Quantification and Humanitarianism
Over the past 25 years, the humanitarian sector has become increasingly dominated by numbers. This has been reflected in the growth of academic work that explores this relationship between humanitarianism and quantification. The most recent contribution to this literature is Joël Glasman’s Humanitar...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Manchester University Press
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Humanitarian Affairs |
Subjects: |
_version_ | 1818238526351736832 |
---|---|
author | Brendan T. Lawson |
author_facet | Brendan T. Lawson |
author_sort | Brendan T. Lawson |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Over the past 25 years, the humanitarian sector has become increasingly dominated by numbers. This has been reflected in the growth of academic work that explores this relationship between humanitarianism and quantification. The most recent contribution to this literature is Joël Glasman’s Humanitarianism and the Quantification of Humanitarian Needs. Through his empirical and theoretical contributions, Glasman draws our attention to the different ways that academics approach this topic. These four strands structure the literature review: knowledge – the technical difficulties in quantifying phenomena; governance – how numbers help humanitarian organisations manage the sector; effects – the impact that quantification has had on the sector as a whole; meaning – the importance of rhetoric, discourse, representation and communication when it comes to understanding the quantitative. As part of the review, the essay also identifies how academics can better engage with each of the four strands. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T12:43:03Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9f2d7500611e41828d7e2a5922dc9ab8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2515-6411 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T12:43:03Z |
publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
publisher | Manchester University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Humanitarian Affairs |
spelling | doaj.art-9f2d7500611e41828d7e2a5922dc9ab82022-12-22T00:24:11ZengManchester University PressJournal of Humanitarian Affairs2515-64112021-07-0131536010.7227/JHA.059Quantification and HumanitarianismBrendan T. Lawson0University teacher in Media and Communication, University of LoughboroughOver the past 25 years, the humanitarian sector has become increasingly dominated by numbers. This has been reflected in the growth of academic work that explores this relationship between humanitarianism and quantification. The most recent contribution to this literature is Joël Glasman’s Humanitarianism and the Quantification of Humanitarian Needs. Through his empirical and theoretical contributions, Glasman draws our attention to the different ways that academics approach this topic. These four strands structure the literature review: knowledge – the technical difficulties in quantifying phenomena; governance – how numbers help humanitarian organisations manage the sector; effects – the impact that quantification has had on the sector as a whole; meaning – the importance of rhetoric, discourse, representation and communication when it comes to understanding the quantitative. As part of the review, the essay also identifies how academics can better engage with each of the four strands.quantificationdatanumbershumanitarianismgovernance |
spellingShingle | Brendan T. Lawson Quantification and Humanitarianism Journal of Humanitarian Affairs quantification data numbers humanitarianism governance |
title | Quantification and Humanitarianism |
title_full | Quantification and Humanitarianism |
title_fullStr | Quantification and Humanitarianism |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification and Humanitarianism |
title_short | Quantification and Humanitarianism |
title_sort | quantification and humanitarianism |
topic | quantification data numbers humanitarianism governance |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brendantlawson quantificationandhumanitarianism |