Prostate cancer screening and management: Caution against over-interpreting the results of the latest study, ProtecT

Prostate cancer screening and management: Caution against over-interpreting the results of the latest study, ProtecT

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Isaac Yi Kim
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Korean Urological Association 2023-07-01
Series:	Investigative and Clinical Urology
Online Access:	https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20230178

Similar Items

Latest results from the UK trials evaluating prostate cancer screening and treatment: the CAP and ProtecT studies.
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2010)

Circulating Metabolic Biomarkers of Screen-Detected Prostate Cancer in the ProtecT Study
by: Adams, Charleen D., et al.
Published: (2018)

Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) feasibility study
by: J. Donovan, et al.
Published: (2003-01-01)

The protecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study: Evaluating screening and treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer in the UK
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2006)

Mortality among nen with advanced prostate cancer excluded from the ProtecT Trial
by: Johnston, T, et al.
Published: (2016)

The Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study: what have we learnt?
by: Hamdy, F
Published: (2017)

The ProtecT trial - Evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer (ISRCTN20141297)
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2004)

Associations of adiponectin and leptin with stage and grade of PSA-detected prostate cancer: the ProtecT study.
by: Burton, A, et al.
Published: (2013)

Suitability of PSA-detected localised prostate cancers for focal therapy: experience from the ProtecT study.
by: Catto, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

Suitability of PSA-detected localised prostate cancers for focal therapy: Experience from the ProtecT study
by: Catto, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

Alcohol consumption and PSA-detected prostate cancer risk--a case-control nested in the ProtecT study.
by: Zuccolo, L, et al.
Published: (2013)

Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: Prospective evaluation within ProtecT study
by: Rosario, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study
by: Rosario, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study.
by: Rosario, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Contribution of a single repeat PSA test to prostate cancer risk assessment: experience from the ProtecT study.
by: Rosario, D, et al.
Published: (2008)

The ProtecT trial: Analysis of the patient cohort, baseline risk stratification and disease progression
by: Young, GJ, et al.
Published: (2020)

Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: The ProtecT three-arm RCT
by: Hamdy, FC, et al.
Published: (2020)

Association of obesity with prostate cancer: A case-control study within the population-based PSA testing phase of the ProtecT study
by: Dimitropoulou, P, et al.
Published: (2011)

Association of obesity with prostate cancer: a case-control study within the population-based PSA testing phase of the ProtecT study.
by: Dimitropoulou, P, et al.
Published: (2011)

Caution in studying and interpreting the lupus metabolome
by: Ting Zhang, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Post-diagnosis serum insulin-like growth factors in relation to dietary and lifestyle changes in the Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) trial.
by: Er, V, et al.
Published: (2017)

Establishing nurse-led active surveillance for men with localised prostate cancer: development and formative evaluation of a model of care in the ProtecT trial
by: Wade, J, et al.
Published: (2015)

Re: Predicting High-Grade Cancer at Ten-Core Prostate Biopsy Using Four Kallikrein Markers Measured in Blood in the ProtecT Study
by: Tayyar Alp Özkan
Published: (2015-12-01)

Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study.
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2003)

A prospective cohort and extended comprehensive-cohort design provided insights about the generalizability of a pragmatic trial: the ProtecT prostate cancer trial
by: Donovan, JL, et al.
Published: (2017)

He protec but he also attac – Inflammasomes swinging the sword
by: Aila Akosua Kattner
Published: (2023-10-01)

A CAUTION AGAINST THE ARTIFICIALISTIC FALLACY
by: Robin K. Hill
Published: (2022-05-01)

Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life.
by: Lane, A, et al.
Published: (2016)

Fusobacterium nucleatum: caution with interpreting historical patient sample cohort
by: Kate L. F. Johnstone, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)

Who can best recruit to randomized trials? Randomized trial comparing surgeons and nurses recruiting patients to a trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer (the ProtecT study).
by: Donovan, J, et al.
Published: (2003)

Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the protecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received
by: Neal, D, et al.
Published: (2019)

Associations of sexual dysfunction symptoms with PSA-detected localised and advanced prostate cancer: a case-control study nested within the UK population-based ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) study.
by: Collin, S, et al.
Published: (2009)

Caution in interpreting results from imputation analysis when linkage disequilibrium extends over a large distance: a case study on venous thrombosis.
by: Marine Germain, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

A Word-of-Caution Against Euglycaemic DKA!
by: Rohan Magoon, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

A word of caution against baby formula
by: Mushood Ahmed, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Caution is needed in interpreting the results of comparative studies regarding oncological operations by minimally invasive versus laparotomic access
by: PEDRO RICARDO DE OLIVEIRA FERNANDES, et al.

Caution with competitive gamification in medical education: unexpected results of a randomised cross-over study
by: Jacqueline Kirsch, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

PTGS2-899G>C and prostate cancer risk: a population-based nested case-control study (ProtecT) and a systematic review with meta-analysis.
by: Murad, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

Modelling the lifetime cost-effectiveness of radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy and active monitoring for men with clinically localised prostate cancer from median 10-year outcomes in the ProtecT randomised trial
by: S. Sanghera, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

A comparison of socio-demographic and psychological factors between patients consenting to randomisation and those selecting treatment (the ProtecT study).
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2006)