Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial
Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different gap filling materials in immediate implant in anterior and premolar regions of maxilla. Materials and methods Thirty-six implants were inserted in patients seeking for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premo...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | BMC Oral Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03678-5 |
| _version_ | 1797397764362993664 |
|---|---|
| author | Heba Abo-Elfetouh Elsheikh Sally Elsayed Abdelsameaa Ahmed Adel Elbahnasi Fakhreldin Hassan Abdel-Rahman |
| author_facet | Heba Abo-Elfetouh Elsheikh Sally Elsayed Abdelsameaa Ahmed Adel Elbahnasi Fakhreldin Hassan Abdel-Rahman |
| author_sort | Heba Abo-Elfetouh Elsheikh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different gap filling materials in immediate implant in anterior and premolar regions of maxilla. Materials and methods Thirty-six implants were inserted in patients seeking for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premolar teeth (esthetic zone) by immediate implant. Patients were randomly distributed into three equal groups, twelve implants in each group. Group 1 received Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) into the jumping distance, Group 2 received Xenograft into the jumping distance and Group 3 received Alloplastic bone grafting material into the jumping distance. Implant stability by measuring the changes in Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), peri-implant pocket depth, marginal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness were evaluated during follow up periods. All the clinical and radiographic data were subjected to statistical analysis by One Way ANOVA test and the Post Hoc Tukey test. Results This study involved 19 female patients and 17 male patients who received 36 dental implants. There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding implant stability, peri-implant pocket depth and palatal bone loss, while there was a significant difference between PRF Group (Group 1) and the other Groups regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness. Conclusion PRF can be used as a gap filling material in conjunction with immediate implant placement, but other bone grafting materials give superior result regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness. Trial registration The study was listed on www.clinicaltrials.gov with registration number (NCT05878392) on 26/05/2023. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, approved the current study in compliance with the seventh revision of the Helsinki Declaration in 2013 (A0103023OS). |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T01:14:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9e17b4ad909e4838b82138eaf97f8ea3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6831 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T01:14:51Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Oral Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-9e17b4ad909e4838b82138eaf97f8ea32023-12-10T12:33:54ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312023-12-0123111310.1186/s12903-023-03678-5Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trialHeba Abo-Elfetouh Elsheikh0Sally Elsayed Abdelsameaa1Ahmed Adel Elbahnasi2Fakhreldin Hassan Abdel-Rahman3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura UniversityOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura UniversityFixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura UniversityOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura UniversityAbstract Background This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different gap filling materials in immediate implant in anterior and premolar regions of maxilla. Materials and methods Thirty-six implants were inserted in patients seeking for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premolar teeth (esthetic zone) by immediate implant. Patients were randomly distributed into three equal groups, twelve implants in each group. Group 1 received Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) into the jumping distance, Group 2 received Xenograft into the jumping distance and Group 3 received Alloplastic bone grafting material into the jumping distance. Implant stability by measuring the changes in Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), peri-implant pocket depth, marginal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness were evaluated during follow up periods. All the clinical and radiographic data were subjected to statistical analysis by One Way ANOVA test and the Post Hoc Tukey test. Results This study involved 19 female patients and 17 male patients who received 36 dental implants. There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding implant stability, peri-implant pocket depth and palatal bone loss, while there was a significant difference between PRF Group (Group 1) and the other Groups regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness. Conclusion PRF can be used as a gap filling material in conjunction with immediate implant placement, but other bone grafting materials give superior result regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness. Trial registration The study was listed on www.clinicaltrials.gov with registration number (NCT05878392) on 26/05/2023. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, approved the current study in compliance with the seventh revision of the Helsinki Declaration in 2013 (A0103023OS).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03678-5Alloplastic bone grafting materialBuccal bone thicknessImmediate implant placementMarginal bone lossPlatelet Rich FibrinTooth extraction |
| spellingShingle | Heba Abo-Elfetouh Elsheikh Sally Elsayed Abdelsameaa Ahmed Adel Elbahnasi Fakhreldin Hassan Abdel-Rahman Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial BMC Oral Health Alloplastic bone grafting material Buccal bone thickness Immediate implant placement Marginal bone loss Platelet Rich Fibrin Tooth extraction |
| title | Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_full | Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_fullStr | Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_short | Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_sort | comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement a randomized clinical trial |
| topic | Alloplastic bone grafting material Buccal bone thickness Immediate implant placement Marginal bone loss Platelet Rich Fibrin Tooth extraction |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03678-5 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hebaaboelfetouhelsheikh comparisonbetweenplateletrichfibrinasspacefillingmaterialversusxenograftandalloplasticbonegraftingmaterialsinimmediateimplantplacementarandomizedclinicaltrial AT sallyelsayedabdelsameaa comparisonbetweenplateletrichfibrinasspacefillingmaterialversusxenograftandalloplasticbonegraftingmaterialsinimmediateimplantplacementarandomizedclinicaltrial AT ahmedadelelbahnasi comparisonbetweenplateletrichfibrinasspacefillingmaterialversusxenograftandalloplasticbonegraftingmaterialsinimmediateimplantplacementarandomizedclinicaltrial AT fakhreldinhassanabdelrahman comparisonbetweenplateletrichfibrinasspacefillingmaterialversusxenograftandalloplasticbonegraftingmaterialsinimmediateimplantplacementarandomizedclinicaltrial |