Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management

Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts. This definition links probiotic efficacy to microbial viability. The current gold standard assay for probiotic potency is enumeration using classical microbiology plating-based procedur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. L. Jane Weitzel, Christina S. Vegge, Marco Pane, Virginia S. Goldman, Binu Koshy, Cisse Hedegaard Porsby, Pierre Burguière, Jean L. Schoeni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.693066/full
_version_ 1818733544741011456
author M. L. Jane Weitzel
M. L. Jane Weitzel
Christina S. Vegge
Marco Pane
Virginia S. Goldman
Binu Koshy
Cisse Hedegaard Porsby
Pierre Burguière
Jean L. Schoeni
author_facet M. L. Jane Weitzel
M. L. Jane Weitzel
Christina S. Vegge
Marco Pane
Virginia S. Goldman
Binu Koshy
Cisse Hedegaard Porsby
Pierre Burguière
Jean L. Schoeni
author_sort M. L. Jane Weitzel
collection DOAJ
description Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts. This definition links probiotic efficacy to microbial viability. The current gold standard assay for probiotic potency is enumeration using classical microbiology plating-based procedures, yielding results in colony-forming units (CFU). One drawback to plating-based procedures is high variability due to intrinsic and extrinsic uncertainties. These uncertainties make comparison between analytical procedures challenging. In this article, we provide tools to reduce measurement uncertainty and strengthen the reliability of probiotic enumerations by using analytical procedure lifecycle management (APLM). APLM is a tool that uses a step-by-step process to define procedure performance based on the concept that the reportable value (final CFU result) must be fit for its intended use. Once the procedure performance is defined, the information gathered through APLM can be used to evaluate and compare procedures. Here, we discuss the theory behind applying APLM and give practical information about its application to CFU enumeration procedures for probiotics using a simulated example and data set. Data collected in a manufacturer’s development laboratory is included to support application of the concept. Implementation of APLM can lead to reduced variability by identifying specific factors (e.g., the dilution step) with significant impact on the variability and providing insights to procedural modifications that lead to process improvement. Understanding and control of the analytical procedure is improved by using these tools. The probiotics industry can confidently apply the information and analytical results generated to make decisions about processes and formulation, including overage requirements. One benefit of this approach is that companies can reduce overage costs. More reliable procedures for viable cell count determinations will improve the quality evaluation of probiotic products, and hence manufacturing procedures, while ensuring that products deliver clinically demonstrated beneficial doses.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T23:51:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d9aec8a1fbe445c87eb49b4a607fa9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-302X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T23:51:09Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-9d9aec8a1fbe445c87eb49b4a607fa9e2022-12-21T21:28:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2021-07-011210.3389/fmicb.2021.693066693066Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle ManagementM. L. Jane Weitzel0M. L. Jane Weitzel1Christina S. Vegge2Marco Pane3Virginia S. Goldman4Binu Koshy5Cisse Hedegaard Porsby6Pierre Burguière7Jean L. Schoeni8Expert Committee on Measurement and Data Quality, US Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, MD, United StatesIndependent Consultant, Winnipeg, MB, CanadaAnalytical Development, Bacthera, Hørsholm, DenmarkProbiotical Research Srl, Novara, ItalyScience Division, Department of Dietary Supplements and Herbal Medicines, US Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, MD, United StatesScience Division, Department of Dietary Supplements and Herbal Medicines, US Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, MD, United StatesAnalytical Development, Bacthera, Hørsholm, DenmarkAdvanced Microbial Analytics (AMA) Research Solutions, Lyon, FranceEurofins Microbiology Laboratory, Madison, WI, United StatesProbiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts. This definition links probiotic efficacy to microbial viability. The current gold standard assay for probiotic potency is enumeration using classical microbiology plating-based procedures, yielding results in colony-forming units (CFU). One drawback to plating-based procedures is high variability due to intrinsic and extrinsic uncertainties. These uncertainties make comparison between analytical procedures challenging. In this article, we provide tools to reduce measurement uncertainty and strengthen the reliability of probiotic enumerations by using analytical procedure lifecycle management (APLM). APLM is a tool that uses a step-by-step process to define procedure performance based on the concept that the reportable value (final CFU result) must be fit for its intended use. Once the procedure performance is defined, the information gathered through APLM can be used to evaluate and compare procedures. Here, we discuss the theory behind applying APLM and give practical information about its application to CFU enumeration procedures for probiotics using a simulated example and data set. Data collected in a manufacturer’s development laboratory is included to support application of the concept. Implementation of APLM can lead to reduced variability by identifying specific factors (e.g., the dilution step) with significant impact on the variability and providing insights to procedural modifications that lead to process improvement. Understanding and control of the analytical procedure is improved by using these tools. The probiotics industry can confidently apply the information and analytical results generated to make decisions about processes and formulation, including overage requirements. One benefit of this approach is that companies can reduce overage costs. More reliable procedures for viable cell count determinations will improve the quality evaluation of probiotic products, and hence manufacturing procedures, while ensuring that products deliver clinically demonstrated beneficial doses.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.693066/fullprobioticsUSPcolony-forming unitsenumerationanalytical procedure lifecycle managementanalytical target profile
spellingShingle M. L. Jane Weitzel
M. L. Jane Weitzel
Christina S. Vegge
Marco Pane
Virginia S. Goldman
Binu Koshy
Cisse Hedegaard Porsby
Pierre Burguière
Jean L. Schoeni
Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
Frontiers in Microbiology
probiotics
USP
colony-forming units
enumeration
analytical procedure lifecycle management
analytical target profile
title Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_full Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_fullStr Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_full_unstemmed Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_short Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_sort improving and comparing probiotic plate count methods by analytical procedure lifecycle management
topic probiotics
USP
colony-forming units
enumeration
analytical procedure lifecycle management
analytical target profile
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.693066/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mljaneweitzel improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT mljaneweitzel improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT christinasvegge improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT marcopane improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT virginiasgoldman improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT binukoshy improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT cissehedegaardporsby improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT pierreburguiere improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT jeanlschoeni improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement