The effects of various mouthwashes on osteoblast precursor cells

This study examined whether or not various mouthwashes have significant effects on the viability or morphology of mouse osteoblast-like cells. Mouse calvarial preosteoblast cells were cultured and prepared, then treated with a 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solution containing essential oils with o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Song In-Seok, Lee Ji Eun, Park Jun-Beom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019-07-01
Series:Open Life Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2019-0042
_version_ 1818729622286630912
author Song In-Seok
Lee Ji Eun
Park Jun-Beom
author_facet Song In-Seok
Lee Ji Eun
Park Jun-Beom
author_sort Song In-Seok
collection DOAJ
description This study examined whether or not various mouthwashes have significant effects on the viability or morphology of mouse osteoblast-like cells. Mouse calvarial preosteoblast cells were cultured and prepared, then treated with a 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solution containing essential oils with or without alcohol, and a cetylpyridinium chloride solution, and sodium fluoride, respectively. Each well was treated with one of six mouthwashes for either 30 sec, 1.5 min, or 4.5 min. The viability of the treated cells was quantitatively analyzed by a Cell Counting Kit-8. The viability of osteogenic progenitor cells decreased significantly irrespectively of the types of mouthwashes. The changes of cell morphology were seen in all groups of mouthwashes; however, they were more noticeable on the chlorhexidine digluconate-treated group. A progressive increase in treatment time over 30 sec did not seem to deteriorate cellular viability. There was no significant difference in viability or morphological change between different formulations of the same brand. Although various mouthwashes without alcohol as an ingredient are available, nonalcoholic mouthwashes were not likely to be less harmful to the cells. Collectively, commercially available mouthwashes could inhibit cell viability and alter the morphology of osteoblastic precursor cells irrespectively of brands, treatment time, or alcohol content.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T22:48:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9db46dc1bc8f4a8295e13a18d2f7e602
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2391-5412
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T22:48:49Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Open Life Sciences
spelling doaj.art-9db46dc1bc8f4a8295e13a18d2f7e6022022-12-21T21:29:43ZengDe GruyterOpen Life Sciences2391-54122019-07-0114137638310.1515/biol-2019-0042biol-2019-0042The effects of various mouthwashes on osteoblast precursor cellsSong In-Seok0Lee Ji Eun1Park Jun-Beom2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, 02841, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Periodontics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Periodontics, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of KoreaThis study examined whether or not various mouthwashes have significant effects on the viability or morphology of mouse osteoblast-like cells. Mouse calvarial preosteoblast cells were cultured and prepared, then treated with a 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solution containing essential oils with or without alcohol, and a cetylpyridinium chloride solution, and sodium fluoride, respectively. Each well was treated with one of six mouthwashes for either 30 sec, 1.5 min, or 4.5 min. The viability of the treated cells was quantitatively analyzed by a Cell Counting Kit-8. The viability of osteogenic progenitor cells decreased significantly irrespectively of the types of mouthwashes. The changes of cell morphology were seen in all groups of mouthwashes; however, they were more noticeable on the chlorhexidine digluconate-treated group. A progressive increase in treatment time over 30 sec did not seem to deteriorate cellular viability. There was no significant difference in viability or morphological change between different formulations of the same brand. Although various mouthwashes without alcohol as an ingredient are available, nonalcoholic mouthwashes were not likely to be less harmful to the cells. Collectively, commercially available mouthwashes could inhibit cell viability and alter the morphology of osteoblastic precursor cells irrespectively of brands, treatment time, or alcohol content.https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2019-0042mouthwashesosteoblastscell survival
spellingShingle Song In-Seok
Lee Ji Eun
Park Jun-Beom
The effects of various mouthwashes on osteoblast precursor cells
Open Life Sciences
mouthwashes
osteoblasts
cell survival
title The effects of various mouthwashes on osteoblast precursor cells
title_full The effects of various mouthwashes on osteoblast precursor cells
title_fullStr The effects of various mouthwashes on osteoblast precursor cells
title_full_unstemmed The effects of various mouthwashes on osteoblast precursor cells
title_short The effects of various mouthwashes on osteoblast precursor cells
title_sort effects of various mouthwashes on osteoblast precursor cells
topic mouthwashes
osteoblasts
cell survival
url https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2019-0042
work_keys_str_mv AT songinseok theeffectsofvariousmouthwashesonosteoblastprecursorcells
AT leejieun theeffectsofvariousmouthwashesonosteoblastprecursorcells
AT parkjunbeom theeffectsofvariousmouthwashesonosteoblastprecursorcells
AT songinseok effectsofvariousmouthwashesonosteoblastprecursorcells
AT leejieun effectsofvariousmouthwashesonosteoblastprecursorcells
AT parkjunbeom effectsofvariousmouthwashesonosteoblastprecursorcells