Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting
A number of standard setting methods are in use with their own strengths and limitations. Angoff is a popular method worldwide but very demanding on resources. This paper explores if the judgement of the Angoff panels of judges can been explained by post-hoc psychometrics. Furthermore the paper exam...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2016-09-01
|
| Series: | MedEdPublish |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/555 |
| _version_ | 1811310990059372544 |
|---|---|
| author | Reza Vahid Roudsari |
| author_facet | Reza Vahid Roudsari |
| author_sort | Reza Vahid Roudsari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | A number of standard setting methods are in use with their own strengths and limitations. Angoff is a popular method worldwide but very demanding on resources. This paper explores if the judgement of the Angoff panels of judges can been explained by post-hoc psychometrics. Furthermore the paper examines if such correlations can be used to standard set exam papers based on their psychometric item difficulty and discrimination index. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T10:08:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9e3723ed722a4b30b867efc371a71df4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2312-7996 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T10:08:49Z |
| publishDate | 2016-09-01 |
| publisher | F1000 Research Ltd |
| record_format | Article |
| series | MedEdPublish |
| spelling | doaj.art-9e3723ed722a4b30b867efc371a71df42022-12-22T02:50:59ZengF1000 Research LtdMedEdPublish2312-79962016-09-0152Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard SettingReza Vahid Roudsari0The University of ManchesterA number of standard setting methods are in use with their own strengths and limitations. Angoff is a popular method worldwide but very demanding on resources. This paper explores if the judgement of the Angoff panels of judges can been explained by post-hoc psychometrics. Furthermore the paper examines if such correlations can be used to standard set exam papers based on their psychometric item difficulty and discrimination index.https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/555standard settingprogress testingpsychometrics |
| spellingShingle | Reza Vahid Roudsari Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting MedEdPublish standard setting progress testing psychometrics |
| title | Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_full | Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_fullStr | Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_full_unstemmed | Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_short | Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_sort | food for thought a new compromised method of standard setting |
| topic | standard setting progress testing psychometrics |
| url | https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/555 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rezavahidroudsari foodforthoughtanewcompromisedmethodofstandardsetting |