Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses
Abstract The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the Citrus leprosis viruses for the EU territory and identified five distinct viruses, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV‐C), Citrus leprosis virus C2 (CiLV‐C2), Hibiscus green spot virus 2 (HGSV‐2), the Citrus strain of Orchid fl...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | EFSA Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110 |
| _version_ | 1818430286343438336 |
|---|---|
| author | EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) Michael Jeger Claude Bragard David Caffier Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz Gianni Gilioli Jean‐Claude Gregoire Josep Anton Jaques Miret Alan MacLeod Maria Navajas Navarro Björn Niere Stephen Parnell Roel Potting Trond Rafoss Vittorio Rossi Gregor Urek Ariena Van Bruggen Wopke Van der Werf Jonathan West Elisavet Chatzivassiliou Stephan Winter Antonino Catara Núria Duran‐Vila Gabor Hollo Thierry Candresse |
| author_facet | EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) Michael Jeger Claude Bragard David Caffier Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz Gianni Gilioli Jean‐Claude Gregoire Josep Anton Jaques Miret Alan MacLeod Maria Navajas Navarro Björn Niere Stephen Parnell Roel Potting Trond Rafoss Vittorio Rossi Gregor Urek Ariena Van Bruggen Wopke Van der Werf Jonathan West Elisavet Chatzivassiliou Stephan Winter Antonino Catara Núria Duran‐Vila Gabor Hollo Thierry Candresse |
| author_sort | EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the Citrus leprosis viruses for the EU territory and identified five distinct viruses, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV‐C), Citrus leprosis virus C2 (CiLV‐C2), Hibiscus green spot virus 2 (HGSV‐2), the Citrus strain of Orchid fleck virus (OFV) and Citrus leprosis virus N sensu novo (CiLV‐N) as causing this severe disease, most significantly in sweet orange and mandarin. These viruses have in common that they do not cause systemic infections in their hosts and that they all are transmitted by Brevipalpus spp. mites (likely but not confirmed for HGSV‐2). Mites represent the most important means of virus spread, while plants for planting of Citrus are only considered of minor significance. These well characterised viruses occur in South and Central America. Leprosis is currently regulated in directive 2000/29 EC and, together with its associated viruses, has never been recorded in the EU. All five viruses have the potential to enter into, establish in and spread within the EU territory, with plants for planting of non‐regulated hosts, fruits of Citrus and hitch‐hiking of viruliferous mites identified as the most significant pathways. Given the severity of the leprosis disease, the introduction and spread of the various viruses would have negative consequences on the EU citrus industry, the magnitude of which is difficult to evaluate given the uncertainties affecting the Brevipalpus spp. vectors (identity, distribution, density, transmission specificity and efficiency). Overall, leprosis and its five associated viruses meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as Union quarantine pests, but do not fulfil those of being present in the EU or of plants for planting being the main spread mechanism to qualify as Union regulated non‐quarantine pests. The main uncertainties affecting this categorisation concern the Brevipalpus spp. mite vectors. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T15:31:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9f697783944a4b0aa92ff1a76809a46e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1831-4732 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T15:31:00Z |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | EFSA Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-9f697783944a4b0aa92ff1a76809a46e2022-12-21T22:55:53ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322017-12-011512n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis virusesEFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)Michael JegerClaude BragardDavid CaffierKatharina Dehnen‐SchmutzGianni GilioliJean‐Claude GregoireJosep Anton Jaques MiretAlan MacLeodMaria Navajas NavarroBjörn NiereStephen ParnellRoel PottingTrond RafossVittorio RossiGregor UrekAriena Van BruggenWopke Van der WerfJonathan WestElisavet ChatzivassiliouStephan WinterAntonino CataraNúria Duran‐VilaGabor HolloThierry CandresseAbstract The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the Citrus leprosis viruses for the EU territory and identified five distinct viruses, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV‐C), Citrus leprosis virus C2 (CiLV‐C2), Hibiscus green spot virus 2 (HGSV‐2), the Citrus strain of Orchid fleck virus (OFV) and Citrus leprosis virus N sensu novo (CiLV‐N) as causing this severe disease, most significantly in sweet orange and mandarin. These viruses have in common that they do not cause systemic infections in their hosts and that they all are transmitted by Brevipalpus spp. mites (likely but not confirmed for HGSV‐2). Mites represent the most important means of virus spread, while plants for planting of Citrus are only considered of minor significance. These well characterised viruses occur in South and Central America. Leprosis is currently regulated in directive 2000/29 EC and, together with its associated viruses, has never been recorded in the EU. All five viruses have the potential to enter into, establish in and spread within the EU territory, with plants for planting of non‐regulated hosts, fruits of Citrus and hitch‐hiking of viruliferous mites identified as the most significant pathways. Given the severity of the leprosis disease, the introduction and spread of the various viruses would have negative consequences on the EU citrus industry, the magnitude of which is difficult to evaluate given the uncertainties affecting the Brevipalpus spp. vectors (identity, distribution, density, transmission specificity and efficiency). Overall, leprosis and its five associated viruses meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as Union quarantine pests, but do not fulfil those of being present in the EU or of plants for planting being the main spread mechanism to qualify as Union regulated non‐quarantine pests. The main uncertainties affecting this categorisation concern the Brevipalpus spp. mite vectors.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110Citrus leprosis virusBrevipalpus spp.Citrus leprosis virus C.Citrus leprosis virus C2Hibiscus green spot virus 2Orchid fleck virus |
| spellingShingle | EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) Michael Jeger Claude Bragard David Caffier Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz Gianni Gilioli Jean‐Claude Gregoire Josep Anton Jaques Miret Alan MacLeod Maria Navajas Navarro Björn Niere Stephen Parnell Roel Potting Trond Rafoss Vittorio Rossi Gregor Urek Ariena Van Bruggen Wopke Van der Werf Jonathan West Elisavet Chatzivassiliou Stephan Winter Antonino Catara Núria Duran‐Vila Gabor Hollo Thierry Candresse Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses EFSA Journal Citrus leprosis virus Brevipalpus spp. Citrus leprosis virus C. Citrus leprosis virus C2 Hibiscus green spot virus 2 Orchid fleck virus |
| title | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
| title_full | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
| title_fullStr | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
| title_short | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
| title_sort | pest categorisation of citrus leprosis viruses |
| topic | Citrus leprosis virus Brevipalpus spp. Citrus leprosis virus C. Citrus leprosis virus C2 Hibiscus green spot virus 2 Orchid fleck virus |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT efsapanelonplanthealthplh pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT michaeljeger pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT claudebragard pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT davidcaffier pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT katharinadehnenschmutz pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT giannigilioli pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT jeanclaudegregoire pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT josepantonjaquesmiret pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT alanmacleod pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT marianavajasnavarro pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT bjornniere pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT stephenparnell pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT roelpotting pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT trondrafoss pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT vittoriorossi pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT gregorurek pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT arienavanbruggen pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT wopkevanderwerf pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT jonathanwest pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT elisavetchatzivassiliou pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT stephanwinter pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT antoninocatara pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT nuriaduranvila pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT gaborhollo pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT thierrycandresse pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses |