Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study

The insertion of pedicle screws in the lateral position without a position change has been reported. We completed a retrospective comparison of the radiologic and clinical outcomes of 36 patients who underwent either single-position oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SP-OLIF) using the O-arm (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyung Cheol Kim, Yeong Ha Jeong, Sung Han Oh, Jong Min Lee, Chang Kyu Lee, Seong Yi, Yoon Ha, Keung Nyun Kim, Dong Ah Shin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/1/312
_version_ 1797625483810045952
author Hyung Cheol Kim
Yeong Ha Jeong
Sung Han Oh
Jong Min Lee
Chang Kyu Lee
Seong Yi
Yoon Ha
Keung Nyun Kim
Dong Ah Shin
author_facet Hyung Cheol Kim
Yeong Ha Jeong
Sung Han Oh
Jong Min Lee
Chang Kyu Lee
Seong Yi
Yoon Ha
Keung Nyun Kim
Dong Ah Shin
author_sort Hyung Cheol Kim
collection DOAJ
description The insertion of pedicle screws in the lateral position without a position change has been reported. We completed a retrospective comparison of the radiologic and clinical outcomes of 36 patients who underwent either single-position oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SP-OLIF) using the O-arm (36 cases) or conventional OLIF (C-OLIF) using the C-arm (20 cases) for L2–5 single-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Radiological parameters were analyzed, including screw accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins classification system; GRS), segmental instability, and fusion status. Screw misplacement was defined as a discrepancy of ≥2 mm. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and postoperative complications, were assessed. The spinal fusion rate was not different between the SP-OLIF and C-OLIF groups one year after surgery (<i>p =</i> 0.536). The ODI score was lower (<i>p =</i> 0.015) in the SP-OLIF than the C-OLIF group. Physical (<i>p =</i> 0.000) and mental component summaries (<i>p =</i> 0.000) of the SF-36 were significantly higher in the SP-OLIF group. Overall complication rates, including revision, surgical site infection, ipsilateral weakness, and radicular pain/numbness, were not significantly different. SP-OLIF using the O-arm procedure is feasible, with acceptable accuracy, fusion rate, and complication rate. This may be an alternative to conventional two-stage operations.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:57:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f267f3619694a60b5246fd3326256a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:57:08Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-9f267f3619694a60b5246fd3326256a52023-11-16T15:44:24ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-12-0112131210.3390/jcm12010312Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative StudyHyung Cheol Kim0Yeong Ha Jeong1Sung Han Oh2Jong Min Lee3Chang Kyu Lee4Seong Yi5Yoon Ha6Keung Nyun Kim7Dong Ah Shin8Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, 20, Seohyeon-ro 180 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si 13590, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, International St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, 25, Simgok-ro 100 gil, Seo-gu, Incheon 54671, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, 20, Seohyeon-ro 180 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si 13590, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of KoreaThe insertion of pedicle screws in the lateral position without a position change has been reported. We completed a retrospective comparison of the radiologic and clinical outcomes of 36 patients who underwent either single-position oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SP-OLIF) using the O-arm (36 cases) or conventional OLIF (C-OLIF) using the C-arm (20 cases) for L2–5 single-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Radiological parameters were analyzed, including screw accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins classification system; GRS), segmental instability, and fusion status. Screw misplacement was defined as a discrepancy of ≥2 mm. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and postoperative complications, were assessed. The spinal fusion rate was not different between the SP-OLIF and C-OLIF groups one year after surgery (<i>p =</i> 0.536). The ODI score was lower (<i>p =</i> 0.015) in the SP-OLIF than the C-OLIF group. Physical (<i>p =</i> 0.000) and mental component summaries (<i>p =</i> 0.000) of the SF-36 were significantly higher in the SP-OLIF group. Overall complication rates, including revision, surgical site infection, ipsilateral weakness, and radicular pain/numbness, were not significantly different. SP-OLIF using the O-arm procedure is feasible, with acceptable accuracy, fusion rate, and complication rate. This may be an alternative to conventional two-stage operations.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/1/312oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusionminimally invasive surgeryO-arm navigationC-armspinal fusion
spellingShingle Hyung Cheol Kim
Yeong Ha Jeong
Sung Han Oh
Jong Min Lee
Chang Kyu Lee
Seong Yi
Yoon Ha
Keung Nyun Kim
Dong Ah Shin
Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Journal of Clinical Medicine
oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion
minimally invasive surgery
O-arm navigation
C-arm
spinal fusion
title Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_fullStr Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_short Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_sort single position oblique lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under o arm navigation a retrospective comparative study
topic oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion
minimally invasive surgery
O-arm navigation
C-arm
spinal fusion
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/1/312
work_keys_str_mv AT hyungcheolkim singlepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationunderoarmnavigationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT yeonghajeong singlepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationunderoarmnavigationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT sunghanoh singlepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationunderoarmnavigationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT jongminlee singlepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationunderoarmnavigationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT changkyulee singlepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationunderoarmnavigationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT seongyi singlepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationunderoarmnavigationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT yoonha singlepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationunderoarmnavigationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT keungnyunkim singlepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationunderoarmnavigationaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT dongahshin singlepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationunderoarmnavigationaretrospectivecomparativestudy