Morbimortality assessment in abdominal surgery: are we predicting or overreacting?

Abstract Background High-risk surgical procedures represent a fundamental part of general surgery practice due to its significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Different predictive tools have been created in order to quantify perioperative morbidity and mortality risk. POSSUM (Physiological and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Valenzuela, Laura Niño, Danny Conde, Felipe Girón, Lina Rodríguez, David Venegas, Carlos Rey, Ricardo Nassar, Marco Vanegas, Daniel Jiménez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01455-1
_version_ 1798016355050455040
author Sebastian Valenzuela
Laura Niño
Danny Conde
Felipe Girón
Lina Rodríguez
David Venegas
Carlos Rey
Ricardo Nassar
Marco Vanegas
Daniel Jiménez
author_facet Sebastian Valenzuela
Laura Niño
Danny Conde
Felipe Girón
Lina Rodríguez
David Venegas
Carlos Rey
Ricardo Nassar
Marco Vanegas
Daniel Jiménez
author_sort Sebastian Valenzuela
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background High-risk surgical procedures represent a fundamental part of general surgery practice due to its significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Different predictive tools have been created in order to quantify perioperative morbidity and mortality risk. POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity) is one of the most widely validated predictive scores considering physiological and operative variables to precisely define morbimortality risk. Nevertheless, seeking greater accuracy in predictions P-POSSUM was proposed. We aimed to compare POSSUM and P-POSSUM for patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Methods A retrospective observational study with a prospective database was conducted. Patients over 18 years old who complied with inclusion criteria between 2015 and 2016 were included. Variables included in the POSSUM and P-POSSUM Scores were analyzed. Descriptive statistics of all study parameters were provided. The analysis included socio-demographic data, laboratory values ​​, and imaging. Bivariate analysis was performed. Results 350 Patients were included in the analysis, 55.1% were female. The mean age was 55.9 ± 20.4 years old. POSSUM revealed a moderated index score in 61.7% of the patients, mean score of 12.85 points ± 5.61. 89.1% of patients had no neoplastic diagnosis associated. Overall morbidity and mortality rate was 14.2% and 7.1%. P-POSSUM could predict more precisely mortality (p < 0.00). Conclusions The POSSUM score is likely to overestimate the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with high/moderate risk, while the P-POSSUM score seems to be a more accurate predictor of mortality risk. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T15:49:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d6371ace5c54c15954518c250d2b1f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T15:49:20Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj.art-9d6371ace5c54c15954518c250d2b1f72022-12-22T04:15:26ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822022-01-012211610.1186/s12893-021-01455-1Morbimortality assessment in abdominal surgery: are we predicting or overreacting?Sebastian Valenzuela0Laura Niño1Danny Conde2Felipe Girón3Lina Rodríguez4David Venegas5Carlos Rey6Ricardo Nassar7Marco Vanegas8Daniel Jiménez9Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario MederiSchool of Medicine, Universidad del RosarioDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario MederiDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario MederiSchool of Medicine, Universidad de los AndesDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario MederiDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario MederiSchool of Medicine, Universidad del RosarioDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario MederiSchool of Medicine, Universidad del RosarioAbstract Background High-risk surgical procedures represent a fundamental part of general surgery practice due to its significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Different predictive tools have been created in order to quantify perioperative morbidity and mortality risk. POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity) is one of the most widely validated predictive scores considering physiological and operative variables to precisely define morbimortality risk. Nevertheless, seeking greater accuracy in predictions P-POSSUM was proposed. We aimed to compare POSSUM and P-POSSUM for patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Methods A retrospective observational study with a prospective database was conducted. Patients over 18 years old who complied with inclusion criteria between 2015 and 2016 were included. Variables included in the POSSUM and P-POSSUM Scores were analyzed. Descriptive statistics of all study parameters were provided. The analysis included socio-demographic data, laboratory values ​​, and imaging. Bivariate analysis was performed. Results 350 Patients were included in the analysis, 55.1% were female. The mean age was 55.9 ± 20.4 years old. POSSUM revealed a moderated index score in 61.7% of the patients, mean score of 12.85 points ± 5.61. 89.1% of patients had no neoplastic diagnosis associated. Overall morbidity and mortality rate was 14.2% and 7.1%. P-POSSUM could predict more precisely mortality (p < 0.00). Conclusions The POSSUM score is likely to overestimate the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with high/moderate risk, while the P-POSSUM score seems to be a more accurate predictor of mortality risk. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01455-1Risk prediction modelMortalityCritical careLaparotomyPrognosis
spellingShingle Sebastian Valenzuela
Laura Niño
Danny Conde
Felipe Girón
Lina Rodríguez
David Venegas
Carlos Rey
Ricardo Nassar
Marco Vanegas
Daniel Jiménez
Morbimortality assessment in abdominal surgery: are we predicting or overreacting?
BMC Surgery
Risk prediction model
Mortality
Critical care
Laparotomy
Prognosis
title Morbimortality assessment in abdominal surgery: are we predicting or overreacting?
title_full Morbimortality assessment in abdominal surgery: are we predicting or overreacting?
title_fullStr Morbimortality assessment in abdominal surgery: are we predicting or overreacting?
title_full_unstemmed Morbimortality assessment in abdominal surgery: are we predicting or overreacting?
title_short Morbimortality assessment in abdominal surgery: are we predicting or overreacting?
title_sort morbimortality assessment in abdominal surgery are we predicting or overreacting
topic Risk prediction model
Mortality
Critical care
Laparotomy
Prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01455-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianvalenzuela morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting
AT lauranino morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting
AT dannyconde morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting
AT felipegiron morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting
AT linarodriguez morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting
AT davidvenegas morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting
AT carlosrey morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting
AT ricardonassar morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting
AT marcovanegas morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting
AT danieljimenez morbimortalityassessmentinabdominalsurgeryarewepredictingoroverreacting