A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains
This paper presents a framework for studying design thinking. Three paradigmatic approaches are described to measure design cognitive processes: design cognition, design physiology and design neurocognition. Specific tools and methods serve each paradigmatic approach. Design cognition is explored th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Design Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000153/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1811156448917323776 |
---|---|
author | John S. Gero Julie Milovanovic |
author_facet | John S. Gero Julie Milovanovic |
author_sort | John S. Gero |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper presents a framework for studying design thinking. Three paradigmatic approaches are described to measure design cognitive processes: design cognition, design physiology and design neurocognition. Specific tools and methods serve each paradigmatic approach. Design cognition is explored through protocol analysis, black-box experiments, surveys and interviews. Design physiology is measured with eye tracking, electrodermal activity, heart rate and emotion tracking. Design neurocognition is measured using electroencephalography, functional near infrared spectroscopy and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Illustrative examples are presented to describe the types of results each method provides about the characteristics of design thinking, such as design patterns, design reasoning, design creativity, design collaboration, the co-evolution of the problem solution space, or design analysis and evaluation. The triangulation of results from the three paradigmatic approaches to studying design thinking provides a synergistic foundation for the understanding of design cognitive processes. Results from such studies generate a source of feedback to designers, design educators and researchers in design science. New models, new tools and new research questions emerge from the integrated approach proposed and lay down future challenges in studying design thinking. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:51:47Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9f3b13a827d24950bc5e92747c459eea |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2053-4701 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:51:47Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Design Science |
spelling | doaj.art-9f3b13a827d24950bc5e92747c459eea2023-03-09T12:32:01ZengCambridge University PressDesign Science2053-47012020-01-01610.1017/dsj.2020.15A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brainsJohn S. Gero0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9026-535XJulie Milovanovic1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8643-9812University of North Carolina, CharlotteAAU CRENAU Graduate School of Architecture NantesThis paper presents a framework for studying design thinking. Three paradigmatic approaches are described to measure design cognitive processes: design cognition, design physiology and design neurocognition. Specific tools and methods serve each paradigmatic approach. Design cognition is explored through protocol analysis, black-box experiments, surveys and interviews. Design physiology is measured with eye tracking, electrodermal activity, heart rate and emotion tracking. Design neurocognition is measured using electroencephalography, functional near infrared spectroscopy and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Illustrative examples are presented to describe the types of results each method provides about the characteristics of design thinking, such as design patterns, design reasoning, design creativity, design collaboration, the co-evolution of the problem solution space, or design analysis and evaluation. The triangulation of results from the three paradigmatic approaches to studying design thinking provides a synergistic foundation for the understanding of design cognitive processes. Results from such studies generate a source of feedback to designers, design educators and researchers in design science. New models, new tools and new research questions emerge from the integrated approach proposed and lay down future challenges in studying design thinking.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000153/type/journal_articledesign scienceprotocol analysisdesign cognitiondesign physiologydesign neurocognition |
spellingShingle | John S. Gero Julie Milovanovic A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains Design Science design science protocol analysis design cognition design physiology design neurocognition |
title | A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains |
title_full | A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains |
title_fullStr | A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains |
title_full_unstemmed | A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains |
title_short | A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains |
title_sort | framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers minds bodies and brains |
topic | design science protocol analysis design cognition design physiology design neurocognition |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000153/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsgero aframeworkforstudyingdesignthinkingthroughmeasuringdesignersmindsbodiesandbrains AT juliemilovanovic aframeworkforstudyingdesignthinkingthroughmeasuringdesignersmindsbodiesandbrains AT johnsgero frameworkforstudyingdesignthinkingthroughmeasuringdesignersmindsbodiesandbrains AT juliemilovanovic frameworkforstudyingdesignthinkingthroughmeasuringdesignersmindsbodiesandbrains |