Comparison of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses and sulcus placed intraocular lenses for the treatment of aphakia

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the visual outcomes and safety profile of retropupillary fixated iris claw lenses (RPICLs) and sulcus placed posterior chamber intraocular lenses (SIPCIOL) in the management of aphakia. Materials and Methods: This was a comparative, observational stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanitha Sathyan, Renjini Kurian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2017;volume=29;issue=3;spage=207;epage=212;aulast=Sathyan
_version_ 1811338656282050560
author Sanitha Sathyan
Renjini Kurian
author_facet Sanitha Sathyan
Renjini Kurian
author_sort Sanitha Sathyan
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the visual outcomes and safety profile of retropupillary fixated iris claw lenses (RPICLs) and sulcus placed posterior chamber intraocular lenses (SIPCIOL) in the management of aphakia. Materials and Methods: This was a comparative, observational study, which included 87 eyes of 84 patients who underwent RPICL or SIPCIOL for aphakia. BCVA at 6 weeks, mean prediction error, post-eperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: Group 1 (RPICL group) consisted of 47 eyes of 45 patients and Group 2 (SIPCIOL group) consisted of 40 eyes of 39 patients. Mean age was 67.13 ± 9.33 years in Group 1 and 59.91 ± 16.62 years in Group 2. There was statistically significant difference between preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and post op BCVA at 6 weeks in Group 1 (P = 0.001, paired t-test) and Group 2 (P = 0.001, paired t-test). There was no significant difference in BCVA between the groups at 6 weeks (P = 0.54, unpaired t-test). There was no statistically significant difference in BCVA at 6 weeks between primary surgery and secondary surgery in Group 1 (P = 0.34, unpaired t-test) and Group 2 (P = 0.59, unpaired t-test). The mean prediction error in Group 1 was 0.41 ± 0.58 D and in Group 2 was 0.18 ± 0.20 and was not significant (P = 0.61, unpaired t-test). There was no significant difference between the two groups in mean intraocular pressure at 1 week (P = 0.43, paired t-test) and at 6 weeks (P = 0.83, paired t-test). There was no significant difference between the two groups in operative complications. Conclusion: RPICL was comparable with SIPCIOLs in terms of BCVA at 6 weeks, intraocular lens prediction error, and operative complications.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:15:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9e5b4619718744e38b7af657ea8da9f3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0976-6677
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:15:19Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-9e5b4619718744e38b7af657ea8da9f32022-12-22T02:35:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsKerala Journal of Ophthalmology0976-66772017-01-0129320721210.4103/kjo.kjo_91_17Comparison of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses and sulcus placed intraocular lenses for the treatment of aphakiaSanitha SathyanRenjini KurianPurpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the visual outcomes and safety profile of retropupillary fixated iris claw lenses (RPICLs) and sulcus placed posterior chamber intraocular lenses (SIPCIOL) in the management of aphakia. Materials and Methods: This was a comparative, observational study, which included 87 eyes of 84 patients who underwent RPICL or SIPCIOL for aphakia. BCVA at 6 weeks, mean prediction error, post-eperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: Group 1 (RPICL group) consisted of 47 eyes of 45 patients and Group 2 (SIPCIOL group) consisted of 40 eyes of 39 patients. Mean age was 67.13 ± 9.33 years in Group 1 and 59.91 ± 16.62 years in Group 2. There was statistically significant difference between preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and post op BCVA at 6 weeks in Group 1 (P = 0.001, paired t-test) and Group 2 (P = 0.001, paired t-test). There was no significant difference in BCVA between the groups at 6 weeks (P = 0.54, unpaired t-test). There was no statistically significant difference in BCVA at 6 weeks between primary surgery and secondary surgery in Group 1 (P = 0.34, unpaired t-test) and Group 2 (P = 0.59, unpaired t-test). The mean prediction error in Group 1 was 0.41 ± 0.58 D and in Group 2 was 0.18 ± 0.20 and was not significant (P = 0.61, unpaired t-test). There was no significant difference between the two groups in mean intraocular pressure at 1 week (P = 0.43, paired t-test) and at 6 weeks (P = 0.83, paired t-test). There was no significant difference between the two groups in operative complications. Conclusion: RPICL was comparable with SIPCIOLs in terms of BCVA at 6 weeks, intraocular lens prediction error, and operative complications.http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2017;volume=29;issue=3;spage=207;epage=212;aulast=SathyanAphakia surgical managementretropupillary iris-claw lenssulcus placed intraocular lens
spellingShingle Sanitha Sathyan
Renjini Kurian
Comparison of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses and sulcus placed intraocular lenses for the treatment of aphakia
Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
Aphakia surgical management
retropupillary iris-claw lens
sulcus placed intraocular lens
title Comparison of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses and sulcus placed intraocular lenses for the treatment of aphakia
title_full Comparison of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses and sulcus placed intraocular lenses for the treatment of aphakia
title_fullStr Comparison of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses and sulcus placed intraocular lenses for the treatment of aphakia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses and sulcus placed intraocular lenses for the treatment of aphakia
title_short Comparison of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses and sulcus placed intraocular lenses for the treatment of aphakia
title_sort comparison of retropupillary fixated iris claw lenses and sulcus placed intraocular lenses for the treatment of aphakia
topic Aphakia surgical management
retropupillary iris-claw lens
sulcus placed intraocular lens
url http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2017;volume=29;issue=3;spage=207;epage=212;aulast=Sathyan
work_keys_str_mv AT sanithasathyan comparisonofretropupillaryfixatedirisclawlensesandsulcusplacedintraocularlensesforthetreatmentofaphakia
AT renjinikurian comparisonofretropupillaryfixatedirisclawlensesandsulcusplacedintraocularlensesforthetreatmentofaphakia