Female Perceptions On Employment Equity: Is The Glass Ceiling Cracking?

The primary objective of this study was to assess if there were any perceptual differences between gender groups regarding employment equity practices. A sample of 4729 participants from different companies and industries completed the Employment Equity Questionnaire. Results from an ANOVA indicated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Betsi Van Zyl, Gert Roodt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2003-11-01
Series:SA Journal of Human Resource Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/12
_version_ 1818247071262572544
author Betsi Van Zyl
Gert Roodt
author_facet Betsi Van Zyl
Gert Roodt
author_sort Betsi Van Zyl
collection DOAJ
description The primary objective of this study was to assess if there were any perceptual differences between gender groups regarding employment equity practices. A sample of 4729 participants from different companies and industries completed the Employment Equity Questionnaire. Results from an ANOVA indicated that there were significant differences between gender groups, but only a small portion of the variance was explained by perceptual differences on employment equity practices. The instrument thus possesses some discriminant validity. Further analyses on an item level indicated that there were significant differences between gender groups, but these differences were not attributable to gender stereotypes. Specific employment equity practices were identified that need closer attention from management’s side to address gender discrimination. Opsomming Die primêre doelwit van hierdie studie was om vas te stel of daar enige perseptuele verskille tussen geslagsgroepe bestaan ten opsigte van werkgelykheidspraktyke. ’n Steekproef van 4729 deelnemers uit verskillende ondernemings en bedrywe het die Employment Equity Questionnaire voltooi. Die resultate van ’n ANOVA het aangedui dat daar beduidende verskille tussen geslagsgroepe bestaan, maar dat slegs ’n klein gedeelte van die variansie aan perseptuele verskille ten opsigte van werksgelykheidspraktyke toegeskryf kan word. Die instrument beskik dus ook ’n mate van diskriminante geldigheid. Verdere ontledings op itemvlak het aangedui dat daar betekenisvolle verskille tussen geslagsgroepe is, maar dat hierdie verskille nie aan geslagstereotipes toegeskryf kan word nie. Spesifieke werkgelykheidspraktyke is geïdentifiseer wat nadere aandag deur die bestuurskader verdien om geslagsdiskriminasie aan te spreek.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T14:58:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f3271179c9449c9a8517f2d91b55590
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1683-7584
2071-078X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T14:58:52Z
publishDate 2003-11-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series SA Journal of Human Resource Management
spelling doaj.art-9f3271179c9449c9a8517f2d91b555902022-12-22T00:20:51ZengAOSISSA Journal of Human Resource Management1683-75842071-078X2003-11-011210.4102/sajhrm.v1i2.1212Female Perceptions On Employment Equity: Is The Glass Ceiling Cracking?Betsi Van Zyl0Gert Roodt1RAU UniversityRAU UniversityThe primary objective of this study was to assess if there were any perceptual differences between gender groups regarding employment equity practices. A sample of 4729 participants from different companies and industries completed the Employment Equity Questionnaire. Results from an ANOVA indicated that there were significant differences between gender groups, but only a small portion of the variance was explained by perceptual differences on employment equity practices. The instrument thus possesses some discriminant validity. Further analyses on an item level indicated that there were significant differences between gender groups, but these differences were not attributable to gender stereotypes. Specific employment equity practices were identified that need closer attention from management’s side to address gender discrimination. Opsomming Die primêre doelwit van hierdie studie was om vas te stel of daar enige perseptuele verskille tussen geslagsgroepe bestaan ten opsigte van werkgelykheidspraktyke. ’n Steekproef van 4729 deelnemers uit verskillende ondernemings en bedrywe het die Employment Equity Questionnaire voltooi. Die resultate van ’n ANOVA het aangedui dat daar beduidende verskille tussen geslagsgroepe bestaan, maar dat slegs ’n klein gedeelte van die variansie aan perseptuele verskille ten opsigte van werksgelykheidspraktyke toegeskryf kan word. Die instrument beskik dus ook ’n mate van diskriminante geldigheid. Verdere ontledings op itemvlak het aangedui dat daar betekenisvolle verskille tussen geslagsgroepe is, maar dat hierdie verskille nie aan geslagstereotipes toegeskryf kan word nie. Spesifieke werkgelykheidspraktyke is geïdentifiseer wat nadere aandag deur die bestuurskader verdien om geslagsdiskriminasie aan te spreek.https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/12Female Perceptions On Employment Equity
spellingShingle Betsi Van Zyl
Gert Roodt
Female Perceptions On Employment Equity: Is The Glass Ceiling Cracking?
SA Journal of Human Resource Management
Female Perceptions On Employment Equity
title Female Perceptions On Employment Equity: Is The Glass Ceiling Cracking?
title_full Female Perceptions On Employment Equity: Is The Glass Ceiling Cracking?
title_fullStr Female Perceptions On Employment Equity: Is The Glass Ceiling Cracking?
title_full_unstemmed Female Perceptions On Employment Equity: Is The Glass Ceiling Cracking?
title_short Female Perceptions On Employment Equity: Is The Glass Ceiling Cracking?
title_sort female perceptions on employment equity is the glass ceiling cracking
topic Female Perceptions On Employment Equity
url https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/12
work_keys_str_mv AT betsivanzyl femaleperceptionsonemploymentequityistheglassceilingcracking
AT gertroodt femaleperceptionsonemploymentequityistheglassceilingcracking