Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Background Survivors of stroke face movement disability and increased cardiovascular disease and stroke risk. Treatment includes rehabilitation focused on functional movement with less emphasis on aerobic capacity. After rehabilitation, survivors of stroke must self‐manage activity with limited appr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth W. Regan, Reed Handlery, Michael W. Beets, Stacy L. Fritz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-08-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.012761
_version_ 1818315057120935936
author Elizabeth W. Regan
Reed Handlery
Michael W. Beets
Stacy L. Fritz
author_facet Elizabeth W. Regan
Reed Handlery
Michael W. Beets
Stacy L. Fritz
author_sort Elizabeth W. Regan
collection DOAJ
description Background Survivors of stroke face movement disability and increased cardiovascular disease and stroke risk. Treatment includes rehabilitation focused on functional movement with less emphasis on aerobic capacity. After rehabilitation, survivors of stroke must self‐manage activity with limited appropriate community programs. Lack of structured activity contributes to sedentary behavior. The objective of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to review aerobic programs for stroke survivors similar in activity and dosage to cardiac rehabilitation programs to determine their efficacy for improving aerobic and walking capacity. Methods and Results Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to review 5 databases. Group interventions for survivors of stroke with a primary aerobic component and dosage from 18 to 36 visits over 8 to 18 weeks (matching cardiac rehabilitation requirements in the United States) were included. The 6‐minute walk test, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2) peak, and walking speed were included as measures of aerobic capacity. Summary effect sizes and outcome measure mean differences were calculated for preintervention to postintervention, and summary effect sizes were calculated for preintervention to follow‐up. Activity type and initial 6‐minute walk test moderator analyses were performed. Nineteen studies with 23 eligible groups were selected. Survivors of stroke improved their composite aerobic capacity with an effect size of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.27–0.49). Studies including 6‐minute walk test demonstrated a pooled difference in means of 53.3 m (95% CI, 36.8–69.8 m). Follow‐up data were inconclusive. Conclusions Survivors of stroke benefit from aerobic programs with similar dosing to cardiac rehabilitation in the United States. The potential integration into existing programs could expand the community exercise options.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T08:59:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d9b260f66654ec4a8228353038a10e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T08:59:29Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-9d9b260f66654ec4a8228353038a10e82022-12-21T23:53:12ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802019-08-0181610.1161/JAHA.119.012761Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisElizabeth W. Regan0Reed Handlery1Michael W. Beets2Stacy L. Fritz3Department of Exercise Science University of South Carolina Columbia SCDepartment of Exercise Science University of South Carolina Columbia SCDepartment of Exercise Science University of South Carolina Columbia SCDepartment of Exercise Science University of South Carolina Columbia SCBackground Survivors of stroke face movement disability and increased cardiovascular disease and stroke risk. Treatment includes rehabilitation focused on functional movement with less emphasis on aerobic capacity. After rehabilitation, survivors of stroke must self‐manage activity with limited appropriate community programs. Lack of structured activity contributes to sedentary behavior. The objective of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to review aerobic programs for stroke survivors similar in activity and dosage to cardiac rehabilitation programs to determine their efficacy for improving aerobic and walking capacity. Methods and Results Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to review 5 databases. Group interventions for survivors of stroke with a primary aerobic component and dosage from 18 to 36 visits over 8 to 18 weeks (matching cardiac rehabilitation requirements in the United States) were included. The 6‐minute walk test, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2) peak, and walking speed were included as measures of aerobic capacity. Summary effect sizes and outcome measure mean differences were calculated for preintervention to postintervention, and summary effect sizes were calculated for preintervention to follow‐up. Activity type and initial 6‐minute walk test moderator analyses were performed. Nineteen studies with 23 eligible groups were selected. Survivors of stroke improved their composite aerobic capacity with an effect size of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.27–0.49). Studies including 6‐minute walk test demonstrated a pooled difference in means of 53.3 m (95% CI, 36.8–69.8 m). Follow‐up data were inconclusive. Conclusions Survivors of stroke benefit from aerobic programs with similar dosing to cardiac rehabilitation in the United States. The potential integration into existing programs could expand the community exercise options.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.012761cardiac rehabilitationexercisestrokestroke rehabilitation
spellingShingle Elizabeth W. Regan
Reed Handlery
Michael W. Beets
Stacy L. Fritz
Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
cardiac rehabilitation
exercise
stroke
stroke rehabilitation
title Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort are aerobic programs similar in design to cardiac rehabilitation beneficial for survivors of stroke a systematic review and meta analysis
topic cardiac rehabilitation
exercise
stroke
stroke rehabilitation
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.012761
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethwregan areaerobicprogramssimilarindesigntocardiacrehabilitationbeneficialforsurvivorsofstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reedhandlery areaerobicprogramssimilarindesigntocardiacrehabilitationbeneficialforsurvivorsofstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT michaelwbeets areaerobicprogramssimilarindesigntocardiacrehabilitationbeneficialforsurvivorsofstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stacylfritz areaerobicprogramssimilarindesigntocardiacrehabilitationbeneficialforsurvivorsofstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis