-06-01
Series:مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1916_04f20c544c860f52b102a44fd08d1086.pdf
_version_ 1797296420859936768
author H. Nasiri Muqaddam
S. Fathi Kate Gonbadi
E. Aliakbari Babookani
author_facet H. Nasiri Muqaddam
S. Fathi Kate Gonbadi
E. Aliakbari Babookani
author_sort H. Nasiri Muqaddam
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, the authors after assuming the kinds of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action on the human and god right, at first, consider some individuals rights consisting the financial and bodily rights, and then, contrary to the famous shiâit jurists believe that arresting persons claiming insolvency isnât permissible, and criticize the reasons of agreeing persons. Then they claim that on the charge of theft, according to the evidences, it canât arrest the accused and in the continuation, they allow temporary detention for accused of wilful murder, and think that the reasons of opposing persons fail to prove their claims, and demonstrate the evidences in addition to the evidences of agreeing persons. Concerning the charges of assault and battery, authors in agree with shahid avval and mohaggeg-e-sabzevari, believe that the accused can be arrested temporarily, and in their view, the proofs of some who donât agree with temporary detention is imperfect in proving their claims, and criticize them and in addition to proofs of who agree with being permissible, they bring about more documentary evidences, too. On the charge of manslaughter, they forbid temporary detention. And eventually, on the charge of criminal act in divine rights, in addition to lacking of reasons for legitimacy of temporary detention, they provide the evidences indicating it is not to be allowed.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:04:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d436381627b4c6f9f4a1186fa545cae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-7012
2717-0330
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:04:28Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Semnan University
record_format Article
series مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
spelling doaj.art-9d436381627b4c6f9f4a1186fa545cae2024-02-23T23:17:14ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی2008-70122717-03302014-06-0161021123810.22075/feqh.2017.19161916A reflection on the validity of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action in the Islamic jurisprudenceH. Nasiri MuqaddamS. Fathi Kate GonbadiE. Aliakbari BabookaniIn this paper, the authors after assuming the kinds of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action on the human and god right, at first, consider some individuals rights consisting the financial and bodily rights, and then, contrary to the famous shiâit jurists believe that arresting persons claiming insolvency isnât permissible, and criticize the reasons of agreeing persons. Then they claim that on the charge of theft, according to the evidences, it canât arrest the accused and in the continuation, they allow temporary detention for accused of wilful murder, and think that the reasons of opposing persons fail to prove their claims, and demonstrate the evidences in addition to the evidences of agreeing persons. Concerning the charges of assault and battery, authors in agree with shahid avval and mohaggeg-e-sabzevari, believe that the accused can be arrested temporarily, and in their view, the proofs of some who donât agree with temporary detention is imperfect in proving their claims, and criticize them and in addition to proofs of who agree with being permissible, they bring about more documentary evidences, too. On the charge of manslaughter, they forbid temporary detention. And eventually, on the charge of criminal act in divine rights, in addition to lacking of reasons for legitimacy of temporary detention, they provide the evidences indicating it is not to be allowed.https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1916_04f20c544c860f52b102a44fd08d1086.pdftemporary detentionsafeguardingprecautionaryhuman rightsgod rights
spellingShingle H. Nasiri Muqaddam
S. Fathi Kate Gonbadi
E. Aliakbari Babookani
A reflection on the validity of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action in the Islamic jurisprudence
مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
temporary detention
safeguarding
precautionary
human rights
god rights
title A reflection on the validity of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action in the Islamic jurisprudence
title_full A reflection on the validity of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action in the Islamic jurisprudence
title_fullStr A reflection on the validity of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action in the Islamic jurisprudence
title_full_unstemmed A reflection on the validity of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action in the Islamic jurisprudence
title_short A reflection on the validity of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action in the Islamic jurisprudence
title_sort reflection on the validity of imprisonment and temporary detention as a safeguarding and precautionary action in the islamic jurisprudence
topic temporary detention
safeguarding
precautionary
human rights
god rights
url https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1916_04f20c544c860f52b102a44fd08d1086.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hnasirimuqaddam areflectiononthevalidityofimprisonmentandtemporarydetentionasasafeguardingandprecautionaryactionintheislamicjurisprudence
AT sfathikategonbadi areflectiononthevalidityofimprisonmentandtemporarydetentionasasafeguardingandprecautionaryactionintheislamicjurisprudence
AT ealiakbaribabookani areflectiononthevalidityofimprisonmentandtemporarydetentionasasafeguardingandprecautionaryactionintheislamicjurisprudence
AT hnasirimuqaddam reflectiononthevalidityofimprisonmentandtemporarydetentionasasafeguardingandprecautionaryactionintheislamicjurisprudence
AT sfathikategonbadi reflectiononthevalidityofimprisonmentandtemporarydetentionasasafeguardingandprecautionaryactionintheislamicjurisprudence
AT ealiakbaribabookani reflectiononthevalidityofimprisonmentandtemporarydetentionasasafeguardingandprecautionaryactionintheislamicjurisprudence