Sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.)

Aerosol radiative forcing estimates suffer from large uncertainties as a result of insufficient understanding of aerosol–cloud interactions. The main source of these uncertainties is dynamical processes such as turbulence and entrainment but also key aerosol parameters such as aerosol number c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Hammer, N. Bukowiecki, B. P. Luo, U. Lohmann, C. Marcolli, E. Weingartner, U. Baltensperger, C. R. Hoyle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-09-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/10309/2015/acp-15-10309-2015.pdf
_version_ 1819225595204075520
author E. Hammer
N. Bukowiecki
B. P. Luo
U. Lohmann
C. Marcolli
E. Weingartner
U. Baltensperger
C. R. Hoyle
author_facet E. Hammer
N. Bukowiecki
B. P. Luo
U. Lohmann
C. Marcolli
E. Weingartner
U. Baltensperger
C. R. Hoyle
author_sort E. Hammer
collection DOAJ
description Aerosol radiative forcing estimates suffer from large uncertainties as a result of insufficient understanding of aerosol–cloud interactions. The main source of these uncertainties is dynamical processes such as turbulence and entrainment but also key aerosol parameters such as aerosol number concentration and size distribution, and to a much lesser extent, the composition. From June to August 2011 a Cloud and Aerosol Characterization Experiment (CLACE2011) was performed at the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (Switzerland, 3580 m a.s.l.) focusing on the activation of aerosol to form liquid-phase clouds (in the cloud base temperature range of −8 to 5 °C). With a box model the sensitivity of the effective peak supersaturation (SS<sub>peak</sub>), an important parameter for cloud activation, to key aerosol and dynamical parameters was investigated. The updraft velocity, which defines the cooling rate of an air parcel, was found to have the greatest influence on SS<sub>peak</sub>. Small-scale variations in the cooling rate with large amplitudes can significantly alter CCN activation. Thus, an accurate knowledge of the air parcel history is required to estimate SS<sub>peak</sub>. The results show that the cloud base updraft velocities estimated from the horizontal wind measurements made at the Jungfraujoch can be divided by a factor of approximately 4 to get the updraft velocity required for the model to reproduce the observed SS<sub>peak</sub>. The aerosol number concentration and hygroscopic properties were found to be less important than the aerosol size in determining SS<sub>peak</sub>. Furthermore turbulence is found to have a maximum influence when SS<sub>peak</sub> is between approximately 0.2 and 0.4 %. Simulating the small-scale fluctuations with several amplitudes, frequencies and phases, revealed that independently of the amplitude, the effect of the frequency on SS<sub>peak</sub> shows a maximum at 0.46 Hz (median over all phases) and at higher frequencies, the maximum SS<sub>peak</sub> decreases again.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T10:12:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f0e74f94cd548d1b959dd78faf33da4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T10:12:05Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-9f0e74f94cd548d1b959dd78faf33da42022-12-21T17:50:55ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242015-09-011518103091032310.5194/acp-15-10309-2015Sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.)E. Hammer0N. Bukowiecki1B. P. Luo2U. Lohmann3C. Marcolli4E. Weingartner5U. Baltensperger6C. R. Hoyle7Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandAerosol radiative forcing estimates suffer from large uncertainties as a result of insufficient understanding of aerosol–cloud interactions. The main source of these uncertainties is dynamical processes such as turbulence and entrainment but also key aerosol parameters such as aerosol number concentration and size distribution, and to a much lesser extent, the composition. From June to August 2011 a Cloud and Aerosol Characterization Experiment (CLACE2011) was performed at the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (Switzerland, 3580 m a.s.l.) focusing on the activation of aerosol to form liquid-phase clouds (in the cloud base temperature range of −8 to 5 °C). With a box model the sensitivity of the effective peak supersaturation (SS<sub>peak</sub>), an important parameter for cloud activation, to key aerosol and dynamical parameters was investigated. The updraft velocity, which defines the cooling rate of an air parcel, was found to have the greatest influence on SS<sub>peak</sub>. Small-scale variations in the cooling rate with large amplitudes can significantly alter CCN activation. Thus, an accurate knowledge of the air parcel history is required to estimate SS<sub>peak</sub>. The results show that the cloud base updraft velocities estimated from the horizontal wind measurements made at the Jungfraujoch can be divided by a factor of approximately 4 to get the updraft velocity required for the model to reproduce the observed SS<sub>peak</sub>. The aerosol number concentration and hygroscopic properties were found to be less important than the aerosol size in determining SS<sub>peak</sub>. Furthermore turbulence is found to have a maximum influence when SS<sub>peak</sub> is between approximately 0.2 and 0.4 %. Simulating the small-scale fluctuations with several amplitudes, frequencies and phases, revealed that independently of the amplitude, the effect of the frequency on SS<sub>peak</sub> shows a maximum at 0.46 Hz (median over all phases) and at higher frequencies, the maximum SS<sub>peak</sub> decreases again.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/10309/2015/acp-15-10309-2015.pdf
spellingShingle E. Hammer
N. Bukowiecki
B. P. Luo
U. Lohmann
C. Marcolli
E. Weingartner
U. Baltensperger
C. R. Hoyle
Sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.)
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.)
title_full Sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.)
title_fullStr Sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.)
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.)
title_short Sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.)
title_sort sensitivity estimations for cloud droplet formation in the vicinity of the high alpine research station jungfraujoch 3580 m a s l
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/10309/2015/acp-15-10309-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ehammer sensitivityestimationsforclouddropletformationinthevicinityofthehighalpineresearchstationjungfraujoch3580masl
AT nbukowiecki sensitivityestimationsforclouddropletformationinthevicinityofthehighalpineresearchstationjungfraujoch3580masl
AT bpluo sensitivityestimationsforclouddropletformationinthevicinityofthehighalpineresearchstationjungfraujoch3580masl
AT ulohmann sensitivityestimationsforclouddropletformationinthevicinityofthehighalpineresearchstationjungfraujoch3580masl
AT cmarcolli sensitivityestimationsforclouddropletformationinthevicinityofthehighalpineresearchstationjungfraujoch3580masl
AT eweingartner sensitivityestimationsforclouddropletformationinthevicinityofthehighalpineresearchstationjungfraujoch3580masl
AT ubaltensperger sensitivityestimationsforclouddropletformationinthevicinityofthehighalpineresearchstationjungfraujoch3580masl
AT crhoyle sensitivityestimationsforclouddropletformationinthevicinityofthehighalpineresearchstationjungfraujoch3580masl