A comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau.
As CO2 concentrations continue to rise and drive global climate change, much effort has been put into estimating soil carbon (C) stocks and dynamics over time. However, the inconsistent methods employed by researchers hamper the comparability of such works, creating a pressing need to standardize th...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4422439?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1819213215907708928 |
---|---|
author | Litong Chen Dan F B Flynn Xin Jing Peter Kühn Thomas Scholten Jin-Sheng He |
author_facet | Litong Chen Dan F B Flynn Xin Jing Peter Kühn Thomas Scholten Jin-Sheng He |
author_sort | Litong Chen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | As CO2 concentrations continue to rise and drive global climate change, much effort has been put into estimating soil carbon (C) stocks and dynamics over time. However, the inconsistent methods employed by researchers hamper the comparability of such works, creating a pressing need to standardize the methods for soil organic C (SOC) quantification by the various methods. Here, we collected 712 soil samples from 36 sites of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau covering different soil depths and vegetation and soil types. We used an elemental analyzer for soil total C (STC) and an inorganic carbon analyzer for soil inorganic C (SIC), and then defined the difference between STC and SIC as SOCCNS. In addition, we employed the modified Walkley-Black (MWB) method, hereafter SOCMWB. Our results showed that there was a strong correlation between SOCCNS and SOCMWB across the data set, given the application of a correction factor of 1.103. Soil depth and soil type significantly influenced on the recovery, defined as the ratio of SOCMWB to SOCCNS, and the recovery was closely associated with soil carbonate content and pH value as well. The differences of recovery between alpine meadow and steppe were largely driven by soil pH. In addition, statistically, a relatively strong correlation between SOCCNS and STC was also found, suggesting that it is feasible to estimate SOCCNS stocks through the STC data across the Tibetan grasslands. Therefore, our results suggest that in order to accurately estimate the absolute SOC stocks and its change in the Tibetan alpine grasslands, adequate correction of the modified WB measurements is essential with correct consideration of the effects of soil types, vegetation, soil pH and soil depth. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-23T06:55:20Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9ee27a8b73c14623af01ea19f5b1a026 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-23T06:55:20Z |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-9ee27a8b73c14623af01ea19f5b1a0262022-12-21T17:56:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012637210.1371/journal.pone.0126372A comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau.Litong ChenDan F B FlynnXin JingPeter KühnThomas ScholtenJin-Sheng HeAs CO2 concentrations continue to rise and drive global climate change, much effort has been put into estimating soil carbon (C) stocks and dynamics over time. However, the inconsistent methods employed by researchers hamper the comparability of such works, creating a pressing need to standardize the methods for soil organic C (SOC) quantification by the various methods. Here, we collected 712 soil samples from 36 sites of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau covering different soil depths and vegetation and soil types. We used an elemental analyzer for soil total C (STC) and an inorganic carbon analyzer for soil inorganic C (SIC), and then defined the difference between STC and SIC as SOCCNS. In addition, we employed the modified Walkley-Black (MWB) method, hereafter SOCMWB. Our results showed that there was a strong correlation between SOCCNS and SOCMWB across the data set, given the application of a correction factor of 1.103. Soil depth and soil type significantly influenced on the recovery, defined as the ratio of SOCMWB to SOCCNS, and the recovery was closely associated with soil carbonate content and pH value as well. The differences of recovery between alpine meadow and steppe were largely driven by soil pH. In addition, statistically, a relatively strong correlation between SOCCNS and STC was also found, suggesting that it is feasible to estimate SOCCNS stocks through the STC data across the Tibetan grasslands. Therefore, our results suggest that in order to accurately estimate the absolute SOC stocks and its change in the Tibetan alpine grasslands, adequate correction of the modified WB measurements is essential with correct consideration of the effects of soil types, vegetation, soil pH and soil depth.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4422439?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Litong Chen Dan F B Flynn Xin Jing Peter Kühn Thomas Scholten Jin-Sheng He A comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. PLoS ONE |
title | A comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. |
title_full | A comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. |
title_fullStr | A comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. |
title_short | A comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. |
title_sort | comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the tibetan plateau |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4422439?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT litongchen acomparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT danfbflynn acomparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT xinjing acomparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT peterkuhn acomparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT thomasscholten acomparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT jinshenghe acomparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT litongchen comparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT danfbflynn comparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT xinjing comparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT peterkuhn comparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT thomasscholten comparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau AT jinshenghe comparisonoftwomethodsforquantifyingsoilorganiccarbonofalpinegrasslandsonthetibetanplateau |