Evaluation of colposcopy after the addition of human papillomavirus testing to the Turkish cervical cancer screening program

Abstract Objective To evaluate colposcopy performance following the human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA screening program in Turkey. Methods Women aged 30–65 years are screened for cervical cancer every 5 years, with individuals positive for HPV 16 and/or 18 or other high‐risk HPV types with abnormal cyt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Can Gunes, Nejat Ozgul, Murat Turkyılmaz, Fatih Kara, Fahriye Unlu, Ali Ayhan, Murat Gultekin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-12-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6740
_version_ 1827395166646829056
author Ali Can Gunes
Nejat Ozgul
Murat Turkyılmaz
Fatih Kara
Fahriye Unlu
Ali Ayhan
Murat Gultekin
author_facet Ali Can Gunes
Nejat Ozgul
Murat Turkyılmaz
Fatih Kara
Fahriye Unlu
Ali Ayhan
Murat Gultekin
author_sort Ali Can Gunes
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To evaluate colposcopy performance following the human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA screening program in Turkey. Methods Women aged 30–65 years are screened for cervical cancer every 5 years, with individuals positive for HPV 16 and/or 18 or other high‐risk HPV types with abnormal cytology referred for colposcopy. Both HPV test and cytology are obtained at the same visit. If HPV is negative, cytology will not be assessed. However, if HPV is positive, both cytology and HPV genotyping will be performed. Colposcopy‐require was defined as HPV 16/18 positivity or abnormal smear results with any hrHPV positivity, and the remaining patients (normal smear with hrHPV positivity other than HPV 16/18) were grouped as colposcopy non‐required. National data on colposcopy outcomes and unnecessary performance rates in February 2018–2019 were evaluated via a questionnaire. Results A total of 9808 patients were included, divided based on colposcopy requirement: 5751 (58.6%) patients required colposcopy and 4057 (41.4%) did not. Unnecessary colposcopy was performed on 90.1% of the non‐required group (3657 of 4057 patients). In the colposcopy‐required group, 4455 patients (79.9%) underwent punch biopsy; 3194 (57.1%), endocervical curettage (ECC); and 421 (7.5%), “see and treat” in the non‐required group, the results were 2790 (76.3%), 1957 (53.2%), and 211 (5.7%), respectively. A total of 746 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)‐3 isolates were detected, including 702 using existing screening and triage with 94.1% sensitivity (702/746). Multiple biopsies were taken in 69.8% (n = 3110) of patients from the colposcopy‐required group and 63.7% (n = 1777) from the non‐required group. The ECC samples included 19 cervical cancers and 212 ≥CIN‐3 lesions in the colposcopy‐required group, and four cancers and 41 ≥CIN‐3 lesions in the non‐required group. The proportion of ≥CIN‐3 lesions detected by ECC only was 4.7% (35 of 746 ≥CIN‐3 lesions). Conclusion Our results showed high rates of unnecessary colposcopies, and a high percentage of multiple and random punch biopsies and ECC.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T18:27:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d5a60deebe84b8498a2c72ac118df42
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T18:27:55Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-9d5a60deebe84b8498a2c72ac118df422023-12-30T08:53:25ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342023-12-011224217512176010.1002/cam4.6740Evaluation of colposcopy after the addition of human papillomavirus testing to the Turkish cervical cancer screening programAli Can Gunes0Nejat Ozgul1Murat Turkyılmaz2Fatih Kara3Fahriye Unlu4Ali Ayhan5Murat Gultekin6Mamak State Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ankara TurkeyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Ankara TurkeyDepartment of Cancer Control Turkish Ministry of Health, Public Health Institute Ankara TurkeyDepartment of Cancer Control Turkish Ministry of Health, Public Health Institute Ankara TurkeyDepartment of Cancer Control Turkish Ministry of Health, Public Health Institute Ankara TurkeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Baskent University Faculty of Medicine Ankara TurkeyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Ankara TurkeyAbstract Objective To evaluate colposcopy performance following the human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA screening program in Turkey. Methods Women aged 30–65 years are screened for cervical cancer every 5 years, with individuals positive for HPV 16 and/or 18 or other high‐risk HPV types with abnormal cytology referred for colposcopy. Both HPV test and cytology are obtained at the same visit. If HPV is negative, cytology will not be assessed. However, if HPV is positive, both cytology and HPV genotyping will be performed. Colposcopy‐require was defined as HPV 16/18 positivity or abnormal smear results with any hrHPV positivity, and the remaining patients (normal smear with hrHPV positivity other than HPV 16/18) were grouped as colposcopy non‐required. National data on colposcopy outcomes and unnecessary performance rates in February 2018–2019 were evaluated via a questionnaire. Results A total of 9808 patients were included, divided based on colposcopy requirement: 5751 (58.6%) patients required colposcopy and 4057 (41.4%) did not. Unnecessary colposcopy was performed on 90.1% of the non‐required group (3657 of 4057 patients). In the colposcopy‐required group, 4455 patients (79.9%) underwent punch biopsy; 3194 (57.1%), endocervical curettage (ECC); and 421 (7.5%), “see and treat” in the non‐required group, the results were 2790 (76.3%), 1957 (53.2%), and 211 (5.7%), respectively. A total of 746 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)‐3 isolates were detected, including 702 using existing screening and triage with 94.1% sensitivity (702/746). Multiple biopsies were taken in 69.8% (n = 3110) of patients from the colposcopy‐required group and 63.7% (n = 1777) from the non‐required group. The ECC samples included 19 cervical cancers and 212 ≥CIN‐3 lesions in the colposcopy‐required group, and four cancers and 41 ≥CIN‐3 lesions in the non‐required group. The proportion of ≥CIN‐3 lesions detected by ECC only was 4.7% (35 of 746 ≥CIN‐3 lesions). Conclusion Our results showed high rates of unnecessary colposcopies, and a high percentage of multiple and random punch biopsies and ECC.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6740cervical cancercolposcopyhuman papillomavirus
spellingShingle Ali Can Gunes
Nejat Ozgul
Murat Turkyılmaz
Fatih Kara
Fahriye Unlu
Ali Ayhan
Murat Gultekin
Evaluation of colposcopy after the addition of human papillomavirus testing to the Turkish cervical cancer screening program
Cancer Medicine
cervical cancer
colposcopy
human papillomavirus
title Evaluation of colposcopy after the addition of human papillomavirus testing to the Turkish cervical cancer screening program
title_full Evaluation of colposcopy after the addition of human papillomavirus testing to the Turkish cervical cancer screening program
title_fullStr Evaluation of colposcopy after the addition of human papillomavirus testing to the Turkish cervical cancer screening program
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of colposcopy after the addition of human papillomavirus testing to the Turkish cervical cancer screening program
title_short Evaluation of colposcopy after the addition of human papillomavirus testing to the Turkish cervical cancer screening program
title_sort evaluation of colposcopy after the addition of human papillomavirus testing to the turkish cervical cancer screening program
topic cervical cancer
colposcopy
human papillomavirus
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6740
work_keys_str_mv AT alicangunes evaluationofcolposcopyaftertheadditionofhumanpapillomavirustestingtotheturkishcervicalcancerscreeningprogram
AT nejatozgul evaluationofcolposcopyaftertheadditionofhumanpapillomavirustestingtotheturkishcervicalcancerscreeningprogram
AT muratturkyılmaz evaluationofcolposcopyaftertheadditionofhumanpapillomavirustestingtotheturkishcervicalcancerscreeningprogram
AT fatihkara evaluationofcolposcopyaftertheadditionofhumanpapillomavirustestingtotheturkishcervicalcancerscreeningprogram
AT fahriyeunlu evaluationofcolposcopyaftertheadditionofhumanpapillomavirustestingtotheturkishcervicalcancerscreeningprogram
AT aliayhan evaluationofcolposcopyaftertheadditionofhumanpapillomavirustestingtotheturkishcervicalcancerscreeningprogram
AT muratgultekin evaluationofcolposcopyaftertheadditionofhumanpapillomavirustestingtotheturkishcervicalcancerscreeningprogram