Misinterpretations of P-values and statistical tests persists among researchers and professionals working with statistics and epidemiology
Background: The aim was to investigate inferences of statistically significant test results among persons with more or less statistical education and research experience. Methods: A total of 75 doctoral students and 64 statisticians/epidemiologist responded to a web questionnaire about inferences of...
Main Authors: | Per Lytsy, Mikael Hartman, Ronnie Pingel |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Upsala Medical Society
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ujms.net/index.php/ujms/article/view/8760/14781 |
Similar Items
-
Frequentist and Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: An Intuitive Guide for Urologists and Clinicians
by: José Gaona, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
The reporting of p values, confidence intervals and statistical significance in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (1997–2017)
by: Locksley L. McV. Messam, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
Statistical Significance Testing for Mixed Priors: A Combined Bayesian and Frequentist Analysis
by: Jakob Robnik, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Reporting and interpreting non-significant results in animal cognition research
by: Benjamin G. Farrar, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
On the Influence of Religious Assumptions in Statistical Methods Used in Science
by: Cornelius Hunter
Published: (2020-12-01)