Erroneous sea-ice concentration retrieval in the East Antarctic

Large discrepancies have been observed between satellite-derived sea-ice concentrations(IC) from passive microwave remote sensing and those derived from optical images at several locations in the East Antarctic, between February and April 2014. These artefacts, that resemble polynyas in the IC maps,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoi Ming Lam, Gunnar Spreen, Georg Heygster, Christian Melsheimer, Neal W. Young
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2018-07-01
Series:Annals of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0260305518000010/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811157305819922432
author Hoi Ming Lam
Gunnar Spreen
Georg Heygster
Christian Melsheimer
Neal W. Young
author_facet Hoi Ming Lam
Gunnar Spreen
Georg Heygster
Christian Melsheimer
Neal W. Young
author_sort Hoi Ming Lam
collection DOAJ
description Large discrepancies have been observed between satellite-derived sea-ice concentrations(IC) from passive microwave remote sensing and those derived from optical images at several locations in the East Antarctic, between February and April 2014. These artefacts, that resemble polynyas in the IC maps, appear in areas where optical satellite data show that there is landfast sea ice. The IC datasets and the corresponding retrieval algorithms are investigated together with microwave brightness temperature, air temperature, snowfall and bathymetry to understand the failure of the IC retrieval. The artefacts are the result of the application of weather filters in retrieval algorithms. These filters use the 37 and 19 GHz channels to correct for atmospheric effects on the retrieval. These channels show significant departures from typical ranges when the artefacts occur. A melt–refreeze cycle with associated snow metamorphism is proposed as the most likely cause. Together, the areas of the artefacts account for up to 0.5% of the Antarctic sea-ice area and thus cause a bias in sea-IC time series. In addition, erroneous sea ICs can adversely affect shipping operations.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:05:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9dfc29868e3746f6b961dba358477bfe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0260-3055
1727-5644
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:05:02Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Annals of Glaciology
spelling doaj.art-9dfc29868e3746f6b961dba358477bfe2023-03-09T12:27:34ZengCambridge University PressAnnals of Glaciology0260-30551727-56442018-07-015920121210.1017/aog.2018.1Erroneous sea-ice concentration retrieval in the East AntarcticHoi Ming Lam0Gunnar Spreen1Georg Heygster2Christian Melsheimer3Neal W. Young4Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany E-mail:Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany E-mail:Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany E-mail:Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany E-mail:Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, AustraliaLarge discrepancies have been observed between satellite-derived sea-ice concentrations(IC) from passive microwave remote sensing and those derived from optical images at several locations in the East Antarctic, between February and April 2014. These artefacts, that resemble polynyas in the IC maps, appear in areas where optical satellite data show that there is landfast sea ice. The IC datasets and the corresponding retrieval algorithms are investigated together with microwave brightness temperature, air temperature, snowfall and bathymetry to understand the failure of the IC retrieval. The artefacts are the result of the application of weather filters in retrieval algorithms. These filters use the 37 and 19 GHz channels to correct for atmospheric effects on the retrieval. These channels show significant departures from typical ranges when the artefacts occur. A melt–refreeze cycle with associated snow metamorphism is proposed as the most likely cause. Together, the areas of the artefacts account for up to 0.5% of the Antarctic sea-ice area and thus cause a bias in sea-IC time series. In addition, erroneous sea ICs can adversely affect shipping operations.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0260305518000010/type/journal_articleatmosphere/ice/ocean interactionsremote sensingsea icesea-ice geophysics
spellingShingle Hoi Ming Lam
Gunnar Spreen
Georg Heygster
Christian Melsheimer
Neal W. Young
Erroneous sea-ice concentration retrieval in the East Antarctic
Annals of Glaciology
atmosphere/ice/ocean interactions
remote sensing
sea ice
sea-ice geophysics
title Erroneous sea-ice concentration retrieval in the East Antarctic
title_full Erroneous sea-ice concentration retrieval in the East Antarctic
title_fullStr Erroneous sea-ice concentration retrieval in the East Antarctic
title_full_unstemmed Erroneous sea-ice concentration retrieval in the East Antarctic
title_short Erroneous sea-ice concentration retrieval in the East Antarctic
title_sort erroneous sea ice concentration retrieval in the east antarctic
topic atmosphere/ice/ocean interactions
remote sensing
sea ice
sea-ice geophysics
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0260305518000010/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT hoiminglam erroneousseaiceconcentrationretrievalintheeastantarctic
AT gunnarspreen erroneousseaiceconcentrationretrievalintheeastantarctic
AT georgheygster erroneousseaiceconcentrationretrievalintheeastantarctic
AT christianmelsheimer erroneousseaiceconcentrationretrievalintheeastantarctic
AT nealwyoung erroneousseaiceconcentrationretrievalintheeastantarctic