Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases

Abstract Hematuria, either glomerular or extraglomerular, is defined as 3 or more red blood cells (RBCs)/high power field. Currently, urinalyses are commonly performed using automated urine sediment analyzers. To assess whether RBC counting by automated urine sediment analyzers is reliable for defin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Won Seok Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00457-6
_version_ 1819024909571981312
author Won Seok Yang
author_facet Won Seok Yang
author_sort Won Seok Yang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Hematuria, either glomerular or extraglomerular, is defined as 3 or more red blood cells (RBCs)/high power field. Currently, urinalyses are commonly performed using automated urine sediment analyzers. To assess whether RBC counting by automated urine sediment analyzers is reliable for defining hematuria in glomerular disease, random specimen urinalyses of men with nephritic glomerular disease (7674 urinalyses) and bladder cancer (12,510 urinalyses) were retrospectively reviewed. Urine RBCs were counted by an automated urine sediment analyzer based on flow cytometry (UF-1000i, Sysmex Corporation) or digital image analysis (Cobas 6500, Roche Diagnostics GmbH). In about 20% of urine specimens, the specific gravity was less than 1.010, making the RBC counts unreliable. In the urine specimens with specific gravity ≥ 1.010, RBC counts measured using either UF-1000i or Cobas 6500 were well correlated with the positive grades in the dipstick blood test. However, at a trace, 1+, or higher positive dipstick tests for blood, RBC counts were graded significantly lower in glomerular disease than in bladder cancer. The findings suggest that RBC counting by UF-1000i or Cobas 6500 underestimates the severity of hematuria in glomerular disease, possibly because dysmorphic RBCs in glomerular disease are susceptible to hemolysis and/or fail to be properly recognized.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T05:02:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d6a88e199904083a133048161f9924a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T05:02:17Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-9d6a88e199904083a133048161f9924a2022-12-21T19:15:13ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-10-011111810.1038/s41598-021-00457-6Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseasesWon Seok Yang0Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of MedicineAbstract Hematuria, either glomerular or extraglomerular, is defined as 3 or more red blood cells (RBCs)/high power field. Currently, urinalyses are commonly performed using automated urine sediment analyzers. To assess whether RBC counting by automated urine sediment analyzers is reliable for defining hematuria in glomerular disease, random specimen urinalyses of men with nephritic glomerular disease (7674 urinalyses) and bladder cancer (12,510 urinalyses) were retrospectively reviewed. Urine RBCs were counted by an automated urine sediment analyzer based on flow cytometry (UF-1000i, Sysmex Corporation) or digital image analysis (Cobas 6500, Roche Diagnostics GmbH). In about 20% of urine specimens, the specific gravity was less than 1.010, making the RBC counts unreliable. In the urine specimens with specific gravity ≥ 1.010, RBC counts measured using either UF-1000i or Cobas 6500 were well correlated with the positive grades in the dipstick blood test. However, at a trace, 1+, or higher positive dipstick tests for blood, RBC counts were graded significantly lower in glomerular disease than in bladder cancer. The findings suggest that RBC counting by UF-1000i or Cobas 6500 underestimates the severity of hematuria in glomerular disease, possibly because dysmorphic RBCs in glomerular disease are susceptible to hemolysis and/or fail to be properly recognized.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00457-6
spellingShingle Won Seok Yang
Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases
Scientific Reports
title Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases
title_full Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases
title_fullStr Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases
title_full_unstemmed Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases
title_short Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases
title_sort automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00457-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wonseokyang automatedurinesedimentanalyzersunderestimatetheseverityofhematuriainglomerulardiseases