Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender
In our society interaction with robots is becoming more and more frequent since robots are not only used in the industry, but increasingly often in assistance and in health system. Perception of robots and their movements is crucial for their acceptance. Here we shortly review basic mechanisms of pe...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295279/full |
_version_ | 1797338436804280320 |
---|---|
author | Miriam Abel Giovanni Buccino Ferdinand Binkofski Ferdinand Binkofski |
author_facet | Miriam Abel Giovanni Buccino Ferdinand Binkofski Ferdinand Binkofski |
author_sort | Miriam Abel |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In our society interaction with robots is becoming more and more frequent since robots are not only used in the industry, but increasingly often in assistance and in health system. Perception of robots and their movements is crucial for their acceptance. Here we shortly review basic mechanisms of perception of actions, and then of perception of robotic and human movements. The literature demonstrates that there are commonalities, but also differences in the perception of human and robotic movements. Especially interesting are biologic gender differences in the perception of robotic movements. The results show that males seem to be more sensitive to the differences between robotic and anthropomorphic movements, whereas females seem not to perceive such differences. However, females transfer more anthropomorphic features to robotic movements. While looking at the brain activation during perception of humanoid and robotic movements in different genders one can conclude that different strategies are used; female seem to analyse robotic movements online, while male seem to use previous knowledge from interaction with robots. Further research is needed to specify more such gender differences. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T09:31:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9f46cc17fbac4510bdb50a3fab8e3bca |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-1078 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T09:31:10Z |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Psychology |
spelling | doaj.art-9f46cc17fbac4510bdb50a3fab8e3bca2024-01-31T04:24:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782024-01-011510.3389/fpsyg.2024.12952791295279Perception of robotic actions and the influence of genderMiriam Abel0Giovanni Buccino1Ferdinand Binkofski2Ferdinand Binkofski3Special Education and Rehabilitation of Speech and Language Disabilities, Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Neuroscience, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyResearch Center Juelich GmbH, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Juelich, GermanyDivision for Clinical Cognitive Sciences, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, GermanyIn our society interaction with robots is becoming more and more frequent since robots are not only used in the industry, but increasingly often in assistance and in health system. Perception of robots and their movements is crucial for their acceptance. Here we shortly review basic mechanisms of perception of actions, and then of perception of robotic and human movements. The literature demonstrates that there are commonalities, but also differences in the perception of human and robotic movements. Especially interesting are biologic gender differences in the perception of robotic movements. The results show that males seem to be more sensitive to the differences between robotic and anthropomorphic movements, whereas females seem not to perceive such differences. However, females transfer more anthropomorphic features to robotic movements. While looking at the brain activation during perception of humanoid and robotic movements in different genders one can conclude that different strategies are used; female seem to analyse robotic movements online, while male seem to use previous knowledge from interaction with robots. Further research is needed to specify more such gender differences.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295279/fullaction observation systemmirror neuron system (MNS)perception of robotic movementsperception of humanoid movementsgender influence on perception of robotic movements |
spellingShingle | Miriam Abel Giovanni Buccino Ferdinand Binkofski Ferdinand Binkofski Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender Frontiers in Psychology action observation system mirror neuron system (MNS) perception of robotic movements perception of humanoid movements gender influence on perception of robotic movements |
title | Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender |
title_full | Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender |
title_fullStr | Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender |
title_full_unstemmed | Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender |
title_short | Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender |
title_sort | perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender |
topic | action observation system mirror neuron system (MNS) perception of robotic movements perception of humanoid movements gender influence on perception of robotic movements |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295279/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miriamabel perceptionofroboticactionsandtheinfluenceofgender AT giovannibuccino perceptionofroboticactionsandtheinfluenceofgender AT ferdinandbinkofski perceptionofroboticactionsandtheinfluenceofgender AT ferdinandbinkofski perceptionofroboticactionsandtheinfluenceofgender |