BMI-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds to Discriminate Elevated Cardiometabolic Risk in White and African American Adults

Objective: Waist circumference (WC) is a useful anthropometric tool to estimate cardiometabolic risk. However, BMI influences the relationship between WC and health. This study determined BMI-, sex- and race-specific WC thresholds. Methods: The study sample included 6,452 whites and African American...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda E. Staiano, Claude Bouchard, Peter T. Katzmarzyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2013-08-01
Series:Obesity Facts
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/354712
_version_ 1828887728244129792
author Amanda E. Staiano
Claude Bouchard
Peter T. Katzmarzyk
author_facet Amanda E. Staiano
Claude Bouchard
Peter T. Katzmarzyk
author_sort Amanda E. Staiano
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Waist circumference (WC) is a useful anthropometric tool to estimate cardiometabolic risk. However, BMI influences the relationship between WC and health. This study determined BMI-, sex- and race-specific WC thresholds. Methods: The study sample included 6,452 whites and African Americans (AA) aged 18-64 years. WC, BMI, and cardiovascular risk factors were assessed in the clinic. An elevated cardiometabolic risk was defined as the presence of ≥2 cardiometabolic risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine BMI-, sex-, and race-specific WC thresholds. Results: Based on logistic regression, elevated WC within each BMI category was associated with higher cardiometabolic risk. The respective optimal BMI-specific WC thresholds for white women, AA women, white men, and AA men were as follows: 72, 76, 82, and 78 cm for normal-weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2); 87, 85, 95, and 92 cm for overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2); 97, 97, 107, and 104 cm for obese I (30-34.9 kg/m2); and 111, 110, 120, and 119 cm for obese II+ (≥35 kg/m2) participants. Sensitivities ranged from 52.7 to 73.3%, and specificities ranged from 57.1 to 73.5%. Conclusion: The proposed optimal BMI-, sex-, and race-specific WC thresholds are warranted for use in the clinical setting until representative standards become available based on results from longitudinal studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T12:09:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f7481e5f6dd4f7390c38733acaef0ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-4025
1662-4033
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T12:09:49Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher Karger Publishers
record_format Article
series Obesity Facts
spelling doaj.art-9f7481e5f6dd4f7390c38733acaef0ed2022-12-21T23:46:53ZengKarger PublishersObesity Facts1662-40251662-40332013-08-016431732410.1159/000354712354712BMI-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds to Discriminate Elevated Cardiometabolic Risk in White and African American AdultsAmanda E. StaianoClaude BouchardPeter T. KatzmarzykObjective: Waist circumference (WC) is a useful anthropometric tool to estimate cardiometabolic risk. However, BMI influences the relationship between WC and health. This study determined BMI-, sex- and race-specific WC thresholds. Methods: The study sample included 6,452 whites and African Americans (AA) aged 18-64 years. WC, BMI, and cardiovascular risk factors were assessed in the clinic. An elevated cardiometabolic risk was defined as the presence of ≥2 cardiometabolic risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine BMI-, sex-, and race-specific WC thresholds. Results: Based on logistic regression, elevated WC within each BMI category was associated with higher cardiometabolic risk. The respective optimal BMI-specific WC thresholds for white women, AA women, white men, and AA men were as follows: 72, 76, 82, and 78 cm for normal-weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2); 87, 85, 95, and 92 cm for overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2); 97, 97, 107, and 104 cm for obese I (30-34.9 kg/m2); and 111, 110, 120, and 119 cm for obese II+ (≥35 kg/m2) participants. Sensitivities ranged from 52.7 to 73.3%, and specificities ranged from 57.1 to 73.5%. Conclusion: The proposed optimal BMI-, sex-, and race-specific WC thresholds are warranted for use in the clinical setting until representative standards become available based on results from longitudinal studies.http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/354712Waist circumferenceObesityRisk factorsEpidemiology
spellingShingle Amanda E. Staiano
Claude Bouchard
Peter T. Katzmarzyk
BMI-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds to Discriminate Elevated Cardiometabolic Risk in White and African American Adults
Obesity Facts
Waist circumference
Obesity
Risk factors
Epidemiology
title BMI-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds to Discriminate Elevated Cardiometabolic Risk in White and African American Adults
title_full BMI-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds to Discriminate Elevated Cardiometabolic Risk in White and African American Adults
title_fullStr BMI-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds to Discriminate Elevated Cardiometabolic Risk in White and African American Adults
title_full_unstemmed BMI-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds to Discriminate Elevated Cardiometabolic Risk in White and African American Adults
title_short BMI-Specific Waist Circumference Thresholds to Discriminate Elevated Cardiometabolic Risk in White and African American Adults
title_sort bmi specific waist circumference thresholds to discriminate elevated cardiometabolic risk in white and african american adults
topic Waist circumference
Obesity
Risk factors
Epidemiology
url http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/354712
work_keys_str_mv AT amandaestaiano bmispecificwaistcircumferencethresholdstodiscriminateelevatedcardiometabolicriskinwhiteandafricanamericanadults
AT claudebouchard bmispecificwaistcircumferencethresholdstodiscriminateelevatedcardiometabolicriskinwhiteandafricanamericanadults
AT petertkatzmarzyk bmispecificwaistcircumferencethresholdstodiscriminateelevatedcardiometabolicriskinwhiteandafricanamericanadults