Comparison of the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers

Background: Today, quality of services is one of the main factors for the survival and growth of any type of organization, including educational organizations. Service providers and service recipients both play key roles in determining the quality of services. Aims: The purpose of this study was to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amirmehdi Jafari Haghighatpour, Jahanyar Bamdad Soufi, Mohammadtaghi Taghavi Fard, Ali Khorsandi Taskoh
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Dr. Mahmoud Mansour publication 2022-12-01
Series:مجله علوم روانشناختی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-1611-en.html
_version_ 1827990247526367232
author Amirmehdi Jafari Haghighatpour
Jahanyar Bamdad Soufi
Mohammadtaghi Taghavi Fard
Ali Khorsandi Taskoh
author_facet Amirmehdi Jafari Haghighatpour
Jahanyar Bamdad Soufi
Mohammadtaghi Taghavi Fard
Ali Khorsandi Taskoh
author_sort Amirmehdi Jafari Haghighatpour
collection DOAJ
description Background: Today, quality of services is one of the main factors for the survival and growth of any type of organization, including educational organizations. Service providers and service recipients both play key roles in determining the quality of services. Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers based on the HEdPERF model. Methods: The present research is from the perspective of exploratory-applied orientation and from the perspective of descriptive-survey goal. The statistical population of smart schools in region 2 of Tehran, which has 4 smart schools, has a total of 240 students and 83 teachers and teaching staff. The number of samples obtained for service recipients (students) is 148 and 64 people as a statistical sample of service providers (teachers and teaching staff). A questionnaire was used to collect research data. To compare the quality of smart educational services between these two groups, t-test with two independent samples was used. Results: For all 6 components of quality of education services including educational aspect, educational performance, program, non-educational aspect, access and reputation between service recipients and service providers, there is a significant difference of 99% confidence level. In other words, in all six mentioned aspects, the service providers evaluated the current situation better than the service receivers. Conclusion: From the perspective of service recipients, the average quality of services provided is lower than that of service providers. That is, there is a gap between the views of service providers and recipients Such a result was somewhat predictable, because most of the service providers evaluate the quality of their services more favorably than the service receivers, and the service receivers usually have more critical opinions about the various dimensions of the services provided.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T00:32:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9e851e5b424f4657ae0a971c4d72406e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-7462
2676-6639
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-10T00:32:17Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Dr. Mahmoud Mansour publication
record_format Article
series مجله علوم روانشناختی
spelling doaj.art-9e851e5b424f4657ae0a971c4d72406e2023-03-14T21:18:19ZfasDr. Mahmoud Mansour publicationمجله علوم روانشناختی1735-74622676-66392022-12-012111717131728Comparison of the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providersAmirmehdi Jafari Haghighatpour0Jahanyar Bamdad Soufi1Mohammadtaghi Taghavi Fard2Ali Khorsandi Taskoh3 Ph.D Candidate in Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran Background: Today, quality of services is one of the main factors for the survival and growth of any type of organization, including educational organizations. Service providers and service recipients both play key roles in determining the quality of services. Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers based on the HEdPERF model. Methods: The present research is from the perspective of exploratory-applied orientation and from the perspective of descriptive-survey goal. The statistical population of smart schools in region 2 of Tehran, which has 4 smart schools, has a total of 240 students and 83 teachers and teaching staff. The number of samples obtained for service recipients (students) is 148 and 64 people as a statistical sample of service providers (teachers and teaching staff). A questionnaire was used to collect research data. To compare the quality of smart educational services between these two groups, t-test with two independent samples was used. Results: For all 6 components of quality of education services including educational aspect, educational performance, program, non-educational aspect, access and reputation between service recipients and service providers, there is a significant difference of 99% confidence level. In other words, in all six mentioned aspects, the service providers evaluated the current situation better than the service receivers. Conclusion: From the perspective of service recipients, the average quality of services provided is lower than that of service providers. That is, there is a gap between the views of service providers and recipients Such a result was somewhat predictable, because most of the service providers evaluate the quality of their services more favorably than the service receivers, and the service receivers usually have more critical opinions about the various dimensions of the services provided.http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-1611-en.htmleducational servicesquality evaluationservice qualitysmart schools
spellingShingle Amirmehdi Jafari Haghighatpour
Jahanyar Bamdad Soufi
Mohammadtaghi Taghavi Fard
Ali Khorsandi Taskoh
Comparison of the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers
مجله علوم روانشناختی
educational services
quality evaluation
service quality
smart schools
title Comparison of the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers
title_full Comparison of the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers
title_fullStr Comparison of the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers
title_short Comparison of the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers
title_sort comparison of the quality model of smart educational services from the viewpoint of recipients and service providers
topic educational services
quality evaluation
service quality
smart schools
url http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-1611-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT amirmehdijafarihaghighatpour comparisonofthequalitymodelofsmarteducationalservicesfromtheviewpointofrecipientsandserviceproviders
AT jahanyarbamdadsoufi comparisonofthequalitymodelofsmarteducationalservicesfromtheviewpointofrecipientsandserviceproviders
AT mohammadtaghitaghavifard comparisonofthequalitymodelofsmarteducationalservicesfromtheviewpointofrecipientsandserviceproviders
AT alikhorsanditaskoh comparisonofthequalitymodelofsmarteducationalservicesfromtheviewpointofrecipientsandserviceproviders