Ethical health resources allocation: Why the distinction between ‘rationing’ and ‘rationalization’ matters

Allocation of health resources has an irreducible ethical dimension, thus cannot be decided only technically, but must be ethically weighed, what paradigmatic experiences of macro (Oregon Basic Health Services Act, 1989) and micro allocation (God’s Committee, 1962) have shown. Justice is required in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Universidad de Barcelona 2020-07-01
Series:Revista de Bioética y Derecho
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/RBD/article/view/32044
_version_ 1826994660635049985
author Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
author_facet Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
author_sort Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
collection DOAJ
description Allocation of health resources has an irreducible ethical dimension, thus cannot be decided only technically, but must be ethically weighed, what paradigmatic experiences of macro (Oregon Basic Health Services Act, 1989) and micro allocation (God’s Committee, 1962) have shown. Justice is required in the enunciation of prioritization criteria, and transparency in its application. In situations of aggravated resource scarcity, it is common to take ‘allocate’ and ‘rationing’ as synonyms or claim that ‘allocate’ is always ‘rationing’. Rejecting these positions, there is a distinction between 'allocating' (resource management) from 'rationing' (allocation of limited resources to a limited number of persons) and 'rationalizing' (optimization of available resources). These distinctions are ethically pertinent, showing how only 'rationalization' respects justice, transparency and human dignity.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:43:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ea8ded932994ef9bfff2c9fd90bc905
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2545-6385
1886-5887
language Catalan
last_indexed 2025-02-18T09:21:49Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Universidad de Barcelona
record_format Article
series Revista de Bioética y Derecho
spelling doaj.art-9ea8ded932994ef9bfff2c9fd90bc9052024-11-02T21:35:59ZcatUniversidad de BarcelonaRevista de Bioética y Derecho2545-63851886-58872020-07-01637910.1344/rbd2020.50.3204426445Ethical health resources allocation: Why the distinction between ‘rationing’ and ‘rationalization’ mattersMaria do Céu Patrão NevesAllocation of health resources has an irreducible ethical dimension, thus cannot be decided only technically, but must be ethically weighed, what paradigmatic experiences of macro (Oregon Basic Health Services Act, 1989) and micro allocation (God’s Committee, 1962) have shown. Justice is required in the enunciation of prioritization criteria, and transparency in its application. In situations of aggravated resource scarcity, it is common to take ‘allocate’ and ‘rationing’ as synonyms or claim that ‘allocate’ is always ‘rationing’. Rejecting these positions, there is a distinction between 'allocating' (resource management) from 'rationing' (allocation of limited resources to a limited number of persons) and 'rationalizing' (optimization of available resources). These distinctions are ethically pertinent, showing how only 'rationalization' respects justice, transparency and human dignity.https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/RBD/article/view/32044allocationrationingrationalizationjusticetransparencyhuman dignity
spellingShingle Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
Ethical health resources allocation: Why the distinction between ‘rationing’ and ‘rationalization’ matters
Revista de Bioética y Derecho
allocation
rationing
rationalization
justice
transparency
human dignity
title Ethical health resources allocation: Why the distinction between ‘rationing’ and ‘rationalization’ matters
title_full Ethical health resources allocation: Why the distinction between ‘rationing’ and ‘rationalization’ matters
title_fullStr Ethical health resources allocation: Why the distinction between ‘rationing’ and ‘rationalization’ matters
title_full_unstemmed Ethical health resources allocation: Why the distinction between ‘rationing’ and ‘rationalization’ matters
title_short Ethical health resources allocation: Why the distinction between ‘rationing’ and ‘rationalization’ matters
title_sort ethical health resources allocation why the distinction between rationing and rationalization matters
topic allocation
rationing
rationalization
justice
transparency
human dignity
url https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/RBD/article/view/32044
work_keys_str_mv AT mariadoceupatraoneves ethicalhealthresourcesallocationwhythedistinctionbetweenrationingandrationalizationmatters