Unintentionally Trapped by Debt Review: Procedural Inadequacies in the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 Relating to Withdrawal from the Debt Review Process
The debt review procedure in terms of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 is functioning relatively well and benefits both consumers and credit providers. This is despite its somewhat scarce procedural prescriptions, which result in difficulties from time to time. In this respect, a recent procedural...
Main Authors: | Hermie Coetzee, Corlia Van Heerden |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
North-West University
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/per/article/view/6966 |
Similar Items
-
Perspectives on the Termination of Debt Review in Terms of Section 86(10) of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005
by: C van Heerden, et al.
Published: (2011-05-01) -
Brexit: EU-UK Economic relations in the aftermath of the Eurozone debt crisis
by: Tari Zahia, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Opioid withdrawal presenting as delirium and role of buprenorphine: A case series
by: Sourav Das, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Sex difference in alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a scoping review of clinical studies
by: Hayrunnisa Unlu, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Neural mechanisms underlying morphine withdrawal in addicted patients: a review
by: Nima Babhadiashar, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)