Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?

Policies that mandate public data archiving (PDA) successfully increase accessibility to data underlying scientific publications. However, is the data quality sufficient to allow reuse and reanalysis? We surveyed 100 datasets associated with nonmolecular studies in journals that commonly publish eco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dominique G Roche, Loeske E B Kruuk, Robert Lanfear, Sandra A Binning
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295
_version_ 1818577585802575872
author Dominique G Roche
Loeske E B Kruuk
Robert Lanfear
Sandra A Binning
author_facet Dominique G Roche
Loeske E B Kruuk
Robert Lanfear
Sandra A Binning
author_sort Dominique G Roche
collection DOAJ
description Policies that mandate public data archiving (PDA) successfully increase accessibility to data underlying scientific publications. However, is the data quality sufficient to allow reuse and reanalysis? We surveyed 100 datasets associated with nonmolecular studies in journals that commonly publish ecological and evolutionary research and have a strong PDA policy. Out of these datasets, 56% were incomplete, and 64% were archived in a way that partially or entirely prevented reuse. We suggest that cultural shifts facilitating clearer benefits to authors are necessary to achieve high-quality PDA and highlight key guidelines to help authors increase their data's reuse potential and compliance with journal data policies.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T06:32:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9e760303152c454989b30dcc4e17f570
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1544-9173
1545-7885
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T06:32:15Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Biology
spelling doaj.art-9e760303152c454989b30dcc4e17f5702022-12-21T22:40:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852015-01-011311e100229510.1371/journal.pbio.1002295Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?Dominique G RocheLoeske E B KruukRobert LanfearSandra A BinningPolicies that mandate public data archiving (PDA) successfully increase accessibility to data underlying scientific publications. However, is the data quality sufficient to allow reuse and reanalysis? We surveyed 100 datasets associated with nonmolecular studies in journals that commonly publish ecological and evolutionary research and have a strong PDA policy. Out of these datasets, 56% were incomplete, and 64% were archived in a way that partially or entirely prevented reuse. We suggest that cultural shifts facilitating clearer benefits to authors are necessary to achieve high-quality PDA and highlight key guidelines to help authors increase their data's reuse potential and compliance with journal data policies.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295
spellingShingle Dominique G Roche
Loeske E B Kruuk
Robert Lanfear
Sandra A Binning
Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?
PLoS Biology
title Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?
title_full Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?
title_fullStr Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?
title_full_unstemmed Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?
title_short Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?
title_sort public data archiving in ecology and evolution how well are we doing
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295
work_keys_str_mv AT dominiquegroche publicdataarchivinginecologyandevolutionhowwellarewedoing
AT loeskeebkruuk publicdataarchivinginecologyandevolutionhowwellarewedoing
AT robertlanfear publicdataarchivinginecologyandevolutionhowwellarewedoing
AT sandraabinning publicdataarchivinginecologyandevolutionhowwellarewedoing