Sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines: effects of design turbulence and the Wöhler exponent
<p>Fatigue assessment of wind turbines involves three main sources of uncertainty: material resistance, load, and the damage accumulation model. Many studies focus on increasing the accuracy of fatigue load assessment to improve the fatigue reliability. Probabilistic modeling of the wind'...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Wind Energy Science |
| Online Access: | https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/9/799/2024/wes-9-799-2024.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797221297951866880 |
|---|---|
| author | S. Mozafari P. Veers J. Rinker K. Dykes |
| author_facet | S. Mozafari P. Veers J. Rinker K. Dykes |
| author_sort | S. Mozafari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Fatigue assessment of wind turbines involves three main sources of uncertainty: material resistance, load, and the damage accumulation model. Many studies focus on increasing the accuracy of fatigue load assessment to improve the fatigue reliability. Probabilistic modeling of the wind's turbulence standard deviation is an example of an approach used for this purpose.</p>
<p>Editions 3 and 4 of the IEC standard for the design of wind energy generation systems (IEC 61400-1) suggest different probability distributions as alternatives for the representative turbulence in the normal turbulence model (NTM) of edition 1. There are debates on whether the suggested distributions provide conservative reliability levels, as the established design safety factors are calibrated based on the representative turbulence approach. The current study addresses the debate by comparing annual reliability based on different scenarios of NTM using a probabilistic approach. More importantly, it elaborates on the relative importance of load assessment accuracy in defining the fatigue reliability.</p>
<p>Using the DTU 10 MW reference wind turbine and the first-order reliability method (FORM), we study the changes in the annual reliability level and its sensitivity to the three main random inputs. We perform the study considering the blade root flapwise and the tower base fore–aft moments, assuming different fatigue exponents in each load channel.</p>
<p>The results show that integration over distributions of turbulence in each mean wind speed results in less conservative annual reliability levels than representative turbulence. The difference in the reliability levels varies according to turbulence distribution and the fatigue exponent. In the case of the tower base, the difference in the annual reliability index after 20 years can be up to 50 %. However, the model and material uncertainty have much higher effects on the reliability levels compared to load uncertainty. Knowledge about such differences in the reliability levels due to the choice of turbulence distribution is especially important, as it impacts the extent of lifetime extension through reliability reassessments.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:03:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9ed3077dfa4e4bbdbdcecdc4481c6381 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7443 2366-7451 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:03:12Z |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Wind Energy Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-9ed3077dfa4e4bbdbdcecdc4481c63812024-04-05T09:56:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsWind Energy Science2366-74432366-74512024-04-01979982010.5194/wes-9-799-2024Sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines: effects of design turbulence and the Wöhler exponentS. Mozafari0P. Veers1J. Rinker2K. Dykes3Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, DenmarkNational Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO, USADepartment of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, DenmarkDepartment of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark<p>Fatigue assessment of wind turbines involves three main sources of uncertainty: material resistance, load, and the damage accumulation model. Many studies focus on increasing the accuracy of fatigue load assessment to improve the fatigue reliability. Probabilistic modeling of the wind's turbulence standard deviation is an example of an approach used for this purpose.</p> <p>Editions 3 and 4 of the IEC standard for the design of wind energy generation systems (IEC 61400-1) suggest different probability distributions as alternatives for the representative turbulence in the normal turbulence model (NTM) of edition 1. There are debates on whether the suggested distributions provide conservative reliability levels, as the established design safety factors are calibrated based on the representative turbulence approach. The current study addresses the debate by comparing annual reliability based on different scenarios of NTM using a probabilistic approach. More importantly, it elaborates on the relative importance of load assessment accuracy in defining the fatigue reliability.</p> <p>Using the DTU 10 MW reference wind turbine and the first-order reliability method (FORM), we study the changes in the annual reliability level and its sensitivity to the three main random inputs. We perform the study considering the blade root flapwise and the tower base fore–aft moments, assuming different fatigue exponents in each load channel.</p> <p>The results show that integration over distributions of turbulence in each mean wind speed results in less conservative annual reliability levels than representative turbulence. The difference in the reliability levels varies according to turbulence distribution and the fatigue exponent. In the case of the tower base, the difference in the annual reliability index after 20 years can be up to 50 %. However, the model and material uncertainty have much higher effects on the reliability levels compared to load uncertainty. Knowledge about such differences in the reliability levels due to the choice of turbulence distribution is especially important, as it impacts the extent of lifetime extension through reliability reassessments.</p>https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/9/799/2024/wes-9-799-2024.pdf |
| spellingShingle | S. Mozafari P. Veers J. Rinker K. Dykes Sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines: effects of design turbulence and the Wöhler exponent Wind Energy Science |
| title | Sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines: effects of design turbulence and the Wöhler exponent |
| title_full | Sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines: effects of design turbulence and the Wöhler exponent |
| title_fullStr | Sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines: effects of design turbulence and the Wöhler exponent |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines: effects of design turbulence and the Wöhler exponent |
| title_short | Sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines: effects of design turbulence and the Wöhler exponent |
| title_sort | sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines effects of design turbulence and the wohler exponent |
| url | https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/9/799/2024/wes-9-799-2024.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT smozafari sensitivityoffatiguereliabilityinwindturbineseffectsofdesignturbulenceandthewohlerexponent AT pveers sensitivityoffatiguereliabilityinwindturbineseffectsofdesignturbulenceandthewohlerexponent AT jrinker sensitivityoffatiguereliabilityinwindturbineseffectsofdesignturbulenceandthewohlerexponent AT kdykes sensitivityoffatiguereliabilityinwindturbineseffectsofdesignturbulenceandthewohlerexponent |