MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted MyoRing implantation with concurrent corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) compared to MyoRing alone for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. Methods: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this randomized controlle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehrdad Mohammadpour, Ahmad Masoumi, Mahmoud Dehghan, Mohammad Nasser Hashemian, Shahab Addin Karami, Alireza Mahmoudi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Knowledge E 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7790
_version_ 1797989184473923584
author Mehrdad Mohammadpour
Ahmad Masoumi
Mahmoud Dehghan
Mohammad Nasser Hashemian
Shahab Addin Karami
Alireza Mahmoudi
author_facet Mehrdad Mohammadpour
Ahmad Masoumi
Mahmoud Dehghan
Mohammad Nasser Hashemian
Shahab Addin Karami
Alireza Mahmoudi
author_sort Mehrdad Mohammadpour
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted MyoRing implantation with concurrent corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) compared to MyoRing alone for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. Methods: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In the first group, MyoRing was implanted, while in the second, it was inserted in the corneal stroma using the same technique, along with simultaneous CXL. Visual, refractive, topographic, and abberometric outcomes were measured preoperatively and at every postoperative visit. Results: Data of 47 patients were available at the end of the study; 28 in the MyoRing group and 19 in the MyoRing + CXL group. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved from 0.79 ± 0.39 logMAR to 0.52 ± 0.31 logMAR (P < 0.05) in the MyoRing + CXL group and from 0.65 ± 0.38 logMAR to 0.62 ± 0.23 logMAR (P = 0.70) in the MyoRing group. CDVA changed from 0.33 ± 0.19 logMAR to 0.25 ± 0.16 logMAR (P = 0.10) in the MyoRing + CXL group and 0.32 ± 0.22 logMAR to 0.33 ± 0.17 logMAR (P > 0.50) in the MyoRing group. The mean keratometry (Km) decreased from 47.5 ± 2.7 D to 43.8 ± 3.2 D (P < 0.001) in the MyoRing group and 49.3 ± 3.4 D to 45.1 ± 3.0 D (P < 0.001) in the MyoRing + CXL group. Besides, horizontal coma was significantly lower in the MyoRing + CXL group (P = 0.022). Conclusion: MyoRing insertion combined with CXL is a safe and effective method for the treatment of keratoconus. The visual and topographic outcomes were comparable to that for MyoRing insertion after 10 months; however, horizontal coma was significantly lower in the MyoRing + CXL group.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T08:16:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9effae276497486ea1c3f878fe04a4af
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-322X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T08:16:10Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Knowledge E
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
spelling doaj.art-9effae276497486ea1c3f878fe04a4af2022-12-22T04:35:09ZengKnowledge EJournal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research2008-322X2020-10-011548649210.18502/jovr.v15i4.7790MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of KeratoconusMehrdad Mohammadpour0Ahmad Masoumi1Mahmoud Dehghan2Mohammad Nasser Hashemian3Shahab Addin Karami4Alireza Mahmoudi5 Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranPurpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted MyoRing implantation with concurrent corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) compared to MyoRing alone for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. Methods: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In the first group, MyoRing was implanted, while in the second, it was inserted in the corneal stroma using the same technique, along with simultaneous CXL. Visual, refractive, topographic, and abberometric outcomes were measured preoperatively and at every postoperative visit. Results: Data of 47 patients were available at the end of the study; 28 in the MyoRing group and 19 in the MyoRing + CXL group. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved from 0.79 ± 0.39 logMAR to 0.52 ± 0.31 logMAR (P < 0.05) in the MyoRing + CXL group and from 0.65 ± 0.38 logMAR to 0.62 ± 0.23 logMAR (P = 0.70) in the MyoRing group. CDVA changed from 0.33 ± 0.19 logMAR to 0.25 ± 0.16 logMAR (P = 0.10) in the MyoRing + CXL group and 0.32 ± 0.22 logMAR to 0.33 ± 0.17 logMAR (P > 0.50) in the MyoRing group. The mean keratometry (Km) decreased from 47.5 ± 2.7 D to 43.8 ± 3.2 D (P < 0.001) in the MyoRing group and 49.3 ± 3.4 D to 45.1 ± 3.0 D (P < 0.001) in the MyoRing + CXL group. Besides, horizontal coma was significantly lower in the MyoRing + CXL group (P = 0.022). Conclusion: MyoRing insertion combined with CXL is a safe and effective method for the treatment of keratoconus. The visual and topographic outcomes were comparable to that for MyoRing insertion after 10 months; however, horizontal coma was significantly lower in the MyoRing + CXL group.https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7790corneal collagen crosslinkingkeratoconusmyoring
spellingShingle Mehrdad Mohammadpour
Ahmad Masoumi
Mahmoud Dehghan
Mohammad Nasser Hashemian
Shahab Addin Karami
Alireza Mahmoudi
MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
corneal collagen crosslinking
keratoconus
myoring
title MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus
title_full MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus
title_fullStr MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus
title_short MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus
title_sort myoring implantation with and without corneal collagen crosslinking for the management of keratoconus
topic corneal collagen crosslinking
keratoconus
myoring
url https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7790
work_keys_str_mv AT mehrdadmohammadpour myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus
AT ahmadmasoumi myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus
AT mahmouddehghan myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus
AT mohammadnasserhashemian myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus
AT shahabaddinkarami myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus
AT alirezamahmoudi myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus