KEWENANGAN BPKP MELAKUKAN AUDIT INVESTIGASI TERHADAP KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR : 31/PUU-X/2012

Constitutional Court Decision No.31/PUU-X/2012 dated 25 April 2012 has rejected the petition of Ir. Eddie Widiono Suwondho, M.Sc (petitioner) regarding the inconsistency of Article 6 letter a of Law No.30/2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission. According to Government Regulation No.60/2008 o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: alfajri septianriandi
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: UIR Press 2023-12-01
Series:UIR Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/15521
_version_ 1797376509097279488
author alfajri septianriandi
author_facet alfajri septianriandi
author_sort alfajri septianriandi
collection DOAJ
description Constitutional Court Decision No.31/PUU-X/2012 dated 25 April 2012 has rejected the petition of Ir. Eddie Widiono Suwondho, M.Sc (petitioner) regarding the inconsistency of Article 6 letter a of Law No.30/2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission. According to Government Regulation No.60/2008 on Government Internal Control, BPKP is a government internal control apparatus that is directly responsible to the President. This means that BPKP has the authority to calculate state losses and conduct investigative audits. However, BPKP's authority has been limited by the constitution. BPKP can only conduct investigations based on data, clarification or audit information and documents provided by POLRI Investigators, Attorney Investigators and the KPK. This research uses the type of research systematics of legislation with a statutory approach. The focus of the problem studied is related to 1. What is the legal basis for BPKP's authority to conduct investigative audits? 2. How is the consideration of the Constitutional Court judges in the decision Number:31/PUU-X/2012 regarding the Authority of BPKP to Conduct Investigation Audit of State Financial Losses? The basis for the BPKP's authority to conduct investigative audits is contained in Article 27 of Presidential Regulation No.192 of 2014 concerning BPKP 2. The Constitutional Court judges' considerations regarding the applicant's request are unreasonable because according to the KPK Law, the KPK can coordinate with relevant agencies in order to prove an act of corruption, including with BPK and BPKP, which have been given their respective duties and authorities according to the laws and regulations.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:39:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9ee98f18ad3543e4b317e0c506dd26c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2548-7671
2548-768X
language Indonesian
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:39:39Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher UIR Press
record_format Article
series UIR Law Review
spelling doaj.art-9ee98f18ad3543e4b317e0c506dd26c42023-12-25T11:13:42ZindUIR PressUIR Law Review2548-76712548-768X2023-12-0161KEWENANGAN BPKP MELAKUKAN AUDIT INVESTIGASI TERHADAP KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR : 31/PUU-X/2012alfajri septianriandi Constitutional Court Decision No.31/PUU-X/2012 dated 25 April 2012 has rejected the petition of Ir. Eddie Widiono Suwondho, M.Sc (petitioner) regarding the inconsistency of Article 6 letter a of Law No.30/2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission. According to Government Regulation No.60/2008 on Government Internal Control, BPKP is a government internal control apparatus that is directly responsible to the President. This means that BPKP has the authority to calculate state losses and conduct investigative audits. However, BPKP's authority has been limited by the constitution. BPKP can only conduct investigations based on data, clarification or audit information and documents provided by POLRI Investigators, Attorney Investigators and the KPK. This research uses the type of research systematics of legislation with a statutory approach. The focus of the problem studied is related to 1. What is the legal basis for BPKP's authority to conduct investigative audits? 2. How is the consideration of the Constitutional Court judges in the decision Number:31/PUU-X/2012 regarding the Authority of BPKP to Conduct Investigation Audit of State Financial Losses? The basis for the BPKP's authority to conduct investigative audits is contained in Article 27 of Presidential Regulation No.192 of 2014 concerning BPKP 2. The Constitutional Court judges' considerations regarding the applicant's request are unreasonable because according to the KPK Law, the KPK can coordinate with relevant agencies in order to prove an act of corruption, including with BPK and BPKP, which have been given their respective duties and authorities according to the laws and regulations. https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/15521Constitutional Court, BPKP, Investigation, Authority, Corruption
spellingShingle alfajri septianriandi
KEWENANGAN BPKP MELAKUKAN AUDIT INVESTIGASI TERHADAP KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR : 31/PUU-X/2012
UIR Law Review
Constitutional Court, BPKP, Investigation, Authority, Corruption
title KEWENANGAN BPKP MELAKUKAN AUDIT INVESTIGASI TERHADAP KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR : 31/PUU-X/2012
title_full KEWENANGAN BPKP MELAKUKAN AUDIT INVESTIGASI TERHADAP KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR : 31/PUU-X/2012
title_fullStr KEWENANGAN BPKP MELAKUKAN AUDIT INVESTIGASI TERHADAP KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR : 31/PUU-X/2012
title_full_unstemmed KEWENANGAN BPKP MELAKUKAN AUDIT INVESTIGASI TERHADAP KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR : 31/PUU-X/2012
title_short KEWENANGAN BPKP MELAKUKAN AUDIT INVESTIGASI TERHADAP KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR : 31/PUU-X/2012
title_sort kewenangan bpkp melakukan audit investigasi terhadap kerugian keuangan negara pasca putusan mk nomor 31 puu x 2012
topic Constitutional Court, BPKP, Investigation, Authority, Corruption
url https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/uirlawreview/article/view/15521
work_keys_str_mv AT alfajriseptianriandi kewenanganbpkpmelakukanauditinvestigasiterhadapkerugiankeuangannegarapascaputusanmknomor31puux2012