Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting
A number of standard setting methods are in use with their own strengths and limitations. Angoff is a popular method worldwide but very demanding on resources. This paper explores if the judgement of the Angoff panels of judges can been explained by post-hoc psychometrics. Furthermore the paper exam...
Main Author: | Reza Vahid Roudsari |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2016-09-01
|
Series: | MedEdPublish |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/555 |
Similar Items
-
Relationships between Bloom’s taxonomy, judges’ estimation of item difficulty and psychometric properties of items from a progress test: a prospective observational study
by: Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Rough Standard Neutrosophic Sets: An Application on Standard Neutrosophic Information Systems
by: Nguyen Xuan Thao, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Setting standards and primary school teachers’ experiences of the process
by: Vanessa Scherman, et al.
Published: (2014-03-01) -
Setting standards and primary school teachers’ experiences of the process
by: Vanessa Scherman, et al.
Published: (2014-03-01) -
The (Secret) Document that Drives Standardized Testing
by: Richard P Phelps
Published: (2012-09-01)