Evaluation of obstetricians’ surgical decision making in the management of uterine rupture

Abstract Background Uterine rupture is an obstetric calamity with surgery as its management mainstay. Uterine repair without tubal ligation leaves a uterus that is more prone to repeat rupture while uterine repair with bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) or (sub)total hysterectomy predispose survivors to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justus Ndulue Eze, Okechukwu Bonaventure Anozie, Osaheni Lucky Lawani, Emmanuel Okechukwu Ndukwe, Uzoma Maryrose Agwu, Johnson Akuma Obuna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-06-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1367-8
_version_ 1811228773169758208
author Justus Ndulue Eze
Okechukwu Bonaventure Anozie
Osaheni Lucky Lawani
Emmanuel Okechukwu Ndukwe
Uzoma Maryrose Agwu
Johnson Akuma Obuna
author_facet Justus Ndulue Eze
Okechukwu Bonaventure Anozie
Osaheni Lucky Lawani
Emmanuel Okechukwu Ndukwe
Uzoma Maryrose Agwu
Johnson Akuma Obuna
author_sort Justus Ndulue Eze
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Uterine rupture is an obstetric calamity with surgery as its management mainstay. Uterine repair without tubal ligation leaves a uterus that is more prone to repeat rupture while uterine repair with bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) or (sub)total hysterectomy predispose survivors to psychosocial problems like marital disharmony. This study aims to evaluate obstetricians’ perspectives on surgical decision making in managing uterine rupture. Methods A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study of obstetricians at the 46th annual scientific conference of Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Nigeria in 2012. Data was analysed by descriptive and inferential statistics. Results Seventy-nine out of 110 obstetricians (71.8%) responded to the survey, of which 42 (53.2%) were consultants, 60 (75.9%) practised in government hospitals and 67 (84.8%) in urban hospitals, and all respondents managed women with uterine rupture. Previous cesarean scars and injudicious use of oxytocic are the commonest predisposing causes, and uterine rupture carries very high incidences of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Uterine repair only was commonly performed by 38 (48.1%) and uterine repair with BTL or (sub) total hysterectomy by 41 (51.9%) respondents. Surgical management is guided mainly by patients’ conditions and obstetricians’ surgical skills. Conclusion Obstetricians’ distribution in Nigeria leaves rural settings starved of specialist for obstetric emergencies. Caesarean scars are now a rising cause of ruptures. The surgical management of uterine rupture and obstetricians’ surgical preferences vary and are case scenario-dependent. Equitable redistribution of obstetricians and deployment of medical doctors to secondary hospitals in rural settings will make obstetric care more readily available and may reduce the prevalence and improve the outcome of uterine rupture. Obstetrician’s surgical decision-making should be guided by the prevailing case scenario and the ultimate aim should be to avert fatality and reduce morbidity.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:03:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d7dffa1fa654aba9471b5ad733b3310
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:03:25Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-9d7dffa1fa654aba9471b5ad733b33102022-12-22T03:37:30ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932017-06-011711810.1186/s12884-017-1367-8Evaluation of obstetricians’ surgical decision making in the management of uterine ruptureJustus Ndulue Eze0Okechukwu Bonaventure Anozie1Osaheni Lucky Lawani2Emmanuel Okechukwu Ndukwe3Uzoma Maryrose Agwu4Johnson Akuma Obuna5Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Teaching HospitalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Teaching HospitalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Teaching HospitalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Teaching HospitalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Teaching HospitalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Teaching HospitalAbstract Background Uterine rupture is an obstetric calamity with surgery as its management mainstay. Uterine repair without tubal ligation leaves a uterus that is more prone to repeat rupture while uterine repair with bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) or (sub)total hysterectomy predispose survivors to psychosocial problems like marital disharmony. This study aims to evaluate obstetricians’ perspectives on surgical decision making in managing uterine rupture. Methods A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study of obstetricians at the 46th annual scientific conference of Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Nigeria in 2012. Data was analysed by descriptive and inferential statistics. Results Seventy-nine out of 110 obstetricians (71.8%) responded to the survey, of which 42 (53.2%) were consultants, 60 (75.9%) practised in government hospitals and 67 (84.8%) in urban hospitals, and all respondents managed women with uterine rupture. Previous cesarean scars and injudicious use of oxytocic are the commonest predisposing causes, and uterine rupture carries very high incidences of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Uterine repair only was commonly performed by 38 (48.1%) and uterine repair with BTL or (sub) total hysterectomy by 41 (51.9%) respondents. Surgical management is guided mainly by patients’ conditions and obstetricians’ surgical skills. Conclusion Obstetricians’ distribution in Nigeria leaves rural settings starved of specialist for obstetric emergencies. Caesarean scars are now a rising cause of ruptures. The surgical management of uterine rupture and obstetricians’ surgical preferences vary and are case scenario-dependent. Equitable redistribution of obstetricians and deployment of medical doctors to secondary hospitals in rural settings will make obstetric care more readily available and may reduce the prevalence and improve the outcome of uterine rupture. Obstetrician’s surgical decision-making should be guided by the prevailing case scenario and the ultimate aim should be to avert fatality and reduce morbidity.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1367-8UterineRuptureMaternalPerinatalMortalitySurgical option
spellingShingle Justus Ndulue Eze
Okechukwu Bonaventure Anozie
Osaheni Lucky Lawani
Emmanuel Okechukwu Ndukwe
Uzoma Maryrose Agwu
Johnson Akuma Obuna
Evaluation of obstetricians’ surgical decision making in the management of uterine rupture
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Uterine
Rupture
Maternal
Perinatal
Mortality
Surgical option
title Evaluation of obstetricians’ surgical decision making in the management of uterine rupture
title_full Evaluation of obstetricians’ surgical decision making in the management of uterine rupture
title_fullStr Evaluation of obstetricians’ surgical decision making in the management of uterine rupture
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of obstetricians’ surgical decision making in the management of uterine rupture
title_short Evaluation of obstetricians’ surgical decision making in the management of uterine rupture
title_sort evaluation of obstetricians surgical decision making in the management of uterine rupture
topic Uterine
Rupture
Maternal
Perinatal
Mortality
Surgical option
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1367-8
work_keys_str_mv AT justusndulueeze evaluationofobstetricianssurgicaldecisionmakinginthemanagementofuterinerupture
AT okechukwubonaventureanozie evaluationofobstetricianssurgicaldecisionmakinginthemanagementofuterinerupture
AT osaheniluckylawani evaluationofobstetricianssurgicaldecisionmakinginthemanagementofuterinerupture
AT emmanuelokechukwundukwe evaluationofobstetricianssurgicaldecisionmakinginthemanagementofuterinerupture
AT uzomamaryroseagwu evaluationofobstetricianssurgicaldecisionmakinginthemanagementofuterinerupture
AT johnsonakumaobuna evaluationofobstetricianssurgicaldecisionmakinginthemanagementofuterinerupture