Comparison of dexmedetomidine alone or with other sedatives for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review

Aim To compare the outcome of sole dexmedetomidine or with other sedative drugs in paediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Literature was obtained from PubMed and ScienceDirect from 2010-2020 using key words: sedation, paediatric, dexmedetomidine, ambulatory, MRI, keta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rudy Vitraludyono, Arie Utariani, Elizeus Hanindito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton 2023-02-01
Series:Medicinski Glasnik
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ljkzedo.ba/mgpdf/mg38/05_Vitraludyono_1532_A.pdf
_version_ 1827862434076950528
author Rudy Vitraludyono
Arie Utariani
Elizeus Hanindito
author_facet Rudy Vitraludyono
Arie Utariani
Elizeus Hanindito
author_sort Rudy Vitraludyono
collection DOAJ
description Aim To compare the outcome of sole dexmedetomidine or with other sedative drugs in paediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Literature was obtained from PubMed and ScienceDirect from 2010-2020 using key words: sedation, paediatric, dexmedetomidine, ambulatory, MRI, ketamine, propofol, midazolam. The literature selection was based on Participant, Intervention, Comparators, Outcomes (PICO) analysis. All English full-text and peer-reviewed articles were included. The primary outcome was hemodynamic stability, respiratory compromise, and recovery time. The risk of bias analysis was assessed using Cochrane collaboration Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0). Result Of 106 studies, 17 studies were included with a total 3.430 paediatric patients undergoing MRI. Dexmedetomidine alone provides a more stable hemodynamic but longer recovery time than ketamine, propofol or midazolam. The combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine provides more stable hemodynamics, especially in the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia, and does not significantly reduce airway configuration more than sole dexmedetomidine or ketamine. Intranasal dexmedetomidine is more recommended than its combination with midazolam. Combining dexmedetomidine with ketamine, propofol or midazolam provides a shorter recovery time. Conclusion A combination of dexmedetomidine with other sedatives such as ketamine, propofol and midazolam is better than sole dexmedetomidine for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:55:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d79430c22384d2ba45ddbf66f0e7d45
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1840-0132
1840-2445
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:55:10Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton
record_format Article
series Medicinski Glasnik
spelling doaj.art-9d79430c22384d2ba45ddbf66f0e7d452023-08-22T17:01:38ZengMedical Association of Zenica-Doboj CantonMedicinski Glasnik1840-01321840-24452023-02-0120171410.17392/1532-22Comparison of dexmedetomidine alone or with other sedatives for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic reviewRudy Vitraludyono0Arie Utariani1Elizeus Hanindito2Department of Anaesthesiology and ReanimationConsultant of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation; Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/ Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, IndonesiaConsultant of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation; Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/ Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, IndonesiaAim To compare the outcome of sole dexmedetomidine or with other sedative drugs in paediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Literature was obtained from PubMed and ScienceDirect from 2010-2020 using key words: sedation, paediatric, dexmedetomidine, ambulatory, MRI, ketamine, propofol, midazolam. The literature selection was based on Participant, Intervention, Comparators, Outcomes (PICO) analysis. All English full-text and peer-reviewed articles were included. The primary outcome was hemodynamic stability, respiratory compromise, and recovery time. The risk of bias analysis was assessed using Cochrane collaboration Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0). Result Of 106 studies, 17 studies were included with a total 3.430 paediatric patients undergoing MRI. Dexmedetomidine alone provides a more stable hemodynamic but longer recovery time than ketamine, propofol or midazolam. The combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine provides more stable hemodynamics, especially in the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia, and does not significantly reduce airway configuration more than sole dexmedetomidine or ketamine. Intranasal dexmedetomidine is more recommended than its combination with midazolam. Combining dexmedetomidine with ketamine, propofol or midazolam provides a shorter recovery time. Conclusion A combination of dexmedetomidine with other sedatives such as ketamine, propofol and midazolam is better than sole dexmedetomidine for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging.https://ljkzedo.ba/mgpdf/mg38/05_Vitraludyono_1532_A.pdfanaesthesiaketaminemidazolampropofol
spellingShingle Rudy Vitraludyono
Arie Utariani
Elizeus Hanindito
Comparison of dexmedetomidine alone or with other sedatives for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review
Medicinski Glasnik
anaesthesia
ketamine
midazolam
propofol
title Comparison of dexmedetomidine alone or with other sedatives for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review
title_full Comparison of dexmedetomidine alone or with other sedatives for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review
title_fullStr Comparison of dexmedetomidine alone or with other sedatives for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of dexmedetomidine alone or with other sedatives for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review
title_short Comparison of dexmedetomidine alone or with other sedatives for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review
title_sort comparison of dexmedetomidine alone or with other sedatives for paediatric sedation during magnetic resonance imaging a systematic review
topic anaesthesia
ketamine
midazolam
propofol
url https://ljkzedo.ba/mgpdf/mg38/05_Vitraludyono_1532_A.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rudyvitraludyono comparisonofdexmedetomidinealoneorwithothersedativesforpaediatricsedationduringmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview
AT arieutariani comparisonofdexmedetomidinealoneorwithothersedativesforpaediatricsedationduringmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview
AT elizeushanindito comparisonofdexmedetomidinealoneorwithothersedativesforpaediatricsedationduringmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview