Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence Index
There is increasing pressure from developers toward architects and engineers to deliver scientifically sound proposals for often complex and cost-intensive construction products. An increase in digitalization within the construction industry and the availability of intelligently built assets and ove...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/13/5894 |
_version_ | 1797528816317366272 |
---|---|
author | Géza Fischl Peter Johansson |
author_facet | Géza Fischl Peter Johansson |
author_sort | Géza Fischl |
collection | DOAJ |
description | There is increasing pressure from developers toward architects and engineers to deliver scientifically sound proposals for often complex and cost-intensive construction products. An increase in digitalization within the construction industry and the availability of intelligently built assets and overall sustainability make it possible to customize a construction product. This servitization of construction products is assumed to perform much preferably in satisfying stakeholders’ physical, psychological, and social needs. The degree to which these products are performing can be evaluated through an evidence index. This article aims to introduce a conceptual model of an evidence index and test it in the programming stage of a case study. The investigation follows the evidence-based design approach and renders evidence through key performance indicators in the programming stage of the building process. For testing the concept, a case study investigation was performed by simulating a novice research assistant, and the amount of evidence was collected and appraised for evidence index. The case study showed that key performance indicators of a servitized project could be evaluated on a four-point scale. The quality of the evidence index generation depended on the level of expertise the evaluator has in research and the skilful use of scientific databases. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T10:04:48Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9f30e5b509ee4f52a58263eb12c8e142 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3417 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T10:04:48Z |
publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Applied Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-9f30e5b509ee4f52a58263eb12c8e1422023-11-22T01:39:17ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-06-011113589410.3390/app11135894Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence IndexGéza Fischl0Peter Johansson1Department of Construction Engineering and Lighting Science, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, 553 18 Jönköping, SwedenDepartment of Construction Engineering and Lighting Science, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, 553 18 Jönköping, SwedenThere is increasing pressure from developers toward architects and engineers to deliver scientifically sound proposals for often complex and cost-intensive construction products. An increase in digitalization within the construction industry and the availability of intelligently built assets and overall sustainability make it possible to customize a construction product. This servitization of construction products is assumed to perform much preferably in satisfying stakeholders’ physical, psychological, and social needs. The degree to which these products are performing can be evaluated through an evidence index. This article aims to introduce a conceptual model of an evidence index and test it in the programming stage of a case study. The investigation follows the evidence-based design approach and renders evidence through key performance indicators in the programming stage of the building process. For testing the concept, a case study investigation was performed by simulating a novice research assistant, and the amount of evidence was collected and appraised for evidence index. The case study showed that key performance indicators of a servitized project could be evaluated on a four-point scale. The quality of the evidence index generation depended on the level of expertise the evaluator has in research and the skilful use of scientific databases.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/13/5894construction productservitizationevidence-based designlevel of evidencecognitive buildings |
spellingShingle | Géza Fischl Peter Johansson Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence Index Applied Sciences construction product servitization evidence-based design level of evidence cognitive buildings |
title | Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence Index |
title_full | Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence Index |
title_fullStr | Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence Index |
title_full_unstemmed | Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence Index |
title_short | Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence Index |
title_sort | transforming building criteria to evidence index |
topic | construction product servitization evidence-based design level of evidence cognitive buildings |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/13/5894 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gezafischl transformingbuildingcriteriatoevidenceindex AT peterjohansson transformingbuildingcriteriatoevidenceindex |