The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial

Abstract Pregnant individuals rarely achieve moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity recommendations. Purpose The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial aimed to demonstrate feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bethany Barone Gibbs, Andrea C. Kozai, Shannon N. McAdoo, Kelliann D. Davis, Meghan B. Savidge, Joshua L. Paley, Alisse Hauspurg, Janet M. Catov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-04-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06474-3
_version_ 1797209012407631872
author Bethany Barone Gibbs
Andrea C. Kozai
Shannon N. McAdoo
Kelliann D. Davis
Meghan B. Savidge
Joshua L. Paley
Alisse Hauspurg
Janet M. Catov
author_facet Bethany Barone Gibbs
Andrea C. Kozai
Shannon N. McAdoo
Kelliann D. Davis
Meghan B. Savidge
Joshua L. Paley
Alisse Hauspurg
Janet M. Catov
author_sort Bethany Barone Gibbs
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Pregnant individuals rarely achieve moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity recommendations. Purpose The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial aimed to demonstrate feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a lower intensity intervention targeting reduced sedentary behavior and increased standing and steps. Methods First trimester pregnant individuals at risk for high sedentary behavior and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) were randomized 2:1 to a multi-component sedentary behavior reduction intervention or no-contact control. Intervention components included biweekly remote health coaching, wearable activity monitor, height-adjustable workstation, and a private Facebook group. Evidence-based behavioral targets included sedentary time < 9 h/day, increasing standing by 2–3 h/day, and ≥ 7500 steps/day. Participants completed all-remote assessments (baseline, second trimester, third trimester) of sedentary behavior and activity (thigh-worn activPAL) along with exploratory pregnancy health outcomes abstracted from medical records. Intervention effects vs. control were evaluated using generalized mixed models and an intention-to-treat approach. Intervention participants also provided feedback on perceived benefits and acceptability. Results Participants (34 intervention; 17 control) had mean age 32 years, were 83% White, with mean pre-pregnancy BMI 28 kg/m2. Retention was high (90% and 83% at second and third trimester follow-up visits). Intervention participants decreased sedentary time (-0.84 h/day, p = 0.019) and increased standing (+0.77 h/day, p = 0.003), but did not increase steps/day (+710, p = 0.257) compared to controls. Intervention participants reported many perceived benefits and identified the wearable, height-adjustable workstation, and behavioral lessons as most useful. Conclusion For pregnant individuals at risk for high sedentary behavior and APOs, a sedentary behavior reduction intervention is feasible, acceptable, and may offer a viable alternative to more intense physical activity recommendations during pregnancy. Further testing in a fully powered clinical trial is warranted. Trial registration NCT05093842 on clinicaltrials.gov
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:47:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ea9a0a0b1ed4040966c15f0b2a4b92b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:47:56Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-9ea9a0a0b1ed4040966c15f0b2a4b92b2024-04-14T11:32:04ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932024-04-0124111510.1186/s12884-024-06474-3The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trialBethany Barone Gibbs0Andrea C. Kozai1Shannon N. McAdoo2Kelliann D. Davis3Meghan B. Savidge4Joshua L. Paley5Alisse Hauspurg6Janet M. Catov7Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West Virginia University School of Public HealthDepartment of Epidemiology, University of PittsburghDepartment of Health and Human Development, University of PittsburghDepartment of Health and Human Development, University of PittsburghDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South CarolinaDepartment of Health and Human Development, University of PittsburghDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, and Magee Women’s Research InstituteDepartment of Epidemiology, University of PittsburghAbstract Pregnant individuals rarely achieve moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity recommendations. Purpose The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial aimed to demonstrate feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a lower intensity intervention targeting reduced sedentary behavior and increased standing and steps. Methods First trimester pregnant individuals at risk for high sedentary behavior and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) were randomized 2:1 to a multi-component sedentary behavior reduction intervention or no-contact control. Intervention components included biweekly remote health coaching, wearable activity monitor, height-adjustable workstation, and a private Facebook group. Evidence-based behavioral targets included sedentary time < 9 h/day, increasing standing by 2–3 h/day, and ≥ 7500 steps/day. Participants completed all-remote assessments (baseline, second trimester, third trimester) of sedentary behavior and activity (thigh-worn activPAL) along with exploratory pregnancy health outcomes abstracted from medical records. Intervention effects vs. control were evaluated using generalized mixed models and an intention-to-treat approach. Intervention participants also provided feedback on perceived benefits and acceptability. Results Participants (34 intervention; 17 control) had mean age 32 years, were 83% White, with mean pre-pregnancy BMI 28 kg/m2. Retention was high (90% and 83% at second and third trimester follow-up visits). Intervention participants decreased sedentary time (-0.84 h/day, p = 0.019) and increased standing (+0.77 h/day, p = 0.003), but did not increase steps/day (+710, p = 0.257) compared to controls. Intervention participants reported many perceived benefits and identified the wearable, height-adjustable workstation, and behavioral lessons as most useful. Conclusion For pregnant individuals at risk for high sedentary behavior and APOs, a sedentary behavior reduction intervention is feasible, acceptable, and may offer a viable alternative to more intense physical activity recommendations during pregnancy. Further testing in a fully powered clinical trial is warranted. Trial registration NCT05093842 on clinicaltrials.govhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06474-3Thigh-worn accelerometerAcceptabilityHealth coachingMulti-level intervention
spellingShingle Bethany Barone Gibbs
Andrea C. Kozai
Shannon N. McAdoo
Kelliann D. Davis
Meghan B. Savidge
Joshua L. Paley
Alisse Hauspurg
Janet M. Catov
The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Thigh-worn accelerometer
Acceptability
Health coaching
Multi-level intervention
title The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial
title_full The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial
title_fullStr The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial
title_short The sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention (SPRING) pilot and feasibility randomized trial
title_sort sedentary behavior reduction in pregnancy intervention spring pilot and feasibility randomized trial
topic Thigh-worn accelerometer
Acceptability
Health coaching
Multi-level intervention
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06474-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bethanybaronegibbs thesedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT andreackozai thesedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT shannonnmcadoo thesedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT kelliannddavis thesedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT meghanbsavidge thesedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT joshualpaley thesedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT alissehauspurg thesedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT janetmcatov thesedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT bethanybaronegibbs sedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT andreackozai sedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT shannonnmcadoo sedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT kelliannddavis sedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT meghanbsavidge sedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT joshualpaley sedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT alissehauspurg sedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial
AT janetmcatov sedentarybehaviorreductioninpregnancyinterventionspringpilotandfeasibilityrandomizedtrial