К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>*s</em> в <em>*š</em> в языках группы сатǝм

<p><strong>ON PRECONDITIONS AND STAGES OF THE TRANSITION OF IE *s TO </strong><strong><em>*š </em></strong><strong>IN THE LANGUAGES OF THE SAT</strong><strong>ǝ</strong><strong>M GROUP</strong></p><p><em>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Джой Иосифовна Едельман
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University 2011-12-01
Series:Baltistica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/816
_version_ 1819169986362474496
author Джой Иосифовна Едельман
author_facet Джой Иосифовна Едельман
author_sort Джой Иосифовна Едельман
collection DOAJ
description <p><strong>ON PRECONDITIONS AND STAGES OF THE TRANSITION OF IE *s TO </strong><strong><em>*š </em></strong><strong>IN THE LANGUAGES OF THE SAT</strong><strong>ǝ</strong><strong>M GROUP</strong></p><p><em>Summary</em></p><p>The data of the Aryan languages show that the process of transition of <em>*s </em>to <em>*š-</em>type<em> </em>sounds under certain phonetic (articulatory) conditions, which had begun in IE dialects of the Satǝm group in earlier times on the phonetic level, has resulted on phonological level in appearance of the opposi­tion <em>s</em>~<em>š </em>much later, after the Satǝm group had diverged into subgroups and even after the divergence of the Aryan protolanguage. The phonologization of the opposition <em>s</em>~<em>š </em>was proceeding in parallel, independent and not identical ways in each “branch“ (Indian, Iranian, and Nuristani — „Kafiri“) of the Aryan languages, and was closely connected with entire phonological systems of these languages.</p><p>Some „systematic exclusions“ witness that phonological <em>„ruki-</em>rule<em>“ </em>was not a distinctive fea­ture of the separation of the Satǝm group from other IE dialects (as well as the Aryan group from other Satǝm dialects). The change of <em>*s </em>to <em>*š</em>-type sounds in position after <em>*i</em>, <em>*r, *k, </em>and — in various dialects — after some other phonemes (in most of the dialects, after <em>*u</em> and later, in Iranian, after labial consonants, etc.) was only a common Satǝm phonetic tendency that accom­panied (to different degrees in different areas) much more significant transformations of IE pal­atal (and in some dialects, palatalized velar) consonants.</p><p>This tendency from the early times was often blocked up by processes of lexical, grammatical and phonetical analogy (different in various languages), which obscure the results of the <em>„ruki-</em>rule“.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-22T19:28:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d9df4402d834ef09d965b65719d5d39
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0132-6503
2345-0045
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-22T19:28:13Z
publishDate 2011-12-01
publisher Vilnius University
record_format Article
series Baltistica
spelling doaj.art-9d9df4402d834ef09d965b65719d5d392022-12-21T18:15:11ZdeuVilnius UniversityBaltistica0132-65032345-00452011-12-0104566610.15388/baltistica.0.4.816744К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>*s</em> в <em>*š</em> в языках группы сатǝмДжой Иосифовна Едельман<p><strong>ON PRECONDITIONS AND STAGES OF THE TRANSITION OF IE *s TO </strong><strong><em>*š </em></strong><strong>IN THE LANGUAGES OF THE SAT</strong><strong>ǝ</strong><strong>M GROUP</strong></p><p><em>Summary</em></p><p>The data of the Aryan languages show that the process of transition of <em>*s </em>to <em>*š-</em>type<em> </em>sounds under certain phonetic (articulatory) conditions, which had begun in IE dialects of the Satǝm group in earlier times on the phonetic level, has resulted on phonological level in appearance of the opposi­tion <em>s</em>~<em>š </em>much later, after the Satǝm group had diverged into subgroups and even after the divergence of the Aryan protolanguage. The phonologization of the opposition <em>s</em>~<em>š </em>was proceeding in parallel, independent and not identical ways in each “branch“ (Indian, Iranian, and Nuristani — „Kafiri“) of the Aryan languages, and was closely connected with entire phonological systems of these languages.</p><p>Some „systematic exclusions“ witness that phonological <em>„ruki-</em>rule<em>“ </em>was not a distinctive fea­ture of the separation of the Satǝm group from other IE dialects (as well as the Aryan group from other Satǝm dialects). The change of <em>*s </em>to <em>*š</em>-type sounds in position after <em>*i</em>, <em>*r, *k, </em>and — in various dialects — after some other phonemes (in most of the dialects, after <em>*u</em> and later, in Iranian, after labial consonants, etc.) was only a common Satǝm phonetic tendency that accom­panied (to different degrees in different areas) much more significant transformations of IE pal­atal (and in some dialects, palatalized velar) consonants.</p><p>This tendency from the early times was often blocked up by processes of lexical, grammatical and phonetical analogy (different in various languages), which obscure the results of the <em>„ruki-</em>rule“.</p>http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/816sateminės kalbos
spellingShingle Джой Иосифовна Едельман
К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>*s</em> в <em>*š</em> в языках группы сатǝм
Baltistica
sateminės kalbos
title К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>*s</em> в <em>*š</em> в языках группы сатǝм
title_full К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>*s</em> в <em>*š</em> в языках группы сатǝм
title_fullStr К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>*s</em> в <em>*š</em> в языках группы сатǝм
title_full_unstemmed К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>*s</em> в <em>*š</em> в языках группы сатǝм
title_short К предпосылкам и етапам перехода и.-е. <em>*s</em> в <em>*š</em> в языках группы сатǝм
title_sort к предпосылкам и етапам перехода и е em s em в em s em в языках группы сатǝм
topic sateminės kalbos
url http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/816
work_keys_str_mv AT džojiosifovnaedelʹman kpredposylkamietapamperehodaieemsemvemsemvâzykahgruppysatǝm