Interview with an avatar: Comparing online and virtual reality perspective taking for gender bias in STEM hiring decisions

Virtual perspective taking can reduce unconscious bias and increase empathy and prosocial behavior toward individuals who are marginalized based on group stereotypes such as age, race, or socioeconomic status. However, the question remains whether this approach might reduce implicit gender bias, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cassandra L. Crone, Rachel W. Kallen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173647/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1818471028173570048
author Cassandra L. Crone
Rachel W. Kallen
author_facet Cassandra L. Crone
Rachel W. Kallen
author_sort Cassandra L. Crone
collection DOAJ
description Virtual perspective taking can reduce unconscious bias and increase empathy and prosocial behavior toward individuals who are marginalized based on group stereotypes such as age, race, or socioeconomic status. However, the question remains whether this approach might reduce implicit gender bias, and the degree to which virtual immersion contributes to behavioral modulation following perspective taking tasks is unknown. Accordingly, we investigate the role of virtual perspective taking for binary gender using an online platform (Study 1) and immersive virtual reality (Study 2). Female and male undergraduates performed a simulated interview while virtually represented by an avatar that was either congruent or incongruent with their own gender. All participants rated a male and a female candidate on competence, hireability, likeability, empathy, and interpersonal closeness and then chose one of these two equivalently qualified candidates to hire for a laboratory assistant position in the male dominated industry of information technology. Online perspective taking did not reveal a significant influence of avatar gender on candidate ratings or candidate choice, whereas virtual reality perspective taking resulted in significant changes to participant behavior following exposure to a gender-incongruent avatar (e.g., male embodied as female), such that men showed preference for the female candidate and women showed preference for the male candidate. Although between-group differences in candidate ratings were subtle, rating trends were consistent with substantial differences in candidate choice, and this effect was greater for men. Compared to an online approach, virtual reality perspective taking appears to exert greater influence on acute behavioral modulation for gender bias due to its ability to fully immerse participants in the experience of (temporarily) becoming someone else, with empathy as a potential mechanism underlying this phenomenon.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:45:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9dcce534af1e494caed4ea8e75db5f5a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:45:34Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-9dcce534af1e494caed4ea8e75db5f5a2022-12-22T02:28:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01176Interview with an avatar: Comparing online and virtual reality perspective taking for gender bias in STEM hiring decisionsCassandra L. CroneRachel W. KallenVirtual perspective taking can reduce unconscious bias and increase empathy and prosocial behavior toward individuals who are marginalized based on group stereotypes such as age, race, or socioeconomic status. However, the question remains whether this approach might reduce implicit gender bias, and the degree to which virtual immersion contributes to behavioral modulation following perspective taking tasks is unknown. Accordingly, we investigate the role of virtual perspective taking for binary gender using an online platform (Study 1) and immersive virtual reality (Study 2). Female and male undergraduates performed a simulated interview while virtually represented by an avatar that was either congruent or incongruent with their own gender. All participants rated a male and a female candidate on competence, hireability, likeability, empathy, and interpersonal closeness and then chose one of these two equivalently qualified candidates to hire for a laboratory assistant position in the male dominated industry of information technology. Online perspective taking did not reveal a significant influence of avatar gender on candidate ratings or candidate choice, whereas virtual reality perspective taking resulted in significant changes to participant behavior following exposure to a gender-incongruent avatar (e.g., male embodied as female), such that men showed preference for the female candidate and women showed preference for the male candidate. Although between-group differences in candidate ratings were subtle, rating trends were consistent with substantial differences in candidate choice, and this effect was greater for men. Compared to an online approach, virtual reality perspective taking appears to exert greater influence on acute behavioral modulation for gender bias due to its ability to fully immerse participants in the experience of (temporarily) becoming someone else, with empathy as a potential mechanism underlying this phenomenon.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173647/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Cassandra L. Crone
Rachel W. Kallen
Interview with an avatar: Comparing online and virtual reality perspective taking for gender bias in STEM hiring decisions
PLoS ONE
title Interview with an avatar: Comparing online and virtual reality perspective taking for gender bias in STEM hiring decisions
title_full Interview with an avatar: Comparing online and virtual reality perspective taking for gender bias in STEM hiring decisions
title_fullStr Interview with an avatar: Comparing online and virtual reality perspective taking for gender bias in STEM hiring decisions
title_full_unstemmed Interview with an avatar: Comparing online and virtual reality perspective taking for gender bias in STEM hiring decisions
title_short Interview with an avatar: Comparing online and virtual reality perspective taking for gender bias in STEM hiring decisions
title_sort interview with an avatar comparing online and virtual reality perspective taking for gender bias in stem hiring decisions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173647/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT cassandralcrone interviewwithanavatarcomparingonlineandvirtualrealityperspectivetakingforgenderbiasinstemhiringdecisions
AT rachelwkallen interviewwithanavatarcomparingonlineandvirtualrealityperspectivetakingforgenderbiasinstemhiringdecisions