«A lot of quotes, a lot of grief, but little scientific» A few comments on the discussion (questions to the authors of the review and article) «The crisis of natural science and humanitarian approaches in psychiatry»

The discourse is based on a review (article) by I.M.Zislin on an article by N.G. Neznanov et al. (Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology. 2019;1: 8-15). Based on the methodology and philosophy of science, the key words of the review are discussed. The subject of psychiatry as a medical (clinica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G N Nosachev, I G Nosachev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Federal State Budget Scientific Institution National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology n.a. V.M. Bekhterev Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation 2022-04-01
Series:Обозрение психиатрии и медицинской психологии имени В.М. Бехтерева
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bekhterevreview.com/jour/article/view/653
_version_ 1797698842434469888
author G N Nosachev
I G Nosachev
author_facet G N Nosachev
I G Nosachev
author_sort G N Nosachev
collection DOAJ
description The discourse is based on a review (article) by I.M.Zislin on an article by N.G. Neznanov et al. (Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology. 2019;1: 8-15). Based on the methodology and philosophy of science, the key words of the review are discussed. The subject of psychiatry as a medical (clinical) science is analyzed — the same for all its sections, taking into account the principle of demarcation. The humanitarian approach is reduced to the humanitarian (axiological, pragmatic) paradigm of psychiatry, in particular, the crisis of psychology. The importance of including spirituality in the biopsychosocial model (BPS model), mainly through psychotherapy, is pointed out.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:59:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f5296d9762949ee92a4403eb3ba04cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-7053
2713-055X
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:59:52Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Federal State Budget Scientific Institution National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology n.a. V.M. Bekhterev Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
record_format Article
series Обозрение психиатрии и медицинской психологии имени В.М. Бехтерева
spelling doaj.art-9f5296d9762949ee92a4403eb3ba04cb2023-09-03T11:45:17ZrusFederal State Budget Scientific Institution National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology n.a. V.M. Bekhterev Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationОбозрение психиатрии и медицинской психологии имени В.М. Бехтерева2313-70532713-055X2022-04-01561253310.31363/2313-7053-2022-56-1-25-33435«A lot of quotes, a lot of grief, but little scientific» A few comments on the discussion (questions to the authors of the review and article) «The crisis of natural science and humanitarian approaches in psychiatry»G N Nosachev0I G Nosachev1Samara State Medical UniversitySamara State Medical UniversityThe discourse is based on a review (article) by I.M.Zislin on an article by N.G. Neznanov et al. (Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology. 2019;1: 8-15). Based on the methodology and philosophy of science, the key words of the review are discussed. The subject of psychiatry as a medical (clinical) science is analyzed — the same for all its sections, taking into account the principle of demarcation. The humanitarian approach is reduced to the humanitarian (axiological, pragmatic) paradigm of psychiatry, in particular, the crisis of psychology. The importance of including spirituality in the biopsychosocial model (BPS model), mainly through psychotherapy, is pointed out.https://www.bekhterevreview.com/jour/article/view/653the subject of psychiatrythe crisis of the humanitarian paradigmthe bps model and the spirituality of psychotherapy
spellingShingle G N Nosachev
I G Nosachev
«A lot of quotes, a lot of grief, but little scientific» A few comments on the discussion (questions to the authors of the review and article) «The crisis of natural science and humanitarian approaches in psychiatry»
Обозрение психиатрии и медицинской психологии имени В.М. Бехтерева
the subject of psychiatry
the crisis of the humanitarian paradigm
the bps model and the spirituality of psychotherapy
title «A lot of quotes, a lot of grief, but little scientific» A few comments on the discussion (questions to the authors of the review and article) «The crisis of natural science and humanitarian approaches in psychiatry»
title_full «A lot of quotes, a lot of grief, but little scientific» A few comments on the discussion (questions to the authors of the review and article) «The crisis of natural science and humanitarian approaches in psychiatry»
title_fullStr «A lot of quotes, a lot of grief, but little scientific» A few comments on the discussion (questions to the authors of the review and article) «The crisis of natural science and humanitarian approaches in psychiatry»
title_full_unstemmed «A lot of quotes, a lot of grief, but little scientific» A few comments on the discussion (questions to the authors of the review and article) «The crisis of natural science and humanitarian approaches in psychiatry»
title_short «A lot of quotes, a lot of grief, but little scientific» A few comments on the discussion (questions to the authors of the review and article) «The crisis of natural science and humanitarian approaches in psychiatry»
title_sort a lot of quotes a lot of grief but little scientific a few comments on the discussion questions to the authors of the review and article the crisis of natural science and humanitarian approaches in psychiatry
topic the subject of psychiatry
the crisis of the humanitarian paradigm
the bps model and the spirituality of psychotherapy
url https://www.bekhterevreview.com/jour/article/view/653
work_keys_str_mv AT gnnosachev alotofquotesalotofgriefbutlittlescientificafewcommentsonthediscussionquestionstotheauthorsofthereviewandarticlethecrisisofnaturalscienceandhumanitarianapproachesinpsychiatry
AT ignosachev alotofquotesalotofgriefbutlittlescientificafewcommentsonthediscussionquestionstotheauthorsofthereviewandarticlethecrisisofnaturalscienceandhumanitarianapproachesinpsychiatry