Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (Ursus arctos) density in the Romanian Carpathians

Abstract Accurate population size estimates are important information for sustainable wildlife management. The Romanian Carpathians harbor the largest brown bear (Ursus arctos) population in Europe, yet current management relies on estimates of density that lack statistical oversight and ignore unce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viorel D. Popescu, Ruben Iosif, Mihai I. Pop, Silviu Chiriac, George Bouroș, Brett J. Furnas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-09-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3177
_version_ 1818858755749576704
author Viorel D. Popescu
Ruben Iosif
Mihai I. Pop
Silviu Chiriac
George Bouroș
Brett J. Furnas
author_facet Viorel D. Popescu
Ruben Iosif
Mihai I. Pop
Silviu Chiriac
George Bouroș
Brett J. Furnas
author_sort Viorel D. Popescu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Accurate population size estimates are important information for sustainable wildlife management. The Romanian Carpathians harbor the largest brown bear (Ursus arctos) population in Europe, yet current management relies on estimates of density that lack statistical oversight and ignore uncertainty deriving from track surveys. In this study, we investigate an alternative approach to estimate brown bear density using sign surveys along transects within a novel integration of occupancy models and home range methods. We performed repeated surveys along 2‐km segments of forest roads during three distinct seasons: spring 2011, fall‐winter 2011, and spring 2012, within three game management units and a Natura 2000 site. We estimated bears abundances along transects using the number of unique tracks observed per survey occasion via N‐mixture hierarchical models, which account for imperfect detection. To obtain brown bear densities, we combined these abundances with the effective sampling area of the transects, that is, estimated as a function of the median (± bootstrapped SE) of the core home range (5.58 ± 1.08 km2) based on telemetry data from 17 bears tracked for 1‐month periods overlapping our surveys windows. Our analyses yielded average brown bear densities (and 95% confidence intervals) for the three seasons of: 11.5 (7.8–15.3), 11.3 (7.4–15.2), and 12.4 (8.6–16.3) individuals/100 km2. Across game management units, mean densities ranged between 7.5 and 14.8 individuals/100 km2. Our method incorporates multiple sources of uncertainty (e.g., effective sampling area, imperfect detection) to estimate brown bear density, but the inference fundamentally relies on unmarked individuals only. While useful as a temporary approach to monitor brown bears, we urge implementing DNA capture–recapture methods regionally to inform brown bear management and recommend increasing resources for GPS collars to improve estimates of effective sampling area.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T09:01:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9eaeb515921247e6afdb44708e0dc56f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T09:01:20Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-9eaeb515921247e6afdb44708e0dc56f2022-12-21T20:28:28ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582017-09-017187134714410.1002/ece3.3177Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (Ursus arctos) density in the Romanian CarpathiansViorel D. Popescu0Ruben Iosif1Mihai I. Pop2Silviu Chiriac3George Bouroș4Brett J. Furnas5Department of Biological Sciences Ohio University Athens OH USACentre for Environmental Research (CCMESI) University of Bucharest Bucharest RomaniaCentre for Environmental Research (CCMESI) University of Bucharest Bucharest RomaniaVrancea Environmental Protection Agency Focsani RomaniaAsociatia pentru Conservarea Diversitatii Biologice (ACDB) Focsani RomaniaCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Investigations Laboratory Rancho Cordova CA USAAbstract Accurate population size estimates are important information for sustainable wildlife management. The Romanian Carpathians harbor the largest brown bear (Ursus arctos) population in Europe, yet current management relies on estimates of density that lack statistical oversight and ignore uncertainty deriving from track surveys. In this study, we investigate an alternative approach to estimate brown bear density using sign surveys along transects within a novel integration of occupancy models and home range methods. We performed repeated surveys along 2‐km segments of forest roads during three distinct seasons: spring 2011, fall‐winter 2011, and spring 2012, within three game management units and a Natura 2000 site. We estimated bears abundances along transects using the number of unique tracks observed per survey occasion via N‐mixture hierarchical models, which account for imperfect detection. To obtain brown bear densities, we combined these abundances with the effective sampling area of the transects, that is, estimated as a function of the median (± bootstrapped SE) of the core home range (5.58 ± 1.08 km2) based on telemetry data from 17 bears tracked for 1‐month periods overlapping our surveys windows. Our analyses yielded average brown bear densities (and 95% confidence intervals) for the three seasons of: 11.5 (7.8–15.3), 11.3 (7.4–15.2), and 12.4 (8.6–16.3) individuals/100 km2. Across game management units, mean densities ranged between 7.5 and 14.8 individuals/100 km2. Our method incorporates multiple sources of uncertainty (e.g., effective sampling area, imperfect detection) to estimate brown bear density, but the inference fundamentally relies on unmarked individuals only. While useful as a temporary approach to monitor brown bears, we urge implementing DNA capture–recapture methods regionally to inform brown bear management and recommend increasing resources for GPS collars to improve estimates of effective sampling area.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3177CarpathiansN‐mixture modelpopulation densityRomaniatrack surveyUrsus arctos
spellingShingle Viorel D. Popescu
Ruben Iosif
Mihai I. Pop
Silviu Chiriac
George Bouroș
Brett J. Furnas
Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (Ursus arctos) density in the Romanian Carpathians
Ecology and Evolution
Carpathians
N‐mixture model
population density
Romania
track survey
Ursus arctos
title Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (Ursus arctos) density in the Romanian Carpathians
title_full Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (Ursus arctos) density in the Romanian Carpathians
title_fullStr Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (Ursus arctos) density in the Romanian Carpathians
title_full_unstemmed Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (Ursus arctos) density in the Romanian Carpathians
title_short Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (Ursus arctos) density in the Romanian Carpathians
title_sort integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear ursus arctos density in the romanian carpathians
topic Carpathians
N‐mixture model
population density
Romania
track survey
Ursus arctos
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3177
work_keys_str_mv AT vioreldpopescu integratingsignsurveysandtelemetrydataforestimatingbrownbearursusarctosdensityintheromaniancarpathians
AT rubeniosif integratingsignsurveysandtelemetrydataforestimatingbrownbearursusarctosdensityintheromaniancarpathians
AT mihaiipop integratingsignsurveysandtelemetrydataforestimatingbrownbearursusarctosdensityintheromaniancarpathians
AT silviuchiriac integratingsignsurveysandtelemetrydataforestimatingbrownbearursusarctosdensityintheromaniancarpathians
AT georgebouros integratingsignsurveysandtelemetrydataforestimatingbrownbearursusarctosdensityintheromaniancarpathians
AT brettjfurnas integratingsignsurveysandtelemetrydataforestimatingbrownbearursusarctosdensityintheromaniancarpathians