Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms

Recent research has examined how often mind-wandering occurs about past versus future events. However, mind-wandering may also be atemporal, although previous investigations of this possibility have not yielded consistent results. Indeed, it is unclear what proportion of mind-wandering is atemporal,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan David Jackson, Yana eWeinstein, David Anthony Balota
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00742/full
_version_ 1819274862324088832
author Jonathan David Jackson
Yana eWeinstein
David Anthony Balota
author_facet Jonathan David Jackson
Yana eWeinstein
David Anthony Balota
author_sort Jonathan David Jackson
collection DOAJ
description Recent research has examined how often mind-wandering occurs about past versus future events. However, mind-wandering may also be atemporal, although previous investigations of this possibility have not yielded consistent results. Indeed, it is unclear what proportion of mind-wandering is atemporal, and also how an atemporal response option would affect the future oriented bias often reported during low-demand tasks used to measure mind-wandering. The present study examined self-reported (Experiment 1) and probe-caught (Experiment 2) mind-wandering using the low-demand Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) in younger (18-30) and older (50-73) adults in an experimental paradigm developed to measure mind-wandering in a sample using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Across self-reported and probe-caught mind-wandering, the atemporal response option was used at least as frequently as past or future mind-wandering options. Although older adults reported far fewer mind-wandering events, they showed a very similar temporal pattern to younger adults. Most importantly, inclusion of the atemporal report option affected performance on the SART and selectively eliminated the prospective bias in self-reported mind-wandering, but not in probe-caught mind-wandering. These results suggest that both young and older participants are often not thinking of past or future events when mind-wandering, but are thinking of events that cannot easily be categorized as either.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T23:15:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9e2e223ca9bd4f8aa0c1690e9f23ddf7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T23:15:10Z
publishDate 2013-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-9e2e223ca9bd4f8aa0c1690e9f23ddf72022-12-21T17:26:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782013-10-01410.3389/fpsyg.2013.0074260783Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigmsJonathan David Jackson0Yana eWeinstein1David Anthony Balota2Washington University in St. LouisUniversity of Massachusetts-LowellWashington University in St. LouisRecent research has examined how often mind-wandering occurs about past versus future events. However, mind-wandering may also be atemporal, although previous investigations of this possibility have not yielded consistent results. Indeed, it is unclear what proportion of mind-wandering is atemporal, and also how an atemporal response option would affect the future oriented bias often reported during low-demand tasks used to measure mind-wandering. The present study examined self-reported (Experiment 1) and probe-caught (Experiment 2) mind-wandering using the low-demand Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) in younger (18-30) and older (50-73) adults in an experimental paradigm developed to measure mind-wandering in a sample using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Across self-reported and probe-caught mind-wandering, the atemporal response option was used at least as frequently as past or future mind-wandering options. Although older adults reported far fewer mind-wandering events, they showed a very similar temporal pattern to younger adults. Most importantly, inclusion of the atemporal report option affected performance on the SART and selectively eliminated the prospective bias in self-reported mind-wandering, but not in probe-caught mind-wandering. These results suggest that both young and older participants are often not thinking of past or future events when mind-wandering, but are thinking of events that cannot easily be categorized as either.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00742/fullAgingmind-wanderingprospectionSARTtask-unrelated thoughtretrospection
spellingShingle Jonathan David Jackson
Yana eWeinstein
David Anthony Balota
Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms
Frontiers in Psychology
Aging
mind-wandering
prospection
SART
task-unrelated thought
retrospection
title Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms
title_full Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms
title_fullStr Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms
title_short Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms
title_sort can mind wandering be timeless atemporal focus and aging in mind wandering paradigms
topic Aging
mind-wandering
prospection
SART
task-unrelated thought
retrospection
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00742/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathandavidjackson canmindwanderingbetimelessatemporalfocusandaginginmindwanderingparadigms
AT yanaeweinstein canmindwanderingbetimelessatemporalfocusandaginginmindwanderingparadigms
AT davidanthonybalota canmindwanderingbetimelessatemporalfocusandaginginmindwanderingparadigms