The Role of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes

Aims: Between 11 to 14% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) at diagnosis, related to a worse prognosis with a 5-year survival rate between 30 to 40%. The best treatment choice for this group of patients is still a challenge. The opti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisa Meldolesi, Giuditta Chiloiro, Roberta Giannini, Roberta Menghi, Roberto Persiani, Barbara Corvari, Claudio Coco, Stefania Manfrida, Carlo Ratto, Viola De Luca, Luigi Sofo, Sara Reina, Antonio Crucitti, Valeria Masiello, Nicola Dinapoli, Vincenzo Valentini, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/7/1643
_version_ 1797440213590474752
author Elisa Meldolesi
Giuditta Chiloiro
Roberta Giannini
Roberta Menghi
Roberto Persiani
Barbara Corvari
Claudio Coco
Stefania Manfrida
Carlo Ratto
Viola De Luca
Luigi Sofo
Sara Reina
Antonio Crucitti
Valeria Masiello
Nicola Dinapoli
Vincenzo Valentini
Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
author_facet Elisa Meldolesi
Giuditta Chiloiro
Roberta Giannini
Roberta Menghi
Roberto Persiani
Barbara Corvari
Claudio Coco
Stefania Manfrida
Carlo Ratto
Viola De Luca
Luigi Sofo
Sara Reina
Antonio Crucitti
Valeria Masiello
Nicola Dinapoli
Vincenzo Valentini
Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
author_sort Elisa Meldolesi
collection DOAJ
description Aims: Between 11 to 14% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) at diagnosis, related to a worse prognosis with a 5-year survival rate between 30 to 40%. The best treatment choice for this group of patients is still a challenge. The optimal radiotherapy (RT) dose for LPLN patients has been investigated. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from LARC patients with LPLN at the primary staging MRI, treated in our center from March 2003 to December 2020. Patients underwent a neoadjuvant concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) treatment on the primary tumor (T), mesorectum, and pelvic nodes, associated with a fluoride-based chemotherapy. The total reached dose was 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fr on the elective sites and 55 Gy at 2.2 Gy/fr on the disease and mesorectum. Patients were divided in two groups based on whether they received a simultaneous integrated RT boost on the LPLN or not. Overall Survival (OS), Disease Free Survival (DFS), Metastasis Free Survival (MFS), and Local Control (LC) were evaluated in the whole group and then compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 176 patients were evaluated: 82 were included in the RT boost group and 94 in the non-RT boost group. The median follow-up period was 57.8 months. All the clinical endpoint (OS, DFS, MFS, LC), resulted were affected by the simultaneous integrated boost on LPLN with a survival rate of 84.7%, 79.5%, 84.1%, and 92%, respectively, in the entire population. From the comparison of the two groups, there was a statistical significance towards the RT boost group with a <i>p</i> < 0.006, 0.030, 0.042, 0.026, respectively. Conclusions: Concomitant radiotherapy boost on positive LPLN has shown to be beneficial on the survival outcomes (OS, DFS, MFR, and LC) in patients with LARC and LPLN. This analysis demonstrates that a higher dose of radiotherapy on positive pelvic lymph nodes led not only to a higher local control but also to a better survival rate. These results, if validated by future prospective studies, can bring a valid alternative to the surgery dissection without the important side effects and permanent disabilities observed during the years.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:04:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f772cf0a3a541bf8242e53eaaa1f55d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:04:56Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-9f772cf0a3a541bf8242e53eaaa1f55d2023-11-30T22:59:59ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942022-03-01147164310.3390/cancers14071643The Role of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph NodesElisa Meldolesi0Giuditta Chiloiro1Roberta Giannini2Roberta Menghi3Roberto Persiani4Barbara Corvari5Claudio Coco6Stefania Manfrida7Carlo Ratto8Viola De Luca9Luigi Sofo10Sara Reina11Antonio Crucitti12Valeria Masiello13Nicola Dinapoli14Vincenzo Valentini15Maria Antonietta Gambacorta16Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDigestive Surgery Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Rome, ItalyDigestive Surgery Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDigestive Surgery Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDigestive Surgery Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDigestive Surgery Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDigestive Surgery Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, 00168 Roma, ItalyAims: Between 11 to 14% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) at diagnosis, related to a worse prognosis with a 5-year survival rate between 30 to 40%. The best treatment choice for this group of patients is still a challenge. The optimal radiotherapy (RT) dose for LPLN patients has been investigated. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from LARC patients with LPLN at the primary staging MRI, treated in our center from March 2003 to December 2020. Patients underwent a neoadjuvant concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) treatment on the primary tumor (T), mesorectum, and pelvic nodes, associated with a fluoride-based chemotherapy. The total reached dose was 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fr on the elective sites and 55 Gy at 2.2 Gy/fr on the disease and mesorectum. Patients were divided in two groups based on whether they received a simultaneous integrated RT boost on the LPLN or not. Overall Survival (OS), Disease Free Survival (DFS), Metastasis Free Survival (MFS), and Local Control (LC) were evaluated in the whole group and then compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 176 patients were evaluated: 82 were included in the RT boost group and 94 in the non-RT boost group. The median follow-up period was 57.8 months. All the clinical endpoint (OS, DFS, MFS, LC), resulted were affected by the simultaneous integrated boost on LPLN with a survival rate of 84.7%, 79.5%, 84.1%, and 92%, respectively, in the entire population. From the comparison of the two groups, there was a statistical significance towards the RT boost group with a <i>p</i> < 0.006, 0.030, 0.042, 0.026, respectively. Conclusions: Concomitant radiotherapy boost on positive LPLN has shown to be beneficial on the survival outcomes (OS, DFS, MFR, and LC) in patients with LARC and LPLN. This analysis demonstrates that a higher dose of radiotherapy on positive pelvic lymph nodes led not only to a higher local control but also to a better survival rate. These results, if validated by future prospective studies, can bring a valid alternative to the surgery dissection without the important side effects and permanent disabilities observed during the years.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/7/1643locally advanced rectal cancerlateral pelvic positive nodesradiotherapysimultaneous integrated boostchemoradiotherapy
spellingShingle Elisa Meldolesi
Giuditta Chiloiro
Roberta Giannini
Roberta Menghi
Roberto Persiani
Barbara Corvari
Claudio Coco
Stefania Manfrida
Carlo Ratto
Viola De Luca
Luigi Sofo
Sara Reina
Antonio Crucitti
Valeria Masiello
Nicola Dinapoli
Vincenzo Valentini
Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
The Role of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes
Cancers
locally advanced rectal cancer
lateral pelvic positive nodes
radiotherapy
simultaneous integrated boost
chemoradiotherapy
title The Role of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes
title_full The Role of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes
title_fullStr The Role of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes
title_short The Role of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes
title_sort role of simultaneous integrated boost in locally advanced rectal cancer patients with positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes
topic locally advanced rectal cancer
lateral pelvic positive nodes
radiotherapy
simultaneous integrated boost
chemoradiotherapy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/7/1643
work_keys_str_mv AT elisameldolesi theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT giudittachiloiro theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT robertagiannini theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT robertamenghi theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT robertopersiani theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT barbaracorvari theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT claudiococo theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT stefaniamanfrida theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT carloratto theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT violadeluca theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT luigisofo theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT sarareina theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT antoniocrucitti theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT valeriamasiello theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT nicoladinapoli theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT vincenzovalentini theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT mariaantoniettagambacorta theroleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT elisameldolesi roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT giudittachiloiro roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT robertagiannini roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT robertamenghi roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT robertopersiani roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT barbaracorvari roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT claudiococo roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT stefaniamanfrida roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT carloratto roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT violadeluca roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT luigisofo roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT sarareina roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT antoniocrucitti roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT valeriamasiello roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT nicoladinapoli roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT vincenzovalentini roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes
AT mariaantoniettagambacorta roleofsimultaneousintegratedboostinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithpositivelateralpelviclymphnodes