Evaluation of the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Type 1 Diabetes in Canada

Stephane Roze,1 John J Isitt,1 Jayne Smith-Palmer,2 Peter Lynch3 1Vyoo Agency, Paris, France; 2Ossian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland; 3Dexcom, San Diego, CA, USACorrespondence: Jayne Smith-PalmerOssian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, Basel, 4051,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roze S, Isitt JJ, Smith-Palmer J, Lynch P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-08-01
Series:ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/evaluation-of-the-long-term-cost-effectiveness-of-the-dexcom-g6-contin-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CEOR
_version_ 1818606955179016192
author Roze S
Isitt JJ
Smith-Palmer J
Lynch P
author_facet Roze S
Isitt JJ
Smith-Palmer J
Lynch P
author_sort Roze S
collection DOAJ
description Stephane Roze,1 John J Isitt,1 Jayne Smith-Palmer,2 Peter Lynch3 1Vyoo Agency, Paris, France; 2Ossian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland; 3Dexcom, San Diego, CA, USACorrespondence: Jayne Smith-PalmerOssian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, Basel, 4051, SwitzerlandTel +41 61 271 6214Email smith-palmer@ossianconsulting.comBackground: The Dexcom G6 real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) system is one of the most sophisticated RT-CGM systems developed to date and became available in Canada in 2019. A health economic analysis was performed to determine the long-term cost-effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 RT-CGM system versus SMBG in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Canada.Methods: The analysis was performed using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model. Based on clinical trial data, patients with mean baseline HbA1c of 8.6% were assumed to have a HbA1c reduction of 1.0% with RT-CGM versus 0.4% reduction with SMBG. RT-CGM was also associated with a quality of life (QoL) benefit owing to reduced incidence of hypoglycemia, reduced fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) and elimination of fingerstick testing. Direct medical costs were sourced from published literature, and inflated to 2019 Canadian dollars (CAD).Results: Dexcom G6 RT-CGM was projected to improve mean quality-adjusted life expectancy by 2.09 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) relative to SMBG (15.52 versus 13.43 QALYs) but mean total lifetime cots were CAD 35,353 higher with RT-CGM (CAD 227,357 versus CAD 192,004) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAD 16,931 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses revealed that assumptions relating to the QoL benefit associated with reduced FoH and the elimination of fingerstick testing with RT-CGM as well as SMBG usage and change in HbA1c were the key drivers of cost-effectiveness.Conclusion: For adults with T1D in Canada, RT-CGM is associated with improved glycemic control and QoL benefits owing to a reduced FoH and elimination of the requirement for fingerstick testing and over a lifetime time horizon is cost-effective relative to SMBG.Keywords: type 1 diabetes, Canada, real-time continuous glucose monitoring, cost-effectiveness
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:19:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9db270063c094f13bedcc94bef5962b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-6981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:19:04Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj.art-9db270063c094f13bedcc94bef5962b92022-12-21T22:28:34ZengDove Medical PressClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research1178-69812021-08-01Volume 1371772567749Evaluation of the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Type 1 Diabetes in CanadaRoze SIsitt JJSmith-Palmer JLynch PStephane Roze,1 John J Isitt,1 Jayne Smith-Palmer,2 Peter Lynch3 1Vyoo Agency, Paris, France; 2Ossian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland; 3Dexcom, San Diego, CA, USACorrespondence: Jayne Smith-PalmerOssian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, Basel, 4051, SwitzerlandTel +41 61 271 6214Email smith-palmer@ossianconsulting.comBackground: The Dexcom G6 real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) system is one of the most sophisticated RT-CGM systems developed to date and became available in Canada in 2019. A health economic analysis was performed to determine the long-term cost-effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 RT-CGM system versus SMBG in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Canada.Methods: The analysis was performed using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model. Based on clinical trial data, patients with mean baseline HbA1c of 8.6% were assumed to have a HbA1c reduction of 1.0% with RT-CGM versus 0.4% reduction with SMBG. RT-CGM was also associated with a quality of life (QoL) benefit owing to reduced incidence of hypoglycemia, reduced fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) and elimination of fingerstick testing. Direct medical costs were sourced from published literature, and inflated to 2019 Canadian dollars (CAD).Results: Dexcom G6 RT-CGM was projected to improve mean quality-adjusted life expectancy by 2.09 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) relative to SMBG (15.52 versus 13.43 QALYs) but mean total lifetime cots were CAD 35,353 higher with RT-CGM (CAD 227,357 versus CAD 192,004) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAD 16,931 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses revealed that assumptions relating to the QoL benefit associated with reduced FoH and the elimination of fingerstick testing with RT-CGM as well as SMBG usage and change in HbA1c were the key drivers of cost-effectiveness.Conclusion: For adults with T1D in Canada, RT-CGM is associated with improved glycemic control and QoL benefits owing to a reduced FoH and elimination of the requirement for fingerstick testing and over a lifetime time horizon is cost-effective relative to SMBG.Keywords: type 1 diabetes, Canada, real-time continuous glucose monitoring, cost-effectivenesshttps://www.dovepress.com/evaluation-of-the-long-term-cost-effectiveness-of-the-dexcom-g6-contin-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CEORtype 1 diabetescanadareal-time continuous glucose monitoringcost-effectiveness
spellingShingle Roze S
Isitt JJ
Smith-Palmer J
Lynch P
Evaluation of the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Type 1 Diabetes in Canada
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
type 1 diabetes
canada
real-time continuous glucose monitoring
cost-effectiveness
title Evaluation of the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Type 1 Diabetes in Canada
title_full Evaluation of the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Type 1 Diabetes in Canada
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Type 1 Diabetes in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Type 1 Diabetes in Canada
title_short Evaluation of the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Type 1 Diabetes in Canada
title_sort evaluation of the long term cost effectiveness of the dexcom g6 continuous glucose monitor versus self monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 1 diabetes in canada
topic type 1 diabetes
canada
real-time continuous glucose monitoring
cost-effectiveness
url https://www.dovepress.com/evaluation-of-the-long-term-cost-effectiveness-of-the-dexcom-g6-contin-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CEOR
work_keys_str_mv AT rozes evaluationofthelongtermcosteffectivenessofthedexcomg6continuousglucosemonitorversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinpeoplewithtype1diabetesincanada
AT isittjj evaluationofthelongtermcosteffectivenessofthedexcomg6continuousglucosemonitorversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinpeoplewithtype1diabetesincanada
AT smithpalmerj evaluationofthelongtermcosteffectivenessofthedexcomg6continuousglucosemonitorversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinpeoplewithtype1diabetesincanada
AT lynchp evaluationofthelongtermcosteffectivenessofthedexcomg6continuousglucosemonitorversusselfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinpeoplewithtype1diabetesincanada