A systematic review of programmed learning approach in science education

AbstractNatural science subjects have always been the most challenging for students in schools and universities. While the pandemic brought about a lot of new challenges, it also gave academics the chance to test out evaluation methodologies they had previously thought about but hadn’t used in a rel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timur Sadykov, Gulmira Kokibasova, Yelena Minayeva, Aliyash Ospanova, Maral Kasymova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Cogent Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2189889
_version_ 1797671678755471360
author Timur Sadykov
Gulmira Kokibasova
Yelena Minayeva
Aliyash Ospanova
Maral Kasymova
author_facet Timur Sadykov
Gulmira Kokibasova
Yelena Minayeva
Aliyash Ospanova
Maral Kasymova
author_sort Timur Sadykov
collection DOAJ
description AbstractNatural science subjects have always been the most challenging for students in schools and universities. While the pandemic brought about a lot of new challenges, it also gave academics the chance to test out evaluation methodologies they had previously thought about but hadn’t used in a relatively low-risk setting. The programmed learning approach is a teaching and learning pedagogy that creates better learning experiences. Therefore, this systematic literature review focuses on the impact of programmed instruction on the learning process. The analysis was made based on the PRISMA review methodology. Five databases were searched to find 33 articles about the benefits of programmed instruction in science education published between 1970 and 2022. In terms of research participants, the majority of the studies (14 studies) focused on undergraduate students, college students (5 studies), lecturers/teachers (3 studies), mixed (2 studies), and adults (1 study). Our systematic review found the following benefits of programmed learning: effective and fun teaching approaches, proven favourable impacts on behaviour change, increased scores for college and secondary school students, and raised students’ interest.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:19:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9e5f28a7681844d58a7ace0f6619b89d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-186X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:19:02Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Education
spelling doaj.art-9e5f28a7681844d58a7ace0f6619b89d2023-09-28T10:28:07ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2023-12-0110110.1080/2331186X.2023.2189889A systematic review of programmed learning approach in science educationTimur Sadykov0Gulmira Kokibasova1Yelena Minayeva2Aliyash Ospanova3Maral Kasymova4Ph.D., Assistant professor of the Department of Inorganic and Technical Chemistry, Buketov Karaganda University, Karaganda, KazakhstanСandidate of Chemical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Inorganic and Technical Chemistry, Buketov Karaganda University, Karaganda, KazakhstanСandidate of Chemical Sciences, Associate professor of the Department of Organic Chemistry and Polymers, Buketov Karaganda University, Karaganda, KazakhstanСandidate of Chemical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Inorganic and Technical Chemistry, Buketov Karaganda University, Karaganda, KazakhstanСandidate of Chemical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Physical and Analytical chemistry, Buketov Karaganda University, Karaganda, KazakhstanAbstractNatural science subjects have always been the most challenging for students in schools and universities. While the pandemic brought about a lot of new challenges, it also gave academics the chance to test out evaluation methodologies they had previously thought about but hadn’t used in a relatively low-risk setting. The programmed learning approach is a teaching and learning pedagogy that creates better learning experiences. Therefore, this systematic literature review focuses on the impact of programmed instruction on the learning process. The analysis was made based on the PRISMA review methodology. Five databases were searched to find 33 articles about the benefits of programmed instruction in science education published between 1970 and 2022. In terms of research participants, the majority of the studies (14 studies) focused on undergraduate students, college students (5 studies), lecturers/teachers (3 studies), mixed (2 studies), and adults (1 study). Our systematic review found the following benefits of programmed learning: effective and fun teaching approaches, proven favourable impacts on behaviour change, increased scores for college and secondary school students, and raised students’ interest.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2189889programmed instructionprogrammed learning approachteaching machinesystematic literature revieweducation
spellingShingle Timur Sadykov
Gulmira Kokibasova
Yelena Minayeva
Aliyash Ospanova
Maral Kasymova
A systematic review of programmed learning approach in science education
Cogent Education
programmed instruction
programmed learning approach
teaching machine
systematic literature review
education
title A systematic review of programmed learning approach in science education
title_full A systematic review of programmed learning approach in science education
title_fullStr A systematic review of programmed learning approach in science education
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of programmed learning approach in science education
title_short A systematic review of programmed learning approach in science education
title_sort systematic review of programmed learning approach in science education
topic programmed instruction
programmed learning approach
teaching machine
systematic literature review
education
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2189889
work_keys_str_mv AT timursadykov asystematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation
AT gulmirakokibasova asystematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation
AT yelenaminayeva asystematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation
AT aliyashospanova asystematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation
AT maralkasymova asystematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation
AT timursadykov systematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation
AT gulmirakokibasova systematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation
AT yelenaminayeva systematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation
AT aliyashospanova systematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation
AT maralkasymova systematicreviewofprogrammedlearningapproachinscienceeducation