Quantification and Humanitarianism

Over the past 25 years, the humanitarian sector has become increasingly dominated by numbers. This has been reflected in the growth of academic work that explores this relationship between humanitarianism and quantification. The most recent contribution to this literature is Joël Glasman’s Humanitar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brendan T. Lawson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manchester University Press 2021-07-01
Series:Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
Subjects:
_version_ 1818238526351736832
author Brendan T. Lawson
author_facet Brendan T. Lawson
author_sort Brendan T. Lawson
collection DOAJ
description Over the past 25 years, the humanitarian sector has become increasingly dominated by numbers. This has been reflected in the growth of academic work that explores this relationship between humanitarianism and quantification. The most recent contribution to this literature is Joël Glasman’s Humanitarianism and the Quantification of Humanitarian Needs. Through his empirical and theoretical contributions, Glasman draws our attention to the different ways that academics approach this topic. These four strands structure the literature review: knowledge – the technical difficulties in quantifying phenomena; governance – how numbers help humanitarian organisations manage the sector; effects – the impact that quantification has had on the sector as a whole; meaning – the importance of rhetoric, discourse, representation and communication when it comes to understanding the quantitative. As part of the review, the essay also identifies how academics can better engage with each of the four strands.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T12:43:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f2d7500611e41828d7e2a5922dc9ab8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2515-6411
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T12:43:03Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Manchester University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
spelling doaj.art-9f2d7500611e41828d7e2a5922dc9ab82022-12-22T00:24:11ZengManchester University PressJournal of Humanitarian Affairs2515-64112021-07-0131536010.7227/JHA.059Quantification and HumanitarianismBrendan T. Lawson0University teacher in Media and Communication, University of LoughboroughOver the past 25 years, the humanitarian sector has become increasingly dominated by numbers. This has been reflected in the growth of academic work that explores this relationship between humanitarianism and quantification. The most recent contribution to this literature is Joël Glasman’s Humanitarianism and the Quantification of Humanitarian Needs. Through his empirical and theoretical contributions, Glasman draws our attention to the different ways that academics approach this topic. These four strands structure the literature review: knowledge – the technical difficulties in quantifying phenomena; governance – how numbers help humanitarian organisations manage the sector; effects – the impact that quantification has had on the sector as a whole; meaning – the importance of rhetoric, discourse, representation and communication when it comes to understanding the quantitative. As part of the review, the essay also identifies how academics can better engage with each of the four strands.quantificationdatanumbershumanitarianismgovernance
spellingShingle Brendan T. Lawson
Quantification and Humanitarianism
Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
quantification
data
numbers
humanitarianism
governance
title Quantification and Humanitarianism
title_full Quantification and Humanitarianism
title_fullStr Quantification and Humanitarianism
title_full_unstemmed Quantification and Humanitarianism
title_short Quantification and Humanitarianism
title_sort quantification and humanitarianism
topic quantification
data
numbers
humanitarianism
governance
work_keys_str_mv AT brendantlawson quantificationandhumanitarianism