External validation and updating of prediction models of bleeding risk in patients with cancer receiving anticoagulants

Objective Patients with cancer are at increased bleeding risk, and anticoagulants increase this risk even more. Yet, validated bleeding risk models for prediction of bleeding risk in patients with cancer are lacking. The aim of this study is to predict bleeding risk in anticoagulated patients with c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: FH Rutten, M van Smeden, EM Trinks-Roerdink, GJ Geersing, MEW Hemels, IC van Gelder, FA Klok, S van Doorn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-01
Series:Open Heart
Online Access:https://openheart.bmj.com/content/10/1/e002273.full
_version_ 1797847371912052736
author FH Rutten
M van Smeden
EM Trinks-Roerdink
GJ Geersing
MEW Hemels
IC van Gelder
FA Klok
S van Doorn
author_facet FH Rutten
M van Smeden
EM Trinks-Roerdink
GJ Geersing
MEW Hemels
IC van Gelder
FA Klok
S van Doorn
author_sort FH Rutten
collection DOAJ
description Objective Patients with cancer are at increased bleeding risk, and anticoagulants increase this risk even more. Yet, validated bleeding risk models for prediction of bleeding risk in patients with cancer are lacking. The aim of this study is to predict bleeding risk in anticoagulated patients with cancer.Methods We performed a study using the routine healthcare database of the Julius General Practitioners’ Network. Five bleeding risk models were selected for external validation. Patients with a new cancer episode during anticoagulant treatment or those initiating anticoagulation during active cancer were included. The outcome was the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. Next, we internally validated an updated bleeding risk model accounting for the competing risk of death.Results The validation cohort consisted of 1304 patients with cancer, mean age 74.0±10.9 years, 52.2% males. In total 215 (16.5%) patients developed a first major or CRNM bleeding during a mean follow-up of 1.5 years (incidence rate; 11.0 per 100 person-years (95% CI 9.6 to 12.5)). The c-statistics of all selected bleeding risk models were low, around 0.56. Internal validation of an updated model accounting for death as competing risk showed a slightly improved c-statistic of 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.70). On updating, only age and a history of bleeding appeared to contribute to the prediction of bleeding risk.Conclusions Existing bleeding risk models cannot accurately differentiate bleeding risk between patients. Future studies may use our updated model as a starting point for further development of bleeding risk models in patients with cancer.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T18:10:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f623f049bf3472b8c31be31d3798081
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2053-3624
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T18:10:21Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Open Heart
spelling doaj.art-9f623f049bf3472b8c31be31d37980812023-04-13T21:30:06ZengBMJ Publishing GroupOpen Heart2053-36242023-04-0110110.1136/openhrt-2023-002273External validation and updating of prediction models of bleeding risk in patients with cancer receiving anticoagulantsFH Rutten0M van Smeden1EM Trinks-Roerdink2GJ Geersing3MEW Hemels4IC van Gelder5FA Klok6S van Doorn7Department of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMCU, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Economics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMCU, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMCU, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMCU, Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, UMCG, Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, LUMC, Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMCU, Utrecht, The NetherlandsObjective Patients with cancer are at increased bleeding risk, and anticoagulants increase this risk even more. Yet, validated bleeding risk models for prediction of bleeding risk in patients with cancer are lacking. The aim of this study is to predict bleeding risk in anticoagulated patients with cancer.Methods We performed a study using the routine healthcare database of the Julius General Practitioners’ Network. Five bleeding risk models were selected for external validation. Patients with a new cancer episode during anticoagulant treatment or those initiating anticoagulation during active cancer were included. The outcome was the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. Next, we internally validated an updated bleeding risk model accounting for the competing risk of death.Results The validation cohort consisted of 1304 patients with cancer, mean age 74.0±10.9 years, 52.2% males. In total 215 (16.5%) patients developed a first major or CRNM bleeding during a mean follow-up of 1.5 years (incidence rate; 11.0 per 100 person-years (95% CI 9.6 to 12.5)). The c-statistics of all selected bleeding risk models were low, around 0.56. Internal validation of an updated model accounting for death as competing risk showed a slightly improved c-statistic of 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.70). On updating, only age and a history of bleeding appeared to contribute to the prediction of bleeding risk.Conclusions Existing bleeding risk models cannot accurately differentiate bleeding risk between patients. Future studies may use our updated model as a starting point for further development of bleeding risk models in patients with cancer.https://openheart.bmj.com/content/10/1/e002273.full
spellingShingle FH Rutten
M van Smeden
EM Trinks-Roerdink
GJ Geersing
MEW Hemels
IC van Gelder
FA Klok
S van Doorn
External validation and updating of prediction models of bleeding risk in patients with cancer receiving anticoagulants
Open Heart
title External validation and updating of prediction models of bleeding risk in patients with cancer receiving anticoagulants
title_full External validation and updating of prediction models of bleeding risk in patients with cancer receiving anticoagulants
title_fullStr External validation and updating of prediction models of bleeding risk in patients with cancer receiving anticoagulants
title_full_unstemmed External validation and updating of prediction models of bleeding risk in patients with cancer receiving anticoagulants
title_short External validation and updating of prediction models of bleeding risk in patients with cancer receiving anticoagulants
title_sort external validation and updating of prediction models of bleeding risk in patients with cancer receiving anticoagulants
url https://openheart.bmj.com/content/10/1/e002273.full
work_keys_str_mv AT fhrutten externalvalidationandupdatingofpredictionmodelsofbleedingriskinpatientswithcancerreceivinganticoagulants
AT mvansmeden externalvalidationandupdatingofpredictionmodelsofbleedingriskinpatientswithcancerreceivinganticoagulants
AT emtrinksroerdink externalvalidationandupdatingofpredictionmodelsofbleedingriskinpatientswithcancerreceivinganticoagulants
AT gjgeersing externalvalidationandupdatingofpredictionmodelsofbleedingriskinpatientswithcancerreceivinganticoagulants
AT mewhemels externalvalidationandupdatingofpredictionmodelsofbleedingriskinpatientswithcancerreceivinganticoagulants
AT icvangelder externalvalidationandupdatingofpredictionmodelsofbleedingriskinpatientswithcancerreceivinganticoagulants
AT faklok externalvalidationandupdatingofpredictionmodelsofbleedingriskinpatientswithcancerreceivinganticoagulants
AT svandoorn externalvalidationandupdatingofpredictionmodelsofbleedingriskinpatientswithcancerreceivinganticoagulants