Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds

Counterfactual attitudes like imagining, dreaming, and wishing create a problem for the standard formal semantic theory of de re attitude ascriptions. I show how the problem can be avoided if we represent an agent's attitudinal possibilities using "multi-centered worlds", possible wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dilip Ninan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linguistic Society of America 2012-08-01
Series:Semantics and Pragmatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://semprag.org/article/view/2815
_version_ 1818020924524331008
author Dilip Ninan
author_facet Dilip Ninan
author_sort Dilip Ninan
collection DOAJ
description Counterfactual attitudes like imagining, dreaming, and wishing create a problem for the standard formal semantic theory of de re attitude ascriptions. I show how the problem can be avoided if we represent an agent's attitudinal possibilities using "multi-centered worlds", possible worlds with multiple distinguished individuals, each of which represents an individual with whom the agent is acquainted. I then present a compositional semantics for de re ascriptions according to which singular terms are "assignment-sensitive" expressions and attitude verbs are "assignment shifters". http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.5 <a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/ninan-2012-article.bib">BibTeX info</a>
first_indexed 2024-04-14T08:12:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d87186a0d6c4ffdbf13de9fe4ce60a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1937-8912
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T08:12:01Z
publishDate 2012-08-01
publisher Linguistic Society of America
record_format Article
series Semantics and Pragmatics
spelling doaj.art-9d87186a0d6c4ffdbf13de9fe4ce60a52022-12-22T02:04:32ZengLinguistic Society of AmericaSemantics and Pragmatics1937-89122012-08-015015710.3765/sp.5.52500Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worldsDilip Ninan0Tufts UniversityCounterfactual attitudes like imagining, dreaming, and wishing create a problem for the standard formal semantic theory of de re attitude ascriptions. I show how the problem can be avoided if we represent an agent's attitudinal possibilities using "multi-centered worlds", possible worlds with multiple distinguished individuals, each of which represents an individual with whom the agent is acquainted. I then present a compositional semantics for de re ascriptions according to which singular terms are "assignment-sensitive" expressions and attitude verbs are "assignment shifters". http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.5 <a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/ninan-2012-article.bib">BibTeX info</a>http://semprag.org/article/view/2815de se attitudes, de re attitudes, counterfactual attitudes, pronouns, proper names, presupposition
spellingShingle Dilip Ninan
Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds
Semantics and Pragmatics
de se attitudes, de re attitudes, counterfactual attitudes, pronouns, proper names, presupposition
title Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds
title_full Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds
title_fullStr Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds
title_full_unstemmed Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds
title_short Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds
title_sort counterfactual attitudes and multi centered worlds
topic de se attitudes, de re attitudes, counterfactual attitudes, pronouns, proper names, presupposition
url http://semprag.org/article/view/2815
work_keys_str_mv AT dilipninan counterfactualattitudesandmulticenteredworlds