Conflicting regional policy goals: accessibility and segregation in the Helsinki metropolitan area

ABSTRACTRegional land use, housing, and transport (MAL) agreements between the Finnish state and municipalities in growth regions guide urban policy in the Helsinki metropolitan area towards regional cooperation and densification. Alongside economic growth and connectivity goals, segregation prevent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katriina Rosengren, Timo M. Kauppinen, Johanna Lilius, Jarkko Rasinkangas, Hannu Ruonavaara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Urban, Planning and Transport Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21650020.2023.2301063
_version_ 1797339229692362752
author Katriina Rosengren
Timo M. Kauppinen
Johanna Lilius
Jarkko Rasinkangas
Hannu Ruonavaara
author_facet Katriina Rosengren
Timo M. Kauppinen
Johanna Lilius
Jarkko Rasinkangas
Hannu Ruonavaara
author_sort Katriina Rosengren
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTRegional land use, housing, and transport (MAL) agreements between the Finnish state and municipalities in growth regions guide urban policy in the Helsinki metropolitan area towards regional cooperation and densification. Alongside economic growth and connectivity goals, segregation prevention is a visible but ill-defined social sustainability goal in these agreements, and anti-segregation measures lean heavily on providing new social housing in accessible locations. This tool, in turn, leans on a combination of social mixing, a traditional preventive tool in fighting segregation, and a new tool, maximising spatial justice through transit-oriented development. We argue that there is a discrepancy between these goals: while on an individual level, public transport accessibility is meant to reduce transport poverty and provide equal opportunities for employment and services, accessible areas fare lower than others in socioeconomic status. Therefore, increasing social rental housing in areas with lower socioeconomic status may unintentionally amplify segregation. This article asks how actors of different governance levels view concentrating social housing in accessible locations as a risk to segregation. Interviews show a concern of social challenges not being sufficiently addressed.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:42:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9dafd2046f314f2f8f84208bff4f3d9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2165-0020
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:42:56Z
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Urban, Planning and Transport Research
spelling doaj.art-9dafd2046f314f2f8f84208bff4f3d9b2024-01-30T00:43:01ZengTaylor & Francis GroupUrban, Planning and Transport Research2165-00202024-12-0112110.1080/21650020.2023.2301063Conflicting regional policy goals: accessibility and segregation in the Helsinki metropolitan areaKatriina Rosengren0Timo M. Kauppinen1Johanna Lilius2Jarkko Rasinkangas3Hannu Ruonavaara4Department of Social Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Turku, Turku, FinlandFinnish Institute for Health and WelfareSchool of Arts, Design, and Architecture, Aalto University, FinlandDepartment of Social Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Turku, Turku, FinlandDepartment of Social Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Turku, Turku, FinlandABSTRACTRegional land use, housing, and transport (MAL) agreements between the Finnish state and municipalities in growth regions guide urban policy in the Helsinki metropolitan area towards regional cooperation and densification. Alongside economic growth and connectivity goals, segregation prevention is a visible but ill-defined social sustainability goal in these agreements, and anti-segregation measures lean heavily on providing new social housing in accessible locations. This tool, in turn, leans on a combination of social mixing, a traditional preventive tool in fighting segregation, and a new tool, maximising spatial justice through transit-oriented development. We argue that there is a discrepancy between these goals: while on an individual level, public transport accessibility is meant to reduce transport poverty and provide equal opportunities for employment and services, accessible areas fare lower than others in socioeconomic status. Therefore, increasing social rental housing in areas with lower socioeconomic status may unintentionally amplify segregation. This article asks how actors of different governance levels view concentrating social housing in accessible locations as a risk to segregation. Interviews show a concern of social challenges not being sufficiently addressed.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21650020.2023.2301063Segregationaccessibilityregional policiessocial housingFinland
spellingShingle Katriina Rosengren
Timo M. Kauppinen
Johanna Lilius
Jarkko Rasinkangas
Hannu Ruonavaara
Conflicting regional policy goals: accessibility and segregation in the Helsinki metropolitan area
Urban, Planning and Transport Research
Segregation
accessibility
regional policies
social housing
Finland
title Conflicting regional policy goals: accessibility and segregation in the Helsinki metropolitan area
title_full Conflicting regional policy goals: accessibility and segregation in the Helsinki metropolitan area
title_fullStr Conflicting regional policy goals: accessibility and segregation in the Helsinki metropolitan area
title_full_unstemmed Conflicting regional policy goals: accessibility and segregation in the Helsinki metropolitan area
title_short Conflicting regional policy goals: accessibility and segregation in the Helsinki metropolitan area
title_sort conflicting regional policy goals accessibility and segregation in the helsinki metropolitan area
topic Segregation
accessibility
regional policies
social housing
Finland
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21650020.2023.2301063
work_keys_str_mv AT katriinarosengren conflictingregionalpolicygoalsaccessibilityandsegregationinthehelsinkimetropolitanarea
AT timomkauppinen conflictingregionalpolicygoalsaccessibilityandsegregationinthehelsinkimetropolitanarea
AT johannalilius conflictingregionalpolicygoalsaccessibilityandsegregationinthehelsinkimetropolitanarea
AT jarkkorasinkangas conflictingregionalpolicygoalsaccessibilityandsegregationinthehelsinkimetropolitanarea
AT hannuruonavaara conflictingregionalpolicygoalsaccessibilityandsegregationinthehelsinkimetropolitanarea