Intuition and evidential facts in Carnap’s analysis of space

One of the reasons for Carnap’s (1922) analysis of space was the confounding status of many arguments around the state of the art on that topic at that time. The unsatisfactory views supplied by mathematicians, physicists and philosophers led Carnap to propose a new conception of space. His proposal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juan Bautista Bengoetxea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editora Universitária Champagnat - PUCPRESS 2019-12-01
Series:Revista de Filosofia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/25339
_version_ 1797334552035721216
author Juan Bautista Bengoetxea
author_facet Juan Bautista Bengoetxea
author_sort Juan Bautista Bengoetxea
collection DOAJ
description One of the reasons for Carnap’s (1922) analysis of space was the confounding status of many arguments around the state of the art on that topic at that time. The unsatisfactory views supplied by mathematicians, physicists and philosophers led Carnap to propose a new conception of space. His proposal, which employs the notion of intuition as a fundamental tool, fared better, but clashed with his conventionalists intentions derived from an allegedly tolerant attitude. The notion of intuition here examined allows us to claim that Carnap’s target was also an objectivist epistemological program dependent on certain realistic reminiscences embodied in the notion of evidence or matter of fact (Tatbestand).
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:22:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9de063e6145344a88a469a1977a0e787
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0104-4443
1980-5934
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T08:22:28Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Editora Universitária Champagnat - PUCPRESS
record_format Article
series Revista de Filosofia
spelling doaj.art-9de063e6145344a88a469a1977a0e7872024-02-02T05:30:04ZengEditora Universitária Champagnat - PUCPRESSRevista de Filosofia0104-44431980-59342019-12-01315410.7213/1980-5934.31.054.AO0122909Intuition and evidential facts in Carnap’s analysis of spaceJuan Bautista Bengoetxea0SENIOR LECTURER UNIVERSITY OF THE BALEARIC ISLANDSOne of the reasons for Carnap’s (1922) analysis of space was the confounding status of many arguments around the state of the art on that topic at that time. The unsatisfactory views supplied by mathematicians, physicists and philosophers led Carnap to propose a new conception of space. His proposal, which employs the notion of intuition as a fundamental tool, fared better, but clashed with his conventionalists intentions derived from an allegedly tolerant attitude. The notion of intuition here examined allows us to claim that Carnap’s target was also an objectivist epistemological program dependent on certain realistic reminiscences embodied in the notion of evidence or matter of fact (Tatbestand).https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/25339objectivity, intuition, conventionalism, evidence, tolerance
spellingShingle Juan Bautista Bengoetxea
Intuition and evidential facts in Carnap’s analysis of space
Revista de Filosofia
objectivity, intuition, conventionalism, evidence, tolerance
title Intuition and evidential facts in Carnap’s analysis of space
title_full Intuition and evidential facts in Carnap’s analysis of space
title_fullStr Intuition and evidential facts in Carnap’s analysis of space
title_full_unstemmed Intuition and evidential facts in Carnap’s analysis of space
title_short Intuition and evidential facts in Carnap’s analysis of space
title_sort intuition and evidential facts in carnap s analysis of space
topic objectivity, intuition, conventionalism, evidence, tolerance
url https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/25339
work_keys_str_mv AT juanbautistabengoetxea intuitionandevidentialfactsincarnapsanalysisofspace