Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender

In our society interaction with robots is becoming more and more frequent since robots are not only used in the industry, but increasingly often in assistance and in health system. Perception of robots and their movements is crucial for their acceptance. Here we shortly review basic mechanisms of pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miriam Abel, Giovanni Buccino, Ferdinand Binkofski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295279/full
_version_ 1797338436804280320
author Miriam Abel
Giovanni Buccino
Ferdinand Binkofski
Ferdinand Binkofski
author_facet Miriam Abel
Giovanni Buccino
Ferdinand Binkofski
Ferdinand Binkofski
author_sort Miriam Abel
collection DOAJ
description In our society interaction with robots is becoming more and more frequent since robots are not only used in the industry, but increasingly often in assistance and in health system. Perception of robots and their movements is crucial for their acceptance. Here we shortly review basic mechanisms of perception of actions, and then of perception of robotic and human movements. The literature demonstrates that there are commonalities, but also differences in the perception of human and robotic movements. Especially interesting are biologic gender differences in the perception of robotic movements. The results show that males seem to be more sensitive to the differences between robotic and anthropomorphic movements, whereas females seem not to perceive such differences. However, females transfer more anthropomorphic features to robotic movements. While looking at the brain activation during perception of humanoid and robotic movements in different genders one can conclude that different strategies are used; female seem to analyse robotic movements online, while male seem to use previous knowledge from interaction with robots. Further research is needed to specify more such gender differences.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:31:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f46cc17fbac4510bdb50a3fab8e3bca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:31:10Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-9f46cc17fbac4510bdb50a3fab8e3bca2024-01-31T04:24:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782024-01-011510.3389/fpsyg.2024.12952791295279Perception of robotic actions and the influence of genderMiriam Abel0Giovanni Buccino1Ferdinand Binkofski2Ferdinand Binkofski3Special Education and Rehabilitation of Speech and Language Disabilities, Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Neuroscience, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyResearch Center Juelich GmbH, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Juelich, GermanyDivision for Clinical Cognitive Sciences, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, GermanyIn our society interaction with robots is becoming more and more frequent since robots are not only used in the industry, but increasingly often in assistance and in health system. Perception of robots and their movements is crucial for their acceptance. Here we shortly review basic mechanisms of perception of actions, and then of perception of robotic and human movements. The literature demonstrates that there are commonalities, but also differences in the perception of human and robotic movements. Especially interesting are biologic gender differences in the perception of robotic movements. The results show that males seem to be more sensitive to the differences between robotic and anthropomorphic movements, whereas females seem not to perceive such differences. However, females transfer more anthropomorphic features to robotic movements. While looking at the brain activation during perception of humanoid and robotic movements in different genders one can conclude that different strategies are used; female seem to analyse robotic movements online, while male seem to use previous knowledge from interaction with robots. Further research is needed to specify more such gender differences.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295279/fullaction observation systemmirror neuron system (MNS)perception of robotic movementsperception of humanoid movementsgender influence on perception of robotic movements
spellingShingle Miriam Abel
Giovanni Buccino
Ferdinand Binkofski
Ferdinand Binkofski
Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender
Frontiers in Psychology
action observation system
mirror neuron system (MNS)
perception of robotic movements
perception of humanoid movements
gender influence on perception of robotic movements
title Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender
title_full Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender
title_fullStr Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender
title_full_unstemmed Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender
title_short Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender
title_sort perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender
topic action observation system
mirror neuron system (MNS)
perception of robotic movements
perception of humanoid movements
gender influence on perception of robotic movements
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295279/full
work_keys_str_mv AT miriamabel perceptionofroboticactionsandtheinfluenceofgender
AT giovannibuccino perceptionofroboticactionsandtheinfluenceofgender
AT ferdinandbinkofski perceptionofroboticactionsandtheinfluenceofgender
AT ferdinandbinkofski perceptionofroboticactionsandtheinfluenceofgender