Constitutional Principles in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal Theory and Judicial Deciding

The basic thesis of this essay is that constitutional principles and legal rules can have a meaning in judicial decision, when legal order imparts significance to judicial practice. Research and analysis of implementation of constitutional principles in the practice of courts in Bosnia and Herzegov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Davor Trlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Latvia Press 2018-08-01
Series:Law: Journal of the University of Latvia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.lu.lv/jull/article/view/154
_version_ 1829096519343538176
author Davor Trlin
author_facet Davor Trlin
author_sort Davor Trlin
collection DOAJ
description The basic thesis of this essay is that constitutional principles and legal rules can have a meaning in judicial decision, when legal order imparts significance to judicial practice. Research and analysis of implementation of constitutional principles in the practice of courts in Bosnia and Herzegovina, especially in the practice of three constitutional courts, so far has not proved sufficient. To what amount the constitutional principles are used in direct implementation of constitutional principles, is just one of the questions that come up regarding this topic. It is also interesting and important to explore in what way the practice of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in deciding on the abstract constitutionality of laws and in appellate jurisdiction shows the application of legal principles in the decisions of the supreme courts of entities and Appellate court of Brčko district of Bosnia and Herzegovina. That is because some general principles are a part of the human rights and fundamental freedoms mentioned in the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It should also be added that the practice of the European Court of Human Rights through its decisions in applying the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms affects the practice of the supreme courts of entities and the application of the legal principles that are part of the Convention.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T08:58:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9e7319d67c8d4996b5e1d0c89cd7bbe4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1691-7677
2592-9364
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T08:58:35Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher University of Latvia Press
record_format Article
series Law: Journal of the University of Latvia
spelling doaj.art-9e7319d67c8d4996b5e1d0c89cd7bbe42022-12-22T04:33:05ZengUniversity of Latvia PressLaw: Journal of the University of Latvia1691-76772592-93642018-08-011110.22364/jull.11.07Constitutional Principles in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal Theory and Judicial DecidingDavor Trlin The basic thesis of this essay is that constitutional principles and legal rules can have a meaning in judicial decision, when legal order imparts significance to judicial practice. Research and analysis of implementation of constitutional principles in the practice of courts in Bosnia and Herzegovina, especially in the practice of three constitutional courts, so far has not proved sufficient. To what amount the constitutional principles are used in direct implementation of constitutional principles, is just one of the questions that come up regarding this topic. It is also interesting and important to explore in what way the practice of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in deciding on the abstract constitutionality of laws and in appellate jurisdiction shows the application of legal principles in the decisions of the supreme courts of entities and Appellate court of Brčko district of Bosnia and Herzegovina. That is because some general principles are a part of the human rights and fundamental freedoms mentioned in the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It should also be added that the practice of the European Court of Human Rights through its decisions in applying the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms affects the practice of the supreme courts of entities and the application of the legal principles that are part of the Convention. https://journal.lu.lv/jull/article/view/154constitutional principleconstitutional courtlegal doctrineadjudicationjudicial interpretation
spellingShingle Davor Trlin
Constitutional Principles in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal Theory and Judicial Deciding
Law: Journal of the University of Latvia
constitutional principle
constitutional court
legal doctrine
adjudication
judicial interpretation
title Constitutional Principles in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal Theory and Judicial Deciding
title_full Constitutional Principles in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal Theory and Judicial Deciding
title_fullStr Constitutional Principles in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal Theory and Judicial Deciding
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional Principles in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal Theory and Judicial Deciding
title_short Constitutional Principles in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal Theory and Judicial Deciding
title_sort constitutional principles in bosnia and herzegovina legal theory and judicial deciding
topic constitutional principle
constitutional court
legal doctrine
adjudication
judicial interpretation
url https://journal.lu.lv/jull/article/view/154
work_keys_str_mv AT davortrlin constitutionalprinciplesinbosniaandherzegovinalegaltheoryandjudicialdeciding